Ramius Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 we need the Homer Simpson drooling smilie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I don't think so. I saw full nudes of her, and they look pretty real to me. Of course, I am more than willing to continue my research on this subject. 447616[/snapback] Time for the real or fake test! http://www.sexinfo101.com/ga_rof.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I'll bet she could also be used as a flotation device... :drool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I don't think so. I saw full nudes of her, and they look pretty real to me. Of course, I am more than willing to continue my research on this subject. 447616[/snapback] Perhaps you could surreptitiously provide the location of those pics. I feel I am qualified to be your research assistant on this project. If any hands on experimentation or comparisons are required you are in too lofty a position for such work. I on the other hand am looking up to the gutter, so better me than thee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Perhaps you could surreptitiously provide the location of those pics. 447727[/snapback] Here you go... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Here you go... 447739[/snapback] You're out of luck Beerball, I just searched and didn't find any pictures of her with either a midget or a donkey... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Here you go... 447739[/snapback] Helps if you turn off "Safe Search"...or so I heard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Here you go... 447739[/snapback] "french chick with big breasts" didn't come up with her picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Helps if you turn off "Safe Search"...or so I heard... 447753[/snapback] I would give the direct link, but it is only for professional researchers (that, and a TOS violation). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 You're out of luck Beerball, I just searched and didn't find any pictures of her with either a midget or a donkey... 447751[/snapback] What about a midget donkey? Any of those? GG will have to wait until this evening for my $.02 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 "french chick with big breasts" didn't come up with her picture. 447759[/snapback] you need to add "and funny name" at the end. Either that or "and shaved armpits." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 "french chick with big breasts" didn't come up with her picture. 447759[/snapback] I don't think you can say 'breasts'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 you need to add "and funny name" at the end. Either that or "and shaved armpits." 447765[/snapback] "French chick with shaved armpits" yielded "no pages found". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I don't think you can say 'breasts'. 447767[/snapback] It's his board. He can say whatever he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Time for the real or fake test!http://www.sexinfo101.com/ga_rof.shtml 447719[/snapback] 90% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 What's the problem with breasts? And why search for a girl with big ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 What's the problem with breasts? And why search for a girl with big ones? 447782[/snapback] More then a handful is too much, of course I wouldn't complain either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 It's his board. He can say whatever he wants. 447770[/snapback] Not breasts though. Boobs, boobies, bazombas, breastesess, taataas, teats, hooters, breast, bosom, knockers, jugs, mammilla, mamilla, sweater puppies, and headlights are all OK, but definitely no breasts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Not breasts though. Boobs, boobies, bazombas, breastesess, taataas, teats, hooters, breast, bosom, knockers, jugs, mammilla, mamilla, sweater puppies, and headlights are all OK, but definitely no breasts. 447806[/snapback] How about using various fruits to describe breasts: cantelopes, watermelons, etc. Is that OK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 How about using various fruits to describe breasts: cantelopes, watermelons, etc. Is that OK? 447812[/snapback] Long as you don't say tit it would be OK. You could disguise the word though. Like you could call someone a dikc without having to worry about the poop filters. For tit you could type tit and that would be OK because I reversed the word and it isn't tit anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts