Lineup looking good(or bad) on paper means NOTHING

[LabattBlue]

Everybody thought Tampa's OL was supposed to be pitiful this year, yet Cadillac has gone 2 for 2 in terms of 100 yard games. On the other side of the coin, we have one of the top OL coaches in the NFL and have what appears to be on paper an OL that should be successful in the run game. Here is Tampa's starting 5...

 

LT 69 Anthony Davis

LG 72 Dan Buenning

C 76 John Wade

RG 79 Sean Mahan

RT 67 Kenyatta Walker

[VABills]

On paper we are just as bad:

 

Gandy - 70

Anderson - 72

Teague - 72

Villarrial - 76

Williams - 72

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

Everybody thought Tampa's OL was supposed to be pitiful this year, yet Cadillac has gone 2 for 2 in terms of 100 yard games.  On the other side of the coin, we have one of the top  OL coaches in the NFL and have what appears to be on paper an OL that should be successful in the run game.  Here is Tampa's starting 5...

 

LT    69 Anthony Davis       

LG  72 Dan Buenning   

C  76 John Wade   

RG  79 Sean Mahan   

RT  67 Kenyatta Walker

446183[/snapback]

 

Walker looked pretty good yesterday, huh?

 

I always chuckle when people call him a bust.

[RuntheDamnBall]

Hell, we thought we might be seeing Walker here in Buffalo, he was so "bad."

[LabattBlue]

On paper we are just as bad:

 

Gandy    - 70

Anderson  - 72

Teague    - 72

Villarrial  - 76

Williams  - 72

446206[/snapback]

 

Are those scouts inc. ratings? Just curious, because I've felt in the past that they are pretty insightful.

[VABills]

 

Are those scouts inc. ratings?  Just curious, because I've felt in the past that they are pretty insightful.

446309[/snapback]

Yes. Isn't that what your numbers were from?

 

I guess not:

 

LT 69 Anthony Davis - 64

LG 72 Dan Buenning - 30

C 76 John Wade - 66

RG 79 Sean Mahan - 72

RT 67 Kenyatta Walker - 68

Edited September 19, 2005 by VABills