seq004 Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 When he came in the second half of the Tampa game our running game really picked up. He's a guard so I guess he won't be able to cover Mike Williams spot next week but sure would like to see him again.
jester43 Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 i would say so, but since 90%of the team sucked ass today, i doubt it would have mattered.
Matt in KC Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 So, who do you think he'd be an upgrade over? He's definitely weaker than any of the starters IMO, but I'm impressed that he's not a glaring weakness when he comes in. This kid may well have a bright future, and I am glad to see him getting time in the line up for his development, though this does mean others (CV, MW) have been hurt.
jester43 Posted September 18, 2005 Posted September 18, 2005 maybe 58 isn't healthy yet? the only rushing attack we've had in 2 games was preston's half at RG vs. the texans.
seq004 Posted September 18, 2005 Author Posted September 18, 2005 maybe 58 isn't healthy yet? the only rushing attack we've had in 2 games was preston's half at RG vs. the texans. 445543[/snapback] That's what I'm saying. Go back and look at the tape of the Houston game. We had no running attack at all till the second half when CV left in pain and the "Duke" came in. I think maybe Chris isn't 100% yet.
Recommended Posts