richNjoisy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/injuries I would have expected OUT or DOUBTFUL The last I read, he still had a cast on.
ajzepp Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 I think he was listed as Questionable for the last game, too, actually. Someone posted about it before the decapitation of Houston.
BRH Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 One nice thing is that three of TB's O-linemen are listed as questionable. Well, we always knew they were questionable, but on top of that, they're hurt, too.
NJ_BillsFan Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Deion Branch was questionable for 12 weeks last year.
richNjoisy Posted September 14, 2005 Author Posted September 14, 2005 I think he was listed as Questionable for the last game, too, actually. Someone posted about it before the decapitation of Houston. 440520[/snapback] not so interesting then more like, annoying
ajzepp Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 not so interesting then more like, annoying 440536[/snapback] Nah, we kicked asss last week man....not much is annoying this week....good job!
richNjoisy Posted September 14, 2005 Author Posted September 14, 2005 Nah, we kicked asss last week man....not much is annoying this week....good job! 440541[/snapback] On the other hand, at bb.com, here is last week's injury report. http://www.buffalobills.com/team/injury.jsp Parrish is listed as OUT Could be that either ESPN page is not accurate OR that the report that Parrish was listed as questionable last week was inaccurate OR that the bb.com page was updated and change after the questionable report was first issued Anyway, I will watch the bb.com page for an update. -RnJ
scribo Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 not so interesting then more like, annoying 440536[/snapback] I wouldn't say it is annoying to me -- maybe to Gruden and company. It may be a move to make the Bucs at least think about "what if Parrish plays." It seems like a good move to me. Also, I can confirm that ESPN had him listed as questionable last week, too.
ajzepp Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 On the other hand, at bb.com, here is last week's injury report. http://www.buffalobills.com/team/injury.jsp Parrish is listed as OUT Could be that either ESPN page is not accurate OR that the report that Parrish was listed as questionable last week was inaccurate OR that the bb.com page was updated and change after the questionable report was first issued Anyway, I will watch the bb.com page for an update. -RnJ 440544[/snapback] Well there ya go, then....looks like I'm the annoying one instead lol
ajzepp Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Or maybe it was THIS guy who is the annoying one.....hmmmmm http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...sh+questionable
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Parrish was listed as "OUT" last week. If he IS "QUESTIONABLE" this week, that's great news! It means he's definitely back for game 3. And as for still wearing a cast, he'll probably wear a cast for a good while after he returns, like Milloy did last year.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 BTW, Euhus is listed as "QUESTIONABLE" as well, which would be great news as well if true. Also interesting to note is that Everett is "OUT INDEFINITELY" and Chris Villarrial plays for the Ravens now.
eball Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 I think he was listed as Questionable for the last game, too, actually. Someone posted about it before the decapitation of Houston. 440520[/snapback] not correct. he was OUT on last week's official NFL injury report. questionable means 50-50 chance. oh boy oh boy oh boy.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 On second though, after perusing the injury lists, these guys are clueless! Under Panthers they have Kris Jenkins as "OUT FOR SEASON" AND "QUESTIONABLE."
eball Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 fyi, the ESPN "injuries" page in their NFL section is not the official NFL injury report. i've found many inconsistencies over the years.
stuckincincy Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Consider the possibility of individuals within non-official organizations diddling with a betting line. Lots of bucsk are spent by NFL bettors and the fantasy crowd. Fiddling with reports and spreading rumors is a bookie's job- i.e. "rumors say that that horse appeared a bit hobbled in practice". Old stuff.
Taro T Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 Parrish was listed as "OUT" last week. If he IS "QUESTIONABLE" this week, that's great news! It means he's definitely back for game 3. And as for still wearing a cast, he'll probably wear a cast for a good while after he returns, like Milloy did last year. 440557[/snapback] How often do wide receivers play with casts on their wrists? Wouldn't that cut down on his ability to catch the football? I do expect to see Parrish back by week 4 or 5, but would be surprised to see him wearing a cast. I also do not expect to see him return kicks until about November when the Bills braintrust is confident that the wrist is fully healed. Dave.
ajzepp Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 How often do wide receivers play with casts on their wrists? Wouldn't that cut down on his ability to catch the football? 440592[/snapback] Relative to Josh Reed, you mean?
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 I think putting Parrish as questionable is a nice cloak and dagger move by the coach. Why let the opposition game plan for him. Just pop the surprise on them come game time.
seq004 Posted September 14, 2005 Posted September 14, 2005 not correct. he was OUT on last week's official NFL injury report. questionable means 50-50 chance. oh boy oh boy oh boy. 440567[/snapback] I think JP will really need him to open up the offense. We need more speed and Josh still aint cutting it.
Recommended Posts