AKC Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 You never saw James play did you? 441460[/snapback] In my eyes the best player ever to wear our uniform. He changed the whole game of pass coverage forever and the CB position evolved as a result of the types of athletes picked to play there because of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 In my eyes the best player ever to wear our uniform. He changed the whole game of pass coverage forever and the CB position evolved as a result of the types of athletes picked to play there because of him. 441469[/snapback] James never had the "INT" stats, but I believe he went 3 straight years without a TD being thrown against him. In addition, like Winfield he could flat out tackle. But he was LB or something in college and had to switch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Thanks for bringing in those stats that really show London's superiority- Takeo started right out of the chute and actually played in the tackle-friendly environment at ILB in a 3-4 scheme, a benfit London has never had. London also played almost nothing but ST in his first season and was situational in his second, not starting in either season as far as I remember. This menas for all intents and purposes it has taken Takeo two NFL seasons more to accrue a number of tackles similar to London. And the sack stat may be even more revealing- most experts would give the WLB spot a far, far greater opportunity for building up fat sack stats than coming from the middle. 441455[/snapback] ok. i guess this means that harry carson was a better linebacker than LT. he had more tackles, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeseburger_in_paradise Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 In my eyes the best player ever to wear our uniform. He changed the whole game of pass coverage forever and the CB position evolved as a result of the types of athletes picked to play there because of him. 441469[/snapback] Career ended early because of injury as I remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dean Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 I just want to say: THIS is what the Wall is about, IMO (except, of course, for the great OT threads). Both sides are making compelling arguments and there is, for the most part, respect for the others' opinions. When Kelly the Dog, formerly Dick Smub, AKC and other respected TSW members are chiming in...well...all I can say is BEAUTIFUL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Campy Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 If we're talking an All-Bills team, how can someone not mention George Saimes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Career ended early because of injury as I remember. 441493[/snapback] Yeah he blew a knee out. They couldn't rebuild them like they do today. I believe it was preseason non-the-less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 If we're talking an All-Bills team, how can someone not mention George Saimes? 441497[/snapback] Because they are too young. If it didn't happen in the last 10 years, they aren't the best ever. Don't you know how the hot pockets work. It about the here and now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Honestly, the way some of you are comparing Flectch and Spikes is interesting but simply does not jive. You can't statistically compare a WLB to a MLB in a 4-3. There is just no measure that would do it justice. All we are left with is personal preference or (like I tried to do) a comparison based on speculation if their roles were switched. There is a lot of good analysis here anyhow and it's a good sign that 2 of our linebackers are this good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LewPort71 Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Mike Stratton.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKC Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 ok. i guess this means that harry carson was a better linebacker than LT. he had more tackles, right? 441491[/snapback] I'll hear your argument- you're saying you believe Carson was better than LT. You might start by sharing those stats and observations that support your contention just as those of us who believe the quality levels between London and Takeo are greatly exaggerated have done in this string. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 I'll hear your argument- you're saying you believe Carson was better than LT. You might start by sharing those stats and observations that support your contention just as those of us who believe the quality levels between London and Takeo are greatly exaggerated have done in this string. 441546[/snapback] taylor's career best was 133 tackles. in 13 seasons, carson led the team in tackles 5 times. I can't find stats for him, but i've heard enough times about how many tackles he piled up in his career to be able to say that he was a tackling machine and made more tackles than taylor. carson had 20 tackles and 5 assists in 1982 game against green bay, for what it's worth. that being said, and despite your snappy comment about me saying carson was better than LT, anyone who knows anything about football can tell you that LT was far more dominating than carson (an excellent player in his own right). LT changed the game and the LB position specifically, and for 10 years was the most feared defensive player in the game. he was one of the greatest ever at being able to get to the qb while also being able to drop back in coverage. as for how this relates to spikes v. fletcher, well, spikes is far better in coverage (notice how the bills short passing defense improved dramatically between 02 and 03), is a far more disruptive player behind the LOS, and creates more turnovers. guys who effectively cover receivers in space don't get a lot of tackles, because the qb ain't throwing the ball that way. you can spin it any way you want, but just because fletcher -- a good but hardly great player, in my opinion -- gets a lot of tackles, it doesn't mean he can take things away from an opponent's offensive game plan. spikes does this. fletcher had a lot of tackles in 02, but looked lost in coverage and was literally eaten alive by your bete noire, tom brady, on two occasions that year. and it's not like the bills were taking anything away from anybody's game plan that year -- teams pretty much feasted on the bills d. on opening day the following year, the bills killed the pats, due in no small part to the awesome play of spikes, who made 3 or 4 plays behind the LOS and intercepted a pass. one game, to be sure, but pretty indicative. one final comment: most people here seem to believe that donohoe, whatever his faults, can accurately place value on a player. look how much he paid spikes v. fletcher. spikes got a signing bonus more than twice the value of fletcher's. and look who has made the pro bowl. it's not as if spikes was a higher profile player either -- fletcher played in 2 super bowls while spikes toiled with the bengals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BackInDaDay Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 No love for John Skorpan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1959BillsFan Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 This team has been gifted with way above average LBs throughout the years. Did you know Paul McGuire was actually listed as a LB, not a Punter??? There was Mike Stratton, Stew Barber, Harry Jacobs in the AFL days; John Skorpan (but the D at the time was real do-do);Jim Haslett and Shane Nelson (Bermuda Triangle fame); my Mom loved Eugene Marve and Lucius Sanford; Daryl Talley was heart and sole during ther SB run; Shane Conlan was prttty darned good; Bryce Paup and Chris Speilman were Pro-Bowlers, Free Agents, but pro-bowlers. Marty Shotenheimer couldn't make it in Buffalo because of all the LBs we had. OK, maybe he wasn't the greatest LB either. My point: this club has had a history of pretty darn good LBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mphs mike Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 I hope someone else added Mike Stratton to this debate before I did. He was top notch for an unbelievable defense in a high scorring, gun slinging AFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mphs mike Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Tom Cousineau and Walt Patulski were the two best in my eyes. 440970[/snapback] Wasn't Patulski a defensive end or has my memory failed me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Honestly, the way some of you are comparing Flectch and Spikes is interesting but simply does not jive. You can't statistically compare a WLB to a MLB in a 4-3. There is just no measure that would do it justice. All we are left with is personal preference or (like I tried to do) a comparison based on speculation if their roles were switched. There is a lot of good analysis here anyhow and it's a good sign that 2 of our linebackers are this good. 441535[/snapback] The scary good thing here is that though some valued TSW posters rag on Posey as not being a good player, in know as I have looked at the Bills zone blitz and tried to understand what they are doing I have really grown to repsect his talent and play a lot. Bertainly Spikes and Fletcher are better players, but there is a good argument that the key to our run blitz working as well as it does is actually seen in some very good play by Posey. Its unfortunate that this play is actually not easily seen in stats as his role is not generally one of producing a lot of sacks the way he was employed last year nor even one of a lot of big open field hits that get a player noticed. As best as I can tell though Posey has show great advanatages over his back-up Stamer in that the far more veteran Posey makes good reads as to whether players are lined up and the down and distance have led to a play call of a run or pass. He uses these reads and the play calls of Fletcher to back-up the DL at the POA on run plays or fall back into a zone or pick up a potential receiver in man-to-man correctly on most plays. No one is perfect and neither is Posey, but one of the reasons the Bills proved to be statistically successful last year was some good consistent play by Posey at the other OLB slot. I think the Bills really do have the best LB corps in the NFL and te even better news is that both Crowell and Haggen have been productive ST players and Stamer has been both a good back-up and also a productive ST player. It is incredibly entertaining to watch our D perform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 No love for John Skorpan? 441659[/snapback] I loved Villiapiano. Surely not in the class of TKO and Fletcher by the time he got here, but man he and Dobler and Simpson brought a winning attitude to a Bills team that desperately needed it. Funny story from the Bills website. The Bills acquired several other veterans that season: defensive back Bill Simpson, receiver Ron Jessie, fullback Roosevelt Leaks and an offensive guard who had been referred to as the dirtiest player in the league and would become Villapiano’s running mate, Conrad Dobler. "The last time I saw Conrad, he was with New Orleans," said Villapiano. "I had hurt my rib the week before playing against the Chiefs. I don’t know how he found out about it, but on the very first play of the game, he comes out and just throws a punch right into my rib, exactly where it was killing me. I knew he was a disgusting, dirty, rotten ballplayer, but right then, I found out for sure. Later in the game when they did a toss to Chuck Muncie, Conrad just kind of did a half-hearted pull and I came up from the side of him and I knew he had a bad neck, so I gave him a nice, big, fat elbow right under his facemask which really snaps your neck back. He had to leave the game which was wonderful. So then he came back in later and he looks up at me and he goes, ‘We’re even.’ That was like the first thing we ever said to each other. He and I had one big battle down there in New Orleans and then the next year we were teammates. We really got a kick out of that. I really liked the fact that Conrad was on the team because I knew he’d been in the playoffs before. He was a championship player and that’s what you need it you’re going to win. Guys that have been there." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdelma Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 The biscuit. He had everything going including that chick in the hotel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1959BillsFan Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Plenz, Excellent quote. I remember the days when those two were here. Young, real young o-line. Chuck Knox wanted leadership, so he brings in Dobler. Villiapiano too, he wanted dependable leadership there too. Neither was here very long, but damn, I loved when they were playing. Went to the playoffs twice in a row when they were here. The next two years 2-14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts