Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

it looked as if he hit the pylon before stepping out of bounds.

 

but why didnt the 2nd defender come up and try and tackle him. he saw him, but did nothing. he had to know fletcher would not tackle him in time.

Posted
he touched the pylon.  I replayed it over and over...oh well, not that it really matters now...Go Bills!!!

437385[/snapback]

 

I saw it. We maybe could have challenged, but we had no timeouts left so we couldn't. And the game had more than two minutes left in the first half, so the officials upstairs couldn't either.

Posted
it looked as if he hit the pylon before stepping out of bounds.

 

but why didnt the 2nd defender come up and try and tackle him. he saw him, but did nothing. he had to know fletcher would not tackle him in time.

437387[/snapback]

 

He was staying with the receiver. If he stepped up, Carr would have had an easy touchdown toss.

Posted

I thought he stepped out before the score.... Just glad it didn't cost us. It would have been nice to get the shut out though...

Posted
it looked as if he hit the pylon before stepping out of bounds.

 

but why didnt the 2nd defender come up and try and tackle him. he saw him, but did nothing. he had to know fletcher would not tackle him in time.

437387[/snapback]

 

 

discipline

Posted
He was staying with the receiver.  If he stepped up, Carr would have had an easy touchdown toss.

437393[/snapback]

 

Yep...

I don't think he stepped out, but it was close; and it was annoying how Brent Jones completely ignored the possibility while focusing on the ball hitting the pylon. Yeah Brent, I think even Phil Luckett can see that he hit the pylon. Shut up.

Posted

One replay angle made it look like he was out, but to me - the clearer shot showed the ball hitting the pylon just before his right foot touched. Almost like a play at first base, that quick, but it was a TD.

Posted

saw it, and i thought he may have stepped out, but...

 

1. We didnt have a timeout to challenge with

2. I dont think there was enough evidence to overturn the original call

Posted

I saw a replay of the TD on the highlight - looked to me like a TD. The D did well to cover it all up - and there's not much to say about it. Carr did a good job...

 

I'm not worried about giving up 7 in that sort of game.

Posted
He was staying with the receiver.  If he stepped up, Carr would have had an easy touchdown toss.

437393[/snapback]

fletcher was beat. it ended up being close, but carr was gunna get the TD rushing. yes he had disipline, but if he can see the qb will get a TD, shouldnt he come up and force carr to throw it? alot can happen on a pass.

Posted

As was already stated, the Bills didn't have any timeouts left, so MM couldn't challege. I think that it would have been overturned had it been reviewed.

 

All that said, it seemed like the team burned through those timeouts. This is a very good example of why it is important to only use TOs when 100 percent needed.

Posted

the same play happened later in the game (except it was at a different spot on the field). Carr needed a couple for a first down and Fletch chased him while Posey (covering Davis) came off of Davis just in time to stop the first down. Should Posey have done that on the TD play? Things happen way to fast to make the same play everytime, but maybe he knew he blew it on the TD and made sure he didn't blow it again.

×
×
  • Create New...