freak Posted September 14, 2004 Share Posted September 14, 2004 Same as last year. You can just look at the personell that we have on the field and call the plays from the stands. I mean when we run we always have a fullback or a second tight end in the game. Then if that doesn't work we bring in 3-4 WR to try and convert a 3rd down over 5 yards. It seems as if the Bills just call plays and hope they work instead of stringing plays together. Why don't we pass at least %75 of the time in formations and with personell that we run with? It would make it a lot harder for the defense to gameplan. With this commitment to the run, where are the play action passes? For instance if we have success running on 1st or 2nd down everything is fine. But if a D stops our run on the first couple of downs when it is obvious we are going to run then we then try to spread them out on 3rd. We need an identity: either we are going to come out with 2 backs or 2 TE's and learn to pass with this running personell on the field or we should go to a singleback 3 WR formation and learn to run with this group and make it our base formation. The Bills aren't dominant enough against better teams to just come in and say we are going to run you in the ground or we are going to air it out so some and stop us. But we have the talent to do both very good so why have a gameplan that is so predictable...wait we don't have a gameplan...we haven't had one since the K-gun. All the Bills do is call plays and hope they work. We don't set teams up and try to confuse them or make them bite we just call plays! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts