buffalo mike Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Time running out- anything? Would hate to see him leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerjamhead Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Let him walk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB2004 Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Let him walk. 423238[/snapback] Not a chance. Playmakers come around once in a while. That's exactly what Nate is. He's a winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgun Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Not a chance. Playmakers come around once in a while. That's exactly what Nate is. He's a winner. 423247[/snapback] EXACTLY a PLAYMAKER!!!!! We havent had one in the secondary since the other "Nate" Odomes. We need to sign this one, because he will continue his proven abbilities and become even a better cover corner. Whether he does this in Buffalo or some other team will come down to how well McGee playes. If he has a very good year, mabey we can move Clements and replace him with Greer or King on the other side. Oh, froget that. We need to keep Nate!! He has such a sweet physical frame, he can do it all. {No red had, lol} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Time running out- anything?Would hate to see him leave. 423234[/snapback] Didn't you hear? He was on today's cut list! PSYCH! PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFairPlay001 Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 are you serious? Didn't you hear? He was on today's cut list!PSYCH! PTR 423265[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 are you serious? 423271[/snapback] See: PSYCH! PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFairPlay001 Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 ah im an idiot See: PSYCH! PTR 423281[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Nate has "franchise tag" written all over him....... And I would DEMAND 2 1st round picks...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerjamhead Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Nate has "franchise tag" written all over him....... And I would DEMAND 2 1st round picks...... 423283[/snapback] Who do you think would give up two 1sts for him? Serious question here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsGuyInMalta Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Who do you think would give up two 1sts for him? Serious question here. 423291[/snapback] Who would give up a first rounder for Peerless Price? I think you'd be surprised at the teams that would come running after Clements, so we might as well get something for him if we cant work out a long-term deal with him. We wont know until we try...and then if we cant work out either a long-term deal or if Clements doesnt sign his one year franchise offer...ship him and trade him like we did with Peerless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Who do you think would give up two 1sts for him? Serious question here. 423291[/snapback] The same teams who would also be willing to make Clements the highest paid CB in the NFL. That's who. The Redskins will probably be the highest bidders in the offseason unless TD can re-sign NC now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Nate has "franchise tag" written all over him....... And I would DEMAND 2 1st round picks...... 423283[/snapback] Bullseye! But I'm hoping against hope and TD's past that we keep Nate. The scary thing is tho, who do we have to replace him? Nobody. He and Winfield were something we hadn't had in such a long time. Well except for Thomas Smith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts