UHSLA Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 I think one thing that contributed to our lack of a running game tonight was Mularkey's failure to use two TE sets. And I'm sorry, putting Peters in there just isn't the same thing IMO. I know Euhus is hurt and all, but Neufeld is a capable back up who most certainly would have helped with his blocking skills. I just thought that was interesting.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 As the other thread suggested, it seems that the Bills were trying to everything in their power to look as inept as possible, in order to lull the Texans (and others) into a false sense of security. Yes I just typed that. Oh and before anyone else does it: DOOOMED!
/dev/null Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 i thought those went out of fashion under the Dan Henning reign of terror
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 Like it or not we are in a pinch at TE with two players out with injury and one Campbell still recovering from an injury that has held back better players longer than he took to come back and play. Hence Jason Peters has resumed TE play. Trafford and probably Neufeld would have been cut without these injuries and now borh may stay were we to stick with the Peters exclusively as a LT plan.
coltrane34 Posted August 27, 2005 Posted August 27, 2005 Like it or not no one gameplans based on the preseason, so get the notion that they were trying to fool the texans out of your heads. They played a tough defense and the Bills starters won the game, end of conversation.
Recommended Posts