Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 Hadn't heard anything about that play. Was it drawn up to be a backward pass, or was Moulds supposed to have two steps forward, thus if play doesn't work, it would just be an imcomplete? My guess is it was supposed to have been a forward pass, same play as they ran later in game??
Alaska Darin Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 Hadn't heard anything about that play. Was it drawn up to be a backward pass, or was Moulds supposed to have two steps forward, thus if play doesn't work, it would just be an imcomplete? My guess is it was supposed to have been a forward pass, same play as they ran later in game?? 29206[/snapback] Lee Evans missed his block. That's pretty much the whole thing in a nutshell.
theesir Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 What blows for Drew (statistically) is that play counts as a fumble against HIM!
clayboy54 Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 Don't you know that there's no such thing as a lateral in the NFL? It's called a "backward pass" and yes it was. hahahaha Maybe it was supposed to be a Moulds option pass??????
Alaska Darin Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 Don't you know that there's no such thing as a lateral in the NFL? It's called a "backward pass" and yes it was. hahahaha Maybe it was supposed to be a Moulds option pass?????? 29282[/snapback] I'd believe that if it were Shaw and not Moulds. I think they were just trying to get EM the ball in space. He showed yesterday that he was as good after the catch as ever.
Recommended Posts