MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Drew Bledsoe's numbers in the all-powerful Belichick/Patriots system: 18 games/starts 597 attempts 352 completions 59% completion rate 3,691 yards 6.2 YPA 19 TDs 15 INTs 77.1 QB Rating 5 wins 13 losses That's one heck of a system. True. The defense was AMAZING in 2000 (and the first game of 2001). Thank goodness for the Pats Brady's addition made the defense better.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Okay let's see. We have a better RB better receivers better safeties better LBers They have better Oline better Dline Push on the corners overall So overall, we are probably very comparable. I am one who thinks line play is very important, and therefore give them more weight then the other spots. 417925[/snapback] I'm talking about the Pats and Eagles. Taking the QBs out of it, the Pats have less talent than the Eagles.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 True. The defense was AMAZING in 2000 (and the first game of 2001). Thank goodness for the Pats Brady's addition made the defense better. Try comparing the two QB's offensive numbers, genius.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 T.O.? Ever heard of this guy? He's making headlines these days. True. That Branch is a scrub. SB MVP means nothing, right? Ah but wait, Brady makes Branch look good. Check out McNabb's numbers with a star-less WR corps (like Brady has). You're right. 4 straight trips to the NFCCG (remember that TO missed the playoffs this past year). He sucks!
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Try comparing the two QB's offensive numbers, genius. I'll accept your admission of defeat.
VABills Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 I'm talking about the Pats and Eagles. Taking the QBs out of it, the Pats have less talent than the Eagles. 417937[/snapback] Why do I give two ***** about the Patsies?
MDH Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Tom Brady 417723[/snapback] Yep, Brady would immediately make us one of the favorites in the AFC, if not the favorite.
EndZoneCrew Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Dwight Freeney....imagine him opposite of Schobel with this defense....plus...throw in the fact that he went to the CUSE!...NICE
Sound_n_Fury Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Peyton Manning....nuff said. 417688[/snapback] When Payton wins a big game by himself, I'll agree with you.
Realist Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 When Payton wins a big game by himself, I'll agree with you. 418131[/snapback] If Peyton was on this team, he wouldn't have to win the big game by himself.
Sound_n_Fury Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 If Peyton was on this team, he wouldn't have to win the big game by himself. 418145[/snapback] Maybe, maybe not. IMO, there's some intangible missing with the guy when it comes to competitiveness. He makes more dumb mistakes / comes up small under pressure than any marquee QB I've seen in the last decade. My pick's Jonathan Ogden, BTW.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 True. That Branch is a scrub. SB MVP means nothing, right? Ah but wait, Brady makes Branch look good. Are you actually comparing Deion Branch to Terrell Owens? Don't get me wrong, I love what Branch brings as a player and he's proven to be a great big game guy, but his talent level is not close to Owens'. The guy's 5'7", for crying out loud! You're right. 4 straight trips to the NFCCG (remember that TO missed the playoffs this past year). He sucks! Nice straw man there. So with comparable offensive talent and superior defense around him, McNabb has consistently led his team to be 1-2 games worse than Brady's? But if McNabb were on the Patriots, he'd have led them to 5 Super Bowl wins? Not sure I follow your logic.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Why do I give two ***** about the Patsies? I was responding to a post ABOUT THE PATS to someone who ISN'T YOU.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 I'll accept your admission of defeat. Instead of doing that, why don't you compare Bledsoe's offensive numbers in the all-powerful Belichick/Weis/Patriots system to Brady's?
Rico Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 Nothing against JP, but Tom Brady without a doubt..
Dante Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 LT from the Chargers. Trade Magehee for a decent left side O Lineman.
scribo Posted August 25, 2005 Author Posted August 25, 2005 LT from the Chargers. Trade Magehee for a decent left side O Lineman. 418244[/snapback] I am not sure that LT is better than Willis, and LT seems to have just as many durablity issues. But I really like your thinking in bringing in a top-tier player with the intent of trading the guy we have in that position -- turning this dream pick into two picks.
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 It's so hard to pick one player, but two immeditatly sprang to mind 1. Ed Reed- Safety imo is quickly becoming the most important position in the defensive secondary and the 2 teams with the best safety "tandems" were in the superbowl last year, however you can't go wrong with the best overall safety in the nfl. 2. Jake Delhomme- I love what this guy brings to the table, and hella underrated. Classic Game manager with the ability to put up #'s and win games for you.
Dante Posted August 25, 2005 Posted August 25, 2005 I am not sure that LT is better than Willis, and LT seems to have just as many durablity issues. But I really like your thinking in bringing in a top-tier player with the intent of trading the guy we have in that position -- turning this dream pick into two picks. 418443[/snapback] As much as I like Willis and his terrific potential I dont think he is anywhere near LT at this moment. IMHO Tomilinson is the running back in the NFL right now. Not saying Willis couldnt be there in the future but right now he isnt in LT's league.
Recommended Posts