Thailog80 Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Pats. Hey Romeo quit helping them out. You are in Cleveland now.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Well think about it for a minute. If Davis couldn't help the BROWNS, how much could he help the Pats? It's not like Crennel is a moron or anything.
stuckincincy Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Crennel hasn't coached much offense. 414333[/snapback] And the #3 overall pick has to be in the line-up.
Thailog80 Posted August 22, 2005 Author Posted August 22, 2005 And the #3 overall pick has to be in the line-up. 414339[/snapback] Oh yeah that's very true.
scribo Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Davis certainly has some wheels. Good thing he often has at least one flat.
Blue Chipper Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Well think about it for a minute. If Davis couldn't help the BROWNS, how much could he help the Pats? It's not like Crennel is a moron or anything. 414323[/snapback] Thats how thin or desperate the Pats are at wideout. They cut then resigned Troy Brown (34 years old), David Givins was their top wr last season and only had 56 catches and lastly the signed Tim Dwight as a free agent. Not a real scary wide reciver group if you ask me.
scribo Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Thats how thin or desperate the Pats are at wideout. They cut then resigned Troy Brown (34 years old), David Givins was their top wr last season and only had 56 catches and lastly the signed Tim Dwight as a free agent. Not a real scary wide reciver group if you ask me. 414347[/snapback] Tim Dwight had some shining moments in San Diego.
d_wag Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Thats how thin or desperate the Pats are at wideout. They cut then resigned Troy Brown (34 years old), David Givins was their top wr last season and only had 56 catches and lastly the signed Tim Dwight as a free agent. Not a real scary wide reciver group if you ask me. 414347[/snapback] which is likely why they made a big play for derrick mason....... their WR's don't look very intimidating (do they ever?) but they have some real difference makers at TE.......daniel graham has established himself and if ben watson can stay healthy this year he will make some noise.......
Blue Chipper Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I remember watching the draft last year when the Pats selected Watson and all I could picture was Brady dumping the ball to him for 7 or 8 yards when ever he wanted to. That scares me alot more than the receivers who line up wide.
IDBillzFan Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 For those who seemingly never undertstand the value of extra draft picks, please see Exhibit A. Options.
eball Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 pats also lost patten to the skins. they need WR help.
AKC Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 which is likely why they made a big play for derrick mason....... their WR's don't look very intimidating (do they ever?) but they have some real difference makers at TE.......daniel graham has established himself and if ben watson can stay healthy this year he will make some noise....... 414357[/snapback] Their philosophy has been obvious- draft players who catch the ball and stay away from anyone who has any rep for dropping balls regardless of their "talent" level. It's a great strategy in the small passing game they play that functions on reliability, and it's also been hugely important to the success of their QB who is hardly a model of accuracy among NFL starters. The difference has been that his WRs go out and make plays on almost any ball, feeding the realization of "team" perfectly.
Kevbeau Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I actually think the Pats are solid at WR. In no particular order: Branch Terrell Johnson Givens Davis Brown Dwight No superstars, but they're pretty solid up and down the list. I don't think they'll be keeping 7 wr's so expect someone to be cut...and I have a bad feeling that Terrell is going to turn his career around in New England.
BuffBills#1 Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I don't know why we didn't pick him up for a 5th. We don't know how long Parish is going to be out, and Moulds hurt his ribs on Saturday. He would've been a nice insurance basically.
ATBNG Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I actually think the Pats are solid at WR. In no particular order: Branch Terrell Johnson Givens Davis Brown Dwight No superstars, but they're pretty solid up and down the list. I don't think they'll be keeping 7 wr's so expect someone to be cut...and I have a bad feeling that Terrell is going to turn his career around in New England. 414440[/snapback] Terrell and Johnson have been injured the last couple weeks, as has PK Sam (who they drafted last year and spent the year hurt/injured). Seems like a 5th round pick for Davis is pretty reasonable, but it's a bit surprising considering the depth at the position mentioned above. I'm just guessing they don't think they can count on those injured guys to make the opener, and they are a matchup driven offense to take advantage of Brady's best strength - find the matchup, make the quick decision and accurate throw. Dwight plays really hard and had a great game the other night, but I've been thinking he was a longshot to make the team all along. He's not what they need in the passing game as long as Brown is healthy, and they have been acquiring a lot of potential kick and/or punt returners this offseason (Morton, Starks, draft pick Ellis Hobbs). I think they'll have five WR on Opening Day - Givens, Branch, Davis, Brown, and Terrell. Johnson will be around because he's still on the PUP list.
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 ...the small passing game they play... Haven't watched the Pats since '02, huh? ...their QB who is hardly a model of accuracy among NFL starters...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Their philosophy has been obvious- draft players who catch the ball and stay away from anyone who has any rep for dropping balls regardless of their "talent" level. It's a great strategy in the small passing game they play that functions on reliability, and it's also been hugely important to the success of their QB who is hardly a model of accuracy among NFL starters. The difference has been that his WRs go out and make plays on almost any ball, feeding the realization of "team" perfectly. 414384[/snapback] Ouch, I have to agree with Hollywood on this one. AKC your making us look bad. Tom Brady might be a raging homosexual but his is a great QB.
AKC Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 414753[/snapback] Yeah, it's a real Dan Pastorini Offense you're running up there. Hell, I can toss 15 yard balls on the numbers when there's no pressure. At the same time I've seen loafer-boy in the instances when the scheme broke down and he faced the same pressure others QBs play with all the time- and he's looked a lot more like Rick Mirer than a solid NFL starter. His WRs bail him out regularly and that's a huge plus for the Pats. BTW-We're all looking forward to seing him without Jabba Da Hut running the offense ;-)
Hollywood Donahoe Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Again, have fun living in the past. Brady's become one of the most accurate deep passers in the league over the past couple of years.
Recommended Posts