scribo Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I know, there is no context provided here, and it really doesn't mean much (if anything). But I found it interesting, so I thought some here might as well. Player Team G Att Att/G Cmp Pct Yds Yds/G Lng TDs Int Sck SckY Rate J.P. Losman BUF 2 33 16.5 18 54.5 147 73.5 18 1 0 2 11 76.2 Roethlisberger PIT 2 15 7.5 8 53.3 64 32.0 20 0 1 0 0 36.5 Aaron Rodgers GB 2 15 7.5 6 40.0 28 14.0 8 0 1 3 13 20.1 Tom Brady NE 1 11 11.0 6 54.5 105 105.0 45 0 1 0 0 49.4 Drew Brees SD 2 28 14.0 15 53.6 145 72.5 29 0 1 0 0 53.4 Kyle Boller BAL 2 24 12.0 15 62.5 145 72.5 30 1 3 3 20 53.6 Drew Bledsoe DAL 1 8 8.0 4 50.0 27 27.0 15 0 0 2 10 57.8 Patrick Ramsey WAS 2 30 15.0 17 56.7 267 133.5 46 1 3 2 15 57.9 Carson Palmer CIN 2 35 17.5 16 45.7 189 94.5 45 2 2 0 0 57.9 Drew Henson DAL 1 13 13.0 6 46.2 64 64.0 13 0 0 1 9 61.1 A.J. Feeley MIA 3 40 13.3 26 65.0 190 63.3 22 0 1 1 7 65.6 Aaron Brooks NO 2 32 16.0 19 59.4 172 86.0 34 1 1 1 14 71.4 Gus Frerotte MIA 3 49 16.3 24 49.0 281 93.7 44 1 0 4 33 73.6 Byron Leftwich JAC 2 28 14.0 17 60.7 157 78.5 21 0 0 4 24 76.0
2003Contenders Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Interesting... And that only takes into account his passing stats -- not what he's been able to do with his legs.
stuckincincy Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I know, there is no context provided here, and it really doesn't mean much (if anything). But I found it interesting, so I thought some here might as well. Player Team G Att Att/G Cmp Pct Yds Yds/G Lng TDs Int Sck SckY Rate J.P. Losman BUF 2 33 16.5 18 54.5 147 73.5 18 1 0 2 11 76.2 414257[/snapback] How about Holcomb?
mead107 Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 How about Holcomb? 414270[/snapback] what about holcomb ?
scribo Posted August 22, 2005 Author Posted August 22, 2005 Player Team G Att Att/G Cmp Pct Yds Yds/G Lng TDs Int Sck SckY Rate Kelly Holcomb BUF 2 14 7.0 10 71.4 94 47.0 23 0 0 3 19 89.6 Tory Woodbury BUF 2 1 0.5 1 100.0 4 2.0 4 0 0 1 4 83.3 Shane Matthews BUF 2 8 4.0 5 62.5 19 9.5 6 0 0 0 0 66.7
RI Bills Fan Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Player Team G Att Att/G Cmp Pct Yds Yds/G Lng TDs Int Sck SckY Rate Kelly Holcomb BUF 2 14 7.0 10 71.4 94 47.0 23 0 0 3 19 89.6 Tory Woodbury BUF 2 1 0.5 1 100.0 4 2.0 4 0 0 1 4 83.3 Shane Matthews BUF 2 8 4.0 5 62.5 19 9.5 6 0 0 0 0 66.7 414278[/snapback] Matthews is outta here.
stuckincincy Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Player Team G Att Att/G Cmp Pct Yds Yds/G Lng TDs Int Sck SckY Rate Kelly Holcomb BUF 2 14 7.0 10 71.4 94 47.0 23 0 0 3 19 89.6 Tory Woodbury BUF 2 1 0.5 1 100.0 4 2.0 4 0 0 1 4 83.3 Shane Matthews BUF 2 8 4.0 5 62.5 19 9.5 6 0 0 0 0 66.7 414278[/snapback] Thanks. I'm still surprised they were able to scoop up Holcomb. Someone here pointed out that Woodbury can't go to the PS because of his time in the league. I've much respect for Matthews, but I'd like to see Shane to Dallas trade for a whatever-rounder before the season starts!
scribo Posted August 22, 2005 Author Posted August 22, 2005 Thanks. I'm still surprised they were able to scoop up Holcomb. Someone here pointed out that Woodbury can't go to the PS because of his time in the league. I've much respect for Matthews, but I'd like to see Shane to Dallas trade for a whatever-rounder before the season starts! 414291[/snapback] I agree that I would rather have Woodbury on the roster than Matthews. But I think Matthews would retire before allowing himself to be traded. If I remember corectly, he wanted to retire after last season, but TD talked him in to staying. I think Matthews is more of a coach than a player this year. All that said, hire Matthews as one more coach and keep Woodbury as the #3 / STer.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 Interesting... And that only takes into account his passing stats -- not what he's been able to do with his legs. 414265[/snapback] I don't think they track stats for dancing...
stuckincincy Posted August 22, 2005 Posted August 22, 2005 I don't think they track stats for dancing... 414328[/snapback] No...dancing has historcally been the responsibility of the GM.
Recommended Posts