philburger1 Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 250 miles per gallon? They're doing it! http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/08/15/hybrid....s.ap/index.html
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 250 miles per gallon? They're doing it!http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/08/15/hybrid....s.ap/index.html 407889[/snapback] Problem: Those vehicles still require energy to come from somewhere. That somewhere is typically a caol-burning power-plant. Now if we had 100% nuclear electricity generation, that would be a different story.
philburger1 Posted August 15, 2005 Author Posted August 15, 2005 Problem: Those vehicles still require energy to come from somewhere. That somewhere is typically a caol-burning power-plant. Now if we had 100% nuclear electricity generation, that would be a different story. 407904[/snapback] Right, but it they would use a lot less resources than traditional car. Check out this site: http://www.setamericafree.org/ Run by former CIA hawks for Reagan. Something conservatives and liberals can agree on: telling OPEC it kiss our butt.
John Adams Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 Right, but it they would use a lot less resources than traditional car. Check out this site: http://www.setamericafree.org/ Run by former CIA hawks for Reagan. Something conservatives and liberals can agree on: telling OPEC it kiss our butt. 407935[/snapback] Tell OPEC to kiss your butt
Ghost of BiB Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 I thought this was all going to be solved by the whacko with the UFO technology?
UConn James Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 Tell OPEC to kiss your butt 407984[/snapback] And for afterwards.... That seat looks just wide enough to give one an atomic wedgie.
Recommended Posts