krazykat Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 Probably should have come to that conclusion while they had the chance to convict him. Total idiots. They should do time and see if they like getting molested. 407567[/snapback] Just like the judges that let multiple time offenders go or out on probation. You hope it never happens again, but that if it does it's to one of their own children or grandchildren instead of those that want to see those people locked up. MJ, OJ, etc. It pays to be a celeb. Do whatever you want, unless of course you get involved in questionable stock transactions. Then there's hell to pay.
eSJayDee Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 Huh! So it's OK for an innocent person to go to jail? Oops. Other way around. Like someone above said. Our justice system is predicated on innocent until proven guilty. Better to let a dozen guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man. I agree w/ this in concept.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 These are the words of a juror. She said she had "no choice to but to let him go" but that now "she feels guilty, and God has forgiven her for letting Michael go, and now she has to forgive herself". Her (Juror #5) and another male juror were just on the news (MSNBC) and stated that "Michael Jackson is a serial child molestor". Unreal. 407558[/snapback] MJ didn't get off because the jury was stocked with stupid people. He got off because the prosecution was stocked with stupid people. Consider this: they charged with child molestation a man who publically admitted he sleeps with underaged boys, and they still couldn't convince 12 people who believe he's a child molester that he's a child molester. Yes, Jackson got off when he shouldn't have (double entendre not intended), but put the blame where it belongs. The jury, amazingly, actually managed to do their jobs properly.
30dive Posted August 15, 2005 Posted August 15, 2005 I agree w/ this in concept. 407759[/snapback] Phewwwww!!!!
Recommended Posts