Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow! I miss those Spy articles, that use to be, I guess, a weekly feature.

 

Like seeing the Spy cartoon/graphic that I haven't seen in quite a long time :P

 

And why isn't the Spy series linked from the TBD home page? :blink:

Posted
That reads like a composite of every Pete Prisco article over the last two years.

 

"The Patriots are 34-4 over the last two years, but...but...but..."

 

It gets a little old, I guess.

398279[/snapback]

 

I think you've just managed to blow away the good will you garnered yesterday. :blink:

Posted
So watch it, bub... :blink:

Okay, I do have a serious question about the article. Who are the three defensive Pro Bowlers the Pats lost? I count one (Bruschi), and two if you want to count Law (even though he was out for most of the year).

Posted
Okay, I do have a serious question about the article.  Who are the three defensive Pro Bowlers the Pats lost?  I count one (Bruschi), and two if you want to count Law (even though he was out for most of the year).

398318[/snapback]

 

Beats me. I didn't read it and didn't make comment about it. :blink:

Posted
Beats me. I didn't read it and didn't make comment about it. :P

It was more of a general comment directed to anyone who can answer it.

 

I guess that's why I jumped on this "article." If you're going to bash a team, at least get your facts straight! :blink:

Posted
It was more of a general comment directed to anyone who can answer it.

 

I guess that's why I jumped on this "article."  If you're going to bash a team, at least get your facts straight! :blink:

398332[/snapback]

maybe he thought Ted Johnson was a Pro Bowler

Posted

Wow, I didn't realize we had a section for "articles". There's articles there back to 1999...it was interesting flipping through the week-by-week summary of that season, all the way to that playoff nightmare in Tennessee. Even more interesting to look at the season predictions for each year.

Posted
It was more of a general comment directed to anyone who can answer it.

 

I guess that's why I jumped on this "article."  If you're going to bash a team, at least get your facts straight! :blink:

398332[/snapback]

Er...maybe respond to the author of the article as opposed to the messenger?

 

Just a thought...

Posted
Er...maybe respond to the author of the article as opposed to the messenger?

 

Just a thought...

My question was directed to all readers of the thread.

 

To NG, that could be. Johnson hasn't been Pro Bowl-caliber since the late '90s, though.

Posted
Not doomed.  Just that the SB wins are likely over.

Going out on a limb again?

 

"One of 31 teams that AREN'T the Patriots is going to win the Super Bowl this year."

 

Didn't that limb break last year when you GUARANTEED that the Colts would beat the Pats in the playoffs, and then you GUARANTEED that the Steelers would beat the Pats in the playoffs?

 

:):angry::D

Posted
Going out on a limb again?

It's much less of one than predicting the Pats would lose to the Colts. Or isn't it? I don't know. How's about we make a wager on the Pats NOT repeating again as SB champs, shall we, seeing as you're so confident I'll be wrong.

 

Didn't think so. :):angry::D

×
×
  • Create New...