Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't see Burns making the team. All the other backs have looked better.

 

Parrish will rip off a couple of big gainers in pre-season to rate no worse than 4th by opening day.

Posted

Its kind o fdeceiving, because that is based on your basic 2 WR, TE, RB, FB set...it really doesnt take into account a slot receiver...

Posted
Its kind o fdeceiving, because that is based on your basic 2 WR, TE, RB, FB set...it really doesnt take into account a slot receiver...

396652[/snapback]

Which outta be our base... Power running - don't forget

 

But anyway - the Joe Burns thing is a surprise as I've read nothing about Burns this camp. It;s all been Gates, Lee, Goldberry and Williams. We need a camp-ite to study Joe Burns for us.

Posted
Which outta be our base... Power running - don't forget

 

But anyway - the Joe Burns thing is a surprise as I've read nothing about Burns this camp. It;s all been Gates, Lee, Goldberry and Williams.  We need a camp-ite to study Joe Burns for us.

396654[/snapback]

Yah i agree with you on the RB's...i havent seen anything in the past 2 years that say Joe Burns will turn out to be anything worthwhile...why is he #2? Shaud showed more last season that burns ever has...

Posted

DREW DREW DREW DREW!!!! Haddad that is! ;)

 

Seriously though...looks like this might be the end of the road for my fellow UB alumnus. :devil:

Posted

Also, I'd like to have Woodbury take Matthews' spot. The kid is built like EM and looks capable of playing RB/WR as well .

Posted
Also, I'd like to have Woodbury take Matthews' spot.  The kid is built like EM and looks capable of playing RB/WR as well .

396675[/snapback]

 

I'm with you on this one...develop the kid, because if we're relying on our #3 to win some games, we're !@#$ as it is...

×
×
  • Create New...