erynthered Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 You are such a turd. 385696[/snapback] I have a friend named Mark, who would differ from that............. Some here miss him.
cåblelady Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 I have a friend named Mark, who would differ from that............. 385713[/snapback] He'd probably call you worse.
ATBNG Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 Doh! Youse guys got me! Damn that realignment! 385707[/snapback] I'm not taking the second bet - they really could be very bad. We actually agree there. Their pass defense was beyond hideous last year. I respect though what McNair brings to the table if he's 80-100% healthwise.
MadBuffaloDisease Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 I'm not taking the second bet - they really could be very bad. We actually agree there. Their pass defense was beyond hideous last year. I figured they'd be worse than the year before. But after looking up that website that mentioned their FA loses!, whoa boy! I'd be highly surprised if they finished out of the bottom-5. I respect though what McNair brings to the table if he's 80-100% healthwise. McNair is a warrior and a great player when healthy. But he's been battered these last few years and is no spring chicken anymore. He also needs someone to throw the ball to. Most of his dependable receivers (Wychek and Mason) are gone, McCariens was a decent player, and Troupe is injured. Bennett is a good player, but he has to prove he can be a #1 WR, and still, he can't do it alone.
Recommended Posts