Alaska Darin Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Paul Harvey In Pennsylvania, you are about 50% more likely to die from an infection you get while spending time in a hospital than you are to die from a firearm (over 300% more likely to die from an in-hospital infection than a homicide involving a firearm (1800 infection deaths/about 500 homicides)). I wonder why they don't report EVERY DAMN ONE OF THOSE on the evening news? [/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Paul Harvey In Pennsylvania, you are about 50% more likely to die from an infection you get while spending time in a hospital than you are to die from a firearm (over 300% more likely to die from an in-hospital infection than a homicide involving a firearm (1800 infection deaths/about 500 homicides)). I wonder why they don't report EVERY DAMN ONE OF THOSE on the evening news? [/sarcasm] 381336[/snapback] Because guns are bad, hospitals are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Paul Harvey In Pennsylvania, you are about 50% more likely to die from an infection you get while spending time in a hospital than you are to die from a firearm (over 300% more likely to die from an in-hospital infection than a homicide involving a firearm (1800 infection deaths/about 500 homicides)). I wonder why they don't report EVERY DAMN ONE OF THOSE on the evening news? [/sarcasm] 381336[/snapback] But how many of those who died from nonsocomial infections were put in the hospital by guns? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 When infections are outlawed only outlaws will have infections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 When infections are outlawed only outlaws will have infections? 381381[/snapback] And Michael Vick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachChuckDickerson Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 In Pennsylvania, you are about 50% more likely to die from an infection you get while spending time in a hospital than you are to die from a firearm (over 300% more likely to die from an in-hospital infection than a homicide involving a firearm (1800 infection deaths/about 500 homicides)).381336[/snapback] If something bad ever happens to me in PA please shove me in the car and drive me to NY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich in Ohio Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Because guns are bad, hospitals are not. 381369[/snapback] Hospitals don't kill people....people kill people. The exact same arguement that normal people have made about guns since I have been alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PTS Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Because guns are bad, hospitals are not. 381369[/snapback] Guns don't kill people, Abortions kill people. Where do abortions happen, in hospital clinics. It's all a vast left wing conspircy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 If something bad ever happens to me in PA please shove me in the car and drive me to NY. 381395[/snapback] NY hospitals aren't much better. Actually, there's very few urban hospitals in the nation that don't have problems with nonsocomial infections; they're very good breeding grounds for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts