Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 To the extent that one defines a "minuteman" as a patriot who fights to defend his homeland, in THEIR minds these insurgents are just that. Except that a good many Iraqis realize that a lot of the "freedom fighters" are actually foreigners imported to prosecute their jihad, and don't give a damn about Iraqis. As often as not, Moore's "Minutemen" are more analogous to...oh, I don't know. Maybe the French in the Revolutionary War: couldn't give two ***** about American independence, save for the effect it had in weakening England. I heard a woman screaming on at the scene today: "MY GOD, THE AMERICANS ARE BLOWING US UP." Doesn't matter that it's not true. It matters that they THINK it's true. And what will follow is more hatred against America and eventually the prophecy that Iraq harbors future terrorists will be very true. 381179[/snapback] That, however, is true enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reuben Gant Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Rambo II: First Blood Part III. That's the one where he rams the helicopter with a tank. Not the worst movie I've ever seen...but easily the worst movie I've ever seen in the theater. Except maybe Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy this past spring... Ghost Wars by Steven (or Stephen) Coll is a good read on the US (and Pakistani, and Saudi) involvement in Afghanistan from about '79 to '01. Taliban, by Ahmed Rashid, is another excellent book on the rise of the Tailban (Rashid's an excellent read in particular - he's a Pakistani journalist who's spent maybe two decades covering Afghanistan; great sources, great perspective, and very objective, particularly considering how close he is to events). I'm not going to claim those two books together can explain Afghanistan...but I will say that those books will demonstrate precisely how thoroughly !@#$ed up the politics of that region is. 381185[/snapback] Rams the Helicoptor with a Tank? Yes, that seems right, I think I took my nephew to see that. Thanks for the tips on the books, much appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blzrul Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Except that a good many Iraqis realize that a lot of the "freedom fighters" are actually foreigners imported to prosecute their jihad, and don't give a damn about Iraqis. As often as not, Moore's "Minutemen" are more analogous to...oh, I don't know. Maybe the French in the Revolutionary War: couldn't give two ***** about American independence, save for the effect it had in weakening England.That, however, is true enough. 381190[/snapback] Yes but in the end, as usual, the little children suffer whilst we speak of semantics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich in Ohio Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I Googled Michael Moore minute men and got this :In his own words "...The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not "insurgents" or "terrorists" or "The Enemy." They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow -- and they will win. Get it, Mr. Bush?..." This is directly from michaelmoore.com. 380987[/snapback] aww, the radical left crowd will not allow something as simple as the facts get in the way of thier support for the insurgent murders. Not so much that they support the murder of children directly...but the do love it when things go badly for GWB and the USA in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 aww, the radical left crowd will not allow something as simple as the facts get in the way of thier support for the insurgent murders. Not so much that they support the murder of children directly...but the do love it when things go badly for GWB and the USA in general. 381218[/snapback] What exactly are the facts here in this thread, Rich? That people, including a bunch of innocent kids, died? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 How do you know what winning is? Or how can you say we are loosing?Neither has been well defined. It is looking that loosing right now would mean a failed state building project- and winning a successful state building project- but I can't speak for my Commander in Cheif. 381186[/snapback] Losing. LOSING. Sorry. Pet peeve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Regardless of your being in jest, I have to point out that the Afghan Mujahadeen was a lot more complex than the US supporting everyone against the USSR. And technically, the Taliban didn't even exist until about 1994 or so...Reagan couldn't have supported them without inventing time travel. 381167[/snapback] Reagan was the best president this nation has ever seen, and I can't believe you're insinuating that he DIDN'T invent time travel. [/insanity] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicot Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Radical Islam was different last year? 381106[/snapback] Radical Islam? You do realise that a large part of the insurgency is down to ex-Baathists who certainly are not motivated by radical Islam, Baathism being very much a secular movement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Radical Islam? You do realise that a large part of the insurgency is down to ex-Baathists who certainly are not motivated by radical Islam, Baathism being very much a secular movement? 381342[/snapback] Insurgency...laughable. The people fighting us now are largely Jordanians, Syrians, Saudis and Iranian instigators. The Baathists are but a small minority within this "insurgency". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicot Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Insurgency...laughable. The people fighting us now are largely Jordanians, Syrians, Saudis and Iranian instigators. The Baathists are but a small minority within this "insurgency". 381396[/snapback] Is that why the vast majority of people being held in Iraq by the US are actually Iraqis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavin in Va Beach Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 It seems pretty laughable to just write off the insurgents as 'foreigners' as if they've come in like they own the place and are holding the entire Iraqi population hostage. And somebody must be housing them and providing them with bases(for lack of a better word) in which to stage their missions. I doubt they are pitching tents outside of town. The foreign insurgents are welcomed with open arms by at least some Iraqis... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicot Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 It seems pretty laughable to just write off the insurgents as 'foreigners' as if they've come in like they own the place and are holding the entire Iraqi population hostage. And somebody must be housing them and providing them with bases(for lack of a better word) in which to stage their missions. I doubt they are pitching tents outside of town. The foreign insurgents are welcomed with open arms by at least some Iraqis... 381415[/snapback] I agree (this is a sure sign the apocalypse is upon us). There is almost certainly some cooperation between elements of the homegrown insurgency and the foreign jihadis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich in Ohio Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 It's not silly, it's "important"! Because there's "idiots" who don't like MM, and they quoted something stupid he said! And I won't stand for it! He doesn't actually like the forces fighting and killing our soldiers - he doesn't want them to win, even though he says they will - he just compared them to the heroes who risked their lives to found our nation because, because ... GAAAAHHH! 381127[/snapback] Everything that the fat pig mickael moore says falls into one of these three catagories; 1) a flat out lie 2) An ignorant statement that has no basis in fact (see item 1) above) 3) Pure hate rhetoric which comes from his desire to be right at the expense of the rest of the normal people in the USA What moore is there to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich in Ohio Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Insurgency...laughable. The people fighting us now are largely Jordanians, Syrians, Saudis and Iranian instigators. The Baathists are but a small minority within this "insurgency". 381396[/snapback] I agree with your assement JSP. I will also add that their dayd are numbered, and thier numbers are dwindling. On a good week we eliminate 50 to 60 of these sub-humans, and on a great week we get a few hundred of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Is that why the vast majority of people being held in Iraq by the US are actually Iraqis? 381403[/snapback] Nah. It probably has something to do with numbers. You know, since there are 24 MILLION Iraqis and not more than a few thousand "insurgents" is stands to reason that there may actually be more Iraqis in jail. It's a ratio thing. Perhaps they don't teach math on the island? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicot Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Nah. It probably has something to do with numbers. You know, since there are 24 MILLION Iraqis and not more than a few thousand "insurgents" is stands to reason that there may actually be more Iraqis in jail. It's a ratio thing. Perhaps they don't teach math on the island? 381460[/snapback] What are you going on about ?! I was not talking about Iraqis in "jail", I was talking about those Iraqis being held by the US for being part of the insurgency. As US spokesmen confirm time and again, the vast majority of those are Iraqi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pope zimli Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 I guess the "insurgents" have more on their agenda than getting the U.S. to leave Iraq: "At least 26 Iraqis, almost all of them children, have been killed by a suicide car bombing in south-eastern Baghdad. A US soldier is also said to have died in the blast. Another three US soldiers are reported to have been injured. A car drove up to a US army vehicle and blew up as troops gave sweets to the children, a witness said. Hundreds of Iraqis have died in attacks by militants opposed to the US presence and a Shia-led government that took charge in Baghdad earlier this year. "Many Iraqi civilians, mostly children, were around the Humvee at the time of the blast," US military spokesman Sgt David Abrams told the Reuters news agency. "Suddenly a suicide car bomber drove round from a side street and blew himself up," he said." 380941[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 What are you going on about ?! I was not talking about Iraqis in "jail", I was talking about those Iraqis being held by the US for being part of the insurgency. As US spokesmen confirm time and again, the vast majority of those are Iraqi. 381464[/snapback] So you're saying your own countrymen are blowing THEMSELVES up to make a point about US leaving? Sorry, I don't buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicot Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 Nah. It probably has something to do with numbers. You know, since there are 24 MILLION Iraqis and not more than a few thousand "insurgents" is stands to reason that there may actually be more Iraqis in jail. It's a ratio thing. Perhaps they don't teach math on the island? 381460[/snapback] This is what I meant: Few foreign fighters in Iraq "Suspected foreign fighters account for less than 2% of the 5,700 captives being held as security threats in Iraq, a strong indication that Iraqis are largely responsible for the stubborn insurgency." Yes, I know the article is a year old but I somewhat doubt that the number of foreigners being held has increased so that it is now 50% of the total number or anything like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pope zimli Posted July 14, 2005 Share Posted July 14, 2005 oh...innocent people get killed in war. Wow. I remember pictures of My Lai and the little girl who was so horribly burned by napalm. Wake up, Pollyanna. We should have thought of that before we went in if it bothered us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts