Talonz Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Vikings | Super Bowl Here We Come: P. Williams Sun, 10 Jul 2005 06:14:11 -0700 Paul J. Letlow, of the News Star, reports Minnesota Vikings DT Pat Williams is very confident of the team's chances in 2005. "Oh, we're going to the Super Bowl," Williams said. "Mark that down. Tell everybody. 'We're going to the Super Bowl.' We'll be in Detroit." The team signed him to clog the middle along with All-Pro DT Kevin Williams. Williams was hurt when the Buffalo Bills did not re-sign him. "It was hard when they decided not to re-sign me," Williams said. "They hurt me some. But management there now isn't good." Williams likes the leadership in Minnesota saying the major free agent acquisitions by the Vikings are all leaders. Williams said he signed with Minnesota for a chance to get "the ring."
Joe in NC Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Don't get too excited yet Pat, last I looked Mike Tice is still the coach. Looking for another .500 season for the Purple People Eaters.
MDH Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Don't get too excited yet Pat, last I looked Mike Tice is still the coach. Looking for another .500 season for the Purple People Eaters. 378452[/snapback] Pat knew that by choosing the Vikes that he'll have a great shot at going to the Super Bowl this year....all he's got to do is buy some tickets from Tice.
Talonz Posted July 11, 2005 Author Posted July 11, 2005 Pat knew that by choosing the Vikes that he'll have a great shot at going to the Super Bowl this year....all he's got to do is buy some tickets from Tice. 378458[/snapback]
canbuffan34 Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Vikings | Super Bowl Here We Come: P. WilliamsSun, 10 Jul 2005 06:14:11 -0700 Paul J. Letlow, of the News Star, reports Minnesota Vikings DT Pat Williams is very confident of the team's chances in 2005. "Oh, we're going to the Super Bowl," Williams said. "Mark that down. Tell everybody. 'We're going to the Super Bowl.' We'll be in Detroit." The team signed him to clog the middle along with All-Pro DT Kevin Williams. Williams was hurt when the Buffalo Bills did not re-sign him. "It was hard when they decided not to re-sign me," Williams said. "They hurt me some. But management there now isn't good." Williams likes the leadership in Minnesota saying the major free agent acquisitions by the Vikings are all leaders. Williams said he signed with Minnesota for a chance to get "the ring." 378449[/snapback] Maybe Fat Pat doesn't realize he's in the NFC now! Even if his new team does make it to the SB, they'll just get creamed by whatever AFC team emerges out of the battlefield of a more dominating conference!
Nanker Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Pat knew that by choosing the Vikes that he'll have a great shot at going to the Super Bowl this year....all he's got to do is buy some tickets from Tice. 378458[/snapback] You say sumphfin'?
1billsfan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Sorry loser, without Moss the Vikings will be no where near the Superbowl in Detriot.
obie_wan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Vikings | Super Bowl Here We Come: P. WilliamsSun, 10 Jul 2005 06:14:11 -0700 Paul J. Letlow, of the News Star, reports Minnesota Vikings DT Pat Williams is very confident of the team's chances in 2005. "Oh, we're going to the Super Bowl," Williams said. "Mark that down. Tell everybody. 'We're going to the Super Bowl.' We'll be in Detroit." The team signed him to clog the middle along with All-Pro DT Kevin Williams. Williams was hurt when the Buffalo Bills did not re-sign him. "It was hard when they decided not to re-sign me," Williams said. "They hurt me some. But management there now isn't good." Williams likes the leadership in Minnesota saying the major free agent acquisitions by the Vikings are all leaders. Williams said he signed with Minnesota for a chance to get "the ring." 378449[/snapback] fat, old , slow and studid is no way to go thru like, son.
DeeRay Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 So what's the big deal? Pat speaks the truth. Bills management sucks!! I mean after 4 years of Donahoe, what do we have? Not even .500. What's to argue? So all you optimists tell me is the glass less than half empty or is the glass almost half full?
IDBillzFan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 So all you optimists tell me is the glass less than half empty or is the glass almost half full? 378514[/snapback] Tell me again why I should be a pessimist like you? Why don't you like TD?
1billsfan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 I mean after 4 years of Donahoe, what do we have? Not even .500. What's to argue? 378514[/snapback] Um...we were 9-7 last year.
zow2 Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 If Fat Pat really thought management "was not good" in Buffalo then why would he be hurt when they didn't resign him? You'd think he would want to run as far away from Buffalo as he could. Now he's in Minnesota with an owner that mouths off at the team on occassion and a head coach that got caught scalping tickets for the Superbowl....a big NFL no no.
IDBillzFan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Um...we were 9-7 last year. 378528[/snapback] Fairly certain he's talking about overall record, because what happened years ago is what helps his argument.
stuckincincy Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 PW was a decent sort when he was here. Maybe Son of Satan made a voodoo doll of him when he left and is sticking in some pins.
DeeRay Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Fairly certain he's talking about overall record, because what happened years ago is what helps his argument. So what's the argument dude??? Was Pat Williams talking about management "last year" or during his service under this regime? If his talking about management and the initial post was that he slammed Donahoe, so he was, then let's take a look at Donahoe's record with the Bills... I did the math and it's under .500. So, again, what's to argue?
IDBillzFan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 So what's the argument dude??? Was Pat Williams talking about management "last year" or during his service under this regime? If his talking about management and the initial post was that he slammed Donahoe, so he was, then let's take a look at Donahoe's record with the Bills... I did the math and it's under .500. So, again, what's to argue? 378546[/snapback] First argument, dude, is that Pat Williams disappointment in management clearly had nothing to do with TD's W/L and everything to do with TD not giving him the money he felt he deserved. So if we gave Williams more money, the'd still be here. And then he wouldn't have a problem with management, would he? His problem with management, if he really had one at all (which is clearly not evident in a conflicting statement like he made above) was about the money, not the win-loss record. If we gave him the money, he'd be standing in Buffalo right now saying "We're going to the Super Bowl next year." But you see it as a way to judge TD based on W/L when it has absolutely, positively nothing to do with TD's W/L record. Not to mention that judging TD strictly on his W/L record is a terrible way to judge a football GM.
1billsfan Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 First argument, dude, is that Pat Williams disappointment in management clearly had nothing to do with TD's W/L and everything to do with TD not giving him the money he felt he deserved. So if we gave Williams more money, the'd still be here. And then he wouldn't have a problem with management, would he? His problem with management, if he really had one at all (which is clearly not evident in a conflicting statement like he made above) was about the money, not the win-loss record. If we gave him the money, he'd be standing in Buffalo right now saying "We're going to the Super Bowl next year." But you see it as a way to judge TD based on W/L when it has absolutely, positively nothing to do with TD's W/L record. Not to mention that judging TD strictly on his W/L record is a terrible way to judge a football GM. 378554[/snapback] But c'mon now, don't you know? Pat speaks the truth!
stuckincincy Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 But you see it as a way to judge TD based on W/L when it has absolutely, positively nothing to do with TD's W/L record. Not to mention that judging TD strictly on his W/L record is a terrible way to judge a football GM. 378554[/snapback] Not from the paying public's perspective...
BuffaloRebound Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 PW needs to shut his mouth already. We get it... you wanted to stay in Buffalo, the GM didn't give in to your demands, and now you are like a crazy ex-girlfriend. Get over it.
Ramius Posted July 11, 2005 Posted July 11, 2005 Give it up pat, its getting rather pathetic...you WRE a class player, when did that go away?
Recommended Posts