Alaska Darin Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 What you wrote: I am not responsible for your ignorance nor the stupidity of your band of sycophants who shortly will join your amen chorus 376650[/snapback] What I see: Grrrblah Grrrrblah <spittle> Huglablah RRRR <spittle>
VABills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 What you wrote: What I see: 376659[/snapback] Well the suns not up yet in Alaska. Give it a couple more hours and then you'll see better.
Alaska Darin Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Well the suns not up yet in Alaska. Give it a couple more hours and then you'll see better. 376666[/snapback] Uh, it's summer. The sun doesn't go down. Geographic tard.
UConn James Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Check to see if Babelfish has an Beausox-to-English translator.
VABills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Uh, it's summer. The sun doesn't go down. Geographic tard. 376669[/snapback] Oh I am sorry forgot to put the sarcasm thing at the end of my post. Did I confuse your little brain? Oh and don't get too much of a tan.
Chilly Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I hate to mention it due to the tragedy of the situation. With that being said, I do think that this bodes well for Bush and the Republicans.
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Oh I am sorry forgot to put the sarcasm thing at the end of my post. Did I confuse your little brain? Oh and don't get too much of a tan. 376674[/snapback] You're such his little geographical b*tch today VA He's making hay while the sun shines. I heard it grows real big in the valley?
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I hate to mention it due to the tragedy of the situation. With that being said, I do think that this bodes well for Bush and the Republicans. 376677[/snapback] Good for business. Exactly... Fighters always want a good fight.
VABills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Good for business. Exactly... Fighters always want a good fight. 376710[/snapback] And losers always lose.
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Not sure if this was brought up? Do you think they had things ready to go in both Paris and London... Seeing which would win the 2012 bid? In the terrorists childish wisdom... Saying, see what we can do? Security is an issue... But, from what I heard it was a non-issue in the bidding war between the two? ???
ExiledInIllinois Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 And losers always lose. 376713[/snapback] Totally agree!
RkFast Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 People around here really need to stop filling in gaps and omissions (omitted for the reason that every post can't be 75 paragraphs long, unless you're FFS) for themselves while reading. 376507[/snapback] You write this here and then in the now closed "Under attack" thread say I stated "that terrorism aparrently can be stomped out 100 percent " Youve got some set of balls.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Check to see if Babelfish has an Beausox-to-English translator. 376672[/snapback] Just curious...have the left and right on this board finally found a topic to agree on; namely, that beausox is a babbling idiot?
Mickey Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Are you familiar with Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Did Japan come after us after we wiped out two of their cities, or did they realize they had no chance of beating us so they surrended right away? The only way to defeat terrorism is to destroy terrorism all the way down to its roots. The longer we let these bastards roam the Earth, the more likely something beyond our worst nightmares will happen. And do you think use using a WMD will trigger them to do the same? They don't play by the rules. I'm sure using a WMD on a western target is their top project RIGHT NOW. 376568[/snapback] You are comparing a conflict between nation states with a conflict between nations and terrorists. They are not the same. Terrorists do not hold territory, they do not defend cities or encampments. They do not even have the courtesy to wear a uniform so we know who they are. At least the Germans and the Japanese were decent enought to wear uniforms. I am all for killing every terrorist on sight. Just give me their names and addresses, all of them and I will join right in. The problem isn't that we aren't tough enough. Needles in haystacks, that is the problem.
beausox Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 From MP George Galloway (of Oil for Food scandal fame) notes: "We urge the government to remove people in this country from harms way, as the Spanish government... {did}... by ending occupation of Iraq and by turning its full attention to the development of a real solution to the wider conflicts in the Middle East"
CoachChuckDickerson Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Are you familiar with Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Did Japan come after us after we wiped out two of their cities, or did they realize they had no chance of beating us so they surrended right away? The only way to defeat terrorism is to destroy terrorism all the way down to its roots. The longer we let these bastards roam the Earth, the more likely something beyond our worst nightmares will happen. And do you think use using a WMD will trigger them to do the same? They don't play by the rules. I'm sure using a WMD on a western target is their top project RIGHT NOW. 376568[/snapback] maybe I am not as smart as you but where exactly is this area that we nuke with a WMD to defeat terrorism?
Alaska Darin Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 maybe I am not as smart as you but where exactly is this area that we nuke with a WMD to defeat terrorism? 376844[/snapback] Just the whole Middle East. You see, if we kill all the brown people, that'll end terrorism. No one will be the least bit angry if we do this, nor will they become terrorists against us, for they'll have seen what our response will be. Also, a nuclear explosion won't have any effect on oil in the region. I promise. If you have a question in your mind on why people like Nancy Pelosi and Trent Lott get elected, go back and read this thread again.
UConn James Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 You write this here and then in the now closed "Under attack" thread say I stated "that terrorism aparrently can be stomped out 100 percent " Youve got some set of balls. 376745[/snapback] You're the one who lashed out with a charge of cowardice when the guy said that we must all learn to accept that terrorism in this world will happen, and that we need to deal with it (I don't know the context of what he said otherwise, and that's not what was being spoken about). That, to me and other readers of English, means that you didn't agree with him, and that you don't accept that a certain level of terrorism will happen. I didn't put words in your mouth. You did.
Johnny Coli Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I sure hope the IRA isn't behind today's bombings. I have to go to Ireland in a month, and I don't want to show up and find a big hole in the ground. We should have killed all those Irish Catholics when we had the chance.
VABills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I sure hope the IRA isn't behind today's bombings. I have to go to Ireland in a month, and I don't want to show up and find a big hole in the ground. We should have killed all those Irish Catholics when we had the chance. 376853[/snapback] Watch it tard boy.
Recommended Posts