spidey Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 According to this link posted by Nick:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4659093.stm CW 376285[/snapback] Early in anything like this many groups make claims that they are the culprits. Let the authoritieis settle it out. For those affected be safe and know that we are with you.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Early in anything like this many groups make claims that they are the culprits. Let the authoritieis settle it out. For those affected be safe and know that we are with you. 376288[/snapback] You kill me man. Always assuming the best from Muslim Extremists.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 And once upon a time, we immediately would have blamed the Irish, as well... 376276[/snapback] I think it was clear from the outset it was not the IRA.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 Nick, I know seems trivial but how are you going to get home? Also, was the bus a tourist bus or regular London transport 376278[/snapback] I haven't worked that out yet. I may have to walk home. It will take a LONG time whatever.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 Early in anything like this many groups make claims that they are the culprits. Let the authoritieis settle it out. For those affected be safe and know that we are with you. 376288[/snapback] Well aQ seems a reasonable assumption to me... The continues to be speculation that they are to blame. Thanks for your words of support. We are not yet in the blame process here - waiting to figure out what happens next.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 BBC are speculating the Bus bombing was a suicide bomber. Irish terrorism has been ruled out. The Secret Service are fuming apparantly. News reports say that they took pride in having prevented such attacks until now. Safe to say they are taking this seriously.
spidey Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 You kill me man. Always assuming the best from Muslim Extremists. 376290[/snapback] So your answer would be to let some Nukes fly all over the middle east? But reasoning with someone brainwashed like yourself is a waste of space.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 A 'number' of people have died in the explosion at Edgeware Road - per BBC. Numbers look set to rise and rise.
Fezmid Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 So your answer would be to let some Nukes fly all over the middle east? But reasoning with someone brainwashed like yourself is a waste of space. 376296[/snapback] Take your arguing to a separate thread or through PMs. This isn't the place. CW
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 So your answer would be to let some Nukes fly all over the middle east? But reasoning with someone brainwashed like yourself is a waste of space. 376296[/snapback] No, but it wouldn't be to cut and run as I'm SURE you would like us to do.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 So your answer would be to let some Nukes fly all over the middle east? But reasoning with someone brainwashed like yourself is a waste of space. 376296[/snapback] I don't think he was saying that at all....
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I think it was clear from the outset it was not the IRA. 376291[/snapback] Not my point (when's the last time the IRA set off bombs in london, anyway? '89?) Point being, we should all know by now that the initial reports are ALWAYS fraught with confusion and and a lack of information, so why start jumping to conclusions now? We've got plenty of time to worry about "who", it's not exactly an immediate concern...
VABills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Not my point (when's the last time the IRA set off bombs in london, anyway? '89?) Point being, we should all know by now that the initial reports are ALWAYS fraught with confusion and and a lack of information, so why start jumping to conclusions now? We've got plenty of time to worry about "who", it's not exactly an immediate concern... 376302[/snapback] CTM, you are wrong. It is, as you want to identify who and if it is a certain organization, you want to bottle up any known suspects from that organization immediately, to prevent further attacks.
nick in* england Posted July 7, 2005 Author Posted July 7, 2005 How can anyone survive this sort of attack? - See link http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/4127700...lose_reader.jpg
CosmicBills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Best wishes to all the people of the UK this morning.
UConn James Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 ABC is saying that the time of the attack from a cell phone recovered in an unexploded bomb was 8:49 a.m. Familiar number? NYC and Madrid. Hang in there, Nick. Our thoughts are with you 'English types' today.
Crap Throwing Monkey Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 CTM, you are wrong. It is, as you want to identify who and if it is a certain organization, you want to bottle up any known suspects from that organization immediately, to prevent further attacks. 376304[/snapback] VA, there's a difference between public speculation and actual investigation.
Dwight Drane Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 Good luck Nick...and everyone else, heads up. These guys are smart and I would expect something else very soon. Either today, or over the next few weeks. The US Govt doesn't get everyone worked up with warnings because of all the hooplah it created over the past few years, but it is safe to say a tacet code red is up.
CosmicBills Posted July 7, 2005 Posted July 7, 2005 I hope they find the lead on whatever cell(s) are in London and let the SAS sort 'em out. You know those guys are chomping at the bit right about now.
Recommended Posts