Fake-Fat Sunny Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 It might have happened and been talked about while I was in Denver and then in DC during the last couple of weeks but I just noticed that Bannan's position on the roster is now G/DT instead of simply G as it was this winter. From the way TD talked about him (when he referred to him as "Jason" Bannan-not a good sign if he is hoping to be part of the GM's plans) I thought he might revert back to him being solely listed as a DT or at least DT/G rather than G/DT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 Things won't be certain until the end of training camp. I like this guy and I hope he sticks around. He's an old school playa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLocke Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 It seemed to me that when TD was talking during the draft that Bannan would be playing DT because it would give him the best chance to remain on the roster. It seemed that what TD was implying was that there is better depth at guard than defensive tackle, so give Bannan the best chance to stick on the roster by puting him back at DT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick in* england Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 I brought this up a few days ago... My thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerJ Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 If Jason Bannan is being listed as a G/T, I wonder where that leaves Justin Peters in TD's plans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 6, 2005 Share Posted July 6, 2005 If Jason Bannan is being listed as a G/T, I wonder where that leaves Justin Peters in TD's plans. 375695[/snapback] Or Jason Peters for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts