CoachChuckDickerson Posted July 6, 2005 Posted July 6, 2005 ...one of the idiots finds a 30 foot space between me and the car in front of me, so he sprints across, as I'm cursing him for taking that chance. He must have had his dog with him, because before I knew it, a dog hits the side of my car. Unfortunately, he didn't make it. The poor thing went under my rear tire, he must have hit the bottom part of the door and straight down.374801[/snapback] Maybe the guy was running away from a dog that was chasing him and you saved the guys life. Think of the glass as half full.
TigerJ Posted July 6, 2005 Posted July 6, 2005 Curious, any effort to find an owner? If possible, it's usually nice to save some little kids the experience of not knowing what happened to their pet. 375817[/snapback] The cat I hit was the only pet I've ever hit. Had it died immediately I would have stopped, but I wasn't about to chase it into the brush to find out what happened. It looked very much alive running off the road.
Arkady Renko Posted July 6, 2005 Posted July 6, 2005 I would argue that not knowing is sometimes/often preferable. 375829[/snapback] Is it? Not to say the two situations are equivalent, but those who have missing children seem to prefer knowing what happen. I would rather know the truth, myself.
Arkady Renko Posted July 6, 2005 Posted July 6, 2005 The cat I hit was the only pet I've ever hit. Had it died immediately I would have stopped, but I wasn't about to chase it into the brush to find out what happened. It looked very much alive running off the road. 375999[/snapback] I was asking the original poster, if that was not clear. I do in fact care about what you have to say, but I just wanted to make sure you did not feel like I was attacking you in particular.
Recommended Posts