jkeerie Posted Saturday at 09:11 PM Posted Saturday at 09:11 PM 1 minute ago, GunnerBill said: Yea the oline spots feel pretty locked up.... Dion, Spencer, Grable and VanDemark..... OT looks settled. Sure we all want skill players...but the reason we have one of the best olines is because Beane makes moves like this. Our oline depth is solid. 1 3 1 Quote
buffblue Posted Saturday at 09:12 PM Posted Saturday at 09:12 PM Just now, SoonerBillsFan said: That teams will jump and stop Especially when the receiver gives it away pre snap by positioning their feet sideways toward the quarterback. It's unbelievably easy to predict even just watching on TV lol. Shakir does it every time, as did Diggs when he was here. 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted Saturday at 09:12 PM Posted Saturday at 09:12 PM One more pick then we get to decide who is going to be our next hall of famer in the UDFA process. -5000 odds on the favorite being a WR UDFA 1 2 Quote
LEBills Posted Saturday at 09:12 PM Posted Saturday at 09:12 PM (edited) 2 minutes ago, Nitro said: What need can they fill at this selection? Please share. Our WR5 is Shavers. We have drafted replacements for QMorris, Cam Lewis and maybe VanDemark/Grable. Feels like Shavers or maybe Buffalo Joe are the next weakest rostered players. Oh and a WR could replace Coddringtons spot. Edited Saturday at 09:13 PM by LEBills Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM 1 minute ago, Draconator said: Name one WR in this draft that we had a realistic chance to draft that would have more attempts, catches, and yards than our top 3 WRs currently on the roster. I bet you can't. Royals,Noel, williams for starters. Any one of them could have started opposite Coleman. Shakir is a slot period. 2 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM If Kromer wants the guy, I’m good 1 Quote
paulmm3 Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM This UConn OT looks like a BPA pick. Seems to be a bit higher on big boards I'm looking at then where we got him. And I have no problem with that. 1 Quote
KOKBILLS Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Just now, BillsFan130 said: I know nothing about the player, but I just don't understand the positional pick. He is gonna be a practice squad player as there's a log jam at tackle . Why not pick a guy who actually has a legit chance to Make the roster this year.. Punter? Speed Receiver? Linebacker depth? I don't think the Bills have resigned Morris yet, and they are specifically looking for a blocking TE... Hawes is arguably the best blocking TE in this Draft... Davidson is not a blocker and that's why Morris made the team ahead of him last year... I think folks who assumed the Bills were looking for an upgrade from Q Morris thought a pick like Hawes was coming some time in this Draft. 1 1 Quote
Draconator Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Posted Saturday at 09:13 PM Just now, SoonerBillsFan said: Royals,Noel, williams for starters. Any one of them could have started opposite Coleman. Shakir is a slot period. 1. You're wrong. 2. See #1 1 1 Quote
LyndonvilleBill Posted Saturday at 09:14 PM Posted Saturday at 09:14 PM 1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said: One more pick then we get to decide who is going to be our next hall of famer in the UDFA process. -5000 odds on the favorite being a WR UDFA Lets blow everyone's mind and grab Desmond Watson 😉😇🤣 1 Quote
Generic_Bills_Fan Posted Saturday at 09:15 PM Posted Saturday at 09:15 PM 1 minute ago, BillsFanForever19 said: We had a lot of needs. You can't force a pick if the value isn't there. Like i've said a million times, it just means they'll be looking at veterans post Draft for that extra spot instead of the Draft. If he doesn't bring in anyone else from the veteran market from here to Training Camp, it's fair to get upset. But it wasn't a great WR class to begin with. And the value was more elsewhere. Josh had to be exponentially more pissed off at the defense than his offensive weapons I am genuinely perplexed people don’t see it that way. The dude would have to put up 40-50 points to beat good teams. I don’t see how a 3rd or 4th round talent wr in a bad wr draft really would’ve put a dent in that Quote
BillsFanForever19 Posted Saturday at 09:16 PM Posted Saturday at 09:16 PM 4 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Luke Tenuta (spelling) part 2 My dude, it's pick two hunded and six. I simply can't wrap my head around throwing a multi post hissy fit over a glorified UDFA selection. No one we're taking here is the kind of talent that you want to rely on for a roster spot. The WR's that are the Best Available are guys who are listed as Priority Free Agents on their Draft profile. You'd prefer one of them over a veteran who is on the market now or may become available after the Draft? I don't. Quote
BillsFan130 Posted Saturday at 09:16 PM Posted Saturday at 09:16 PM 2 minutes ago, KOKBILLS said: I don't think the Bills have resigned Morris yet, and they are specifically looking for a blocking TE... Hawes is arguably the best blocking TE in this Draft... Davidson is not a blocker and that's why Morris made the team ahead of him last year... I think folks who assumed the Bills were looking for an upgrade from Q Morris thought a pick like Hawes was coming some time in this Draft. I was referring to the Tackle pick, in the 6th round. The tight end pick makes sense 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM 2 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said: Lets blow everyone's mind and grab Desmond Watson 😉😇🤣 Lol I have no interest in picking up that tub of goo for 5 dollars let alone an NFL contract 1 Quote
UKBillFan Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM 6 minutes ago, Draconator said: Name one WR in this draft that we had a realistic chance to draft that would have more attempts, catches, and yards than our top 3 WRs currently on the roster. I bet you can't. I was hopeful that Royals would offer something different to the WRs already on the roster. And the Bills had the perfect chance to draft him as well. 1 Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM 10 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: The fact he ignored WR help the entire draft is BS. Yah we get it your unhappy we didn't take a WR 1 1 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted Saturday at 09:18 PM Posted Saturday at 09:18 PM Just now, BillsFanForever19 said: My dude, it's pick two hunded and six. I simply can't wrap my head around throwing a multi post hissy fit over a glorified UDFA selection. No one we're taking here is the kind of talent that you want to rely on for a roster spot. The WR's that are the Best Available are guys who are listed as Priority Free Agents on their Draft profile. You'd prefer one of them over a veteran who is on the market now or may become available after the Draft? I don't. Lundt has way way better feet than Luke Tenuta did and its not even close 1 1 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted Saturday at 09:18 PM Posted Saturday at 09:18 PM I’m probably looking into Elijah Moore after the draft. He’s still out there and younger than half these dudes getting drafted. We are also a prime spot for WR who are UDFAs since we did not draft a WR and we have Josh. Quote
GunnerBill Posted Saturday at 09:19 PM Posted Saturday at 09:19 PM 9 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said: Luke Tenuta (spelling) part 2 Nah he is a LOT better than Luke Tenuta. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.