White Linen Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Well we’ve only drafted two of them so it’s not a lot to think about! Awe c'mon, you ruined it. I was leading him down a path, haha. 2 Quote
Since1981 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Simon said: Every single DL is a rotational piece. It's not a pejorative term Totally agree. DL is more a rotating puzzle during a game. Quote
NewEra Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, FireChans said: Argue the pros and cons of trading extra capital for a player who the best reasonable expectation is “rotational piece” on defense. Please and thanks. A guy like Milton Williams? He played under 50% of the snaps for the eagles If a player makes impact plays in key situations, being a “rotational piece” means nothing. If he doesn’t- then, it will be a bad pick/trade. Quote
Mister Defense Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Simon said: He's done nothing but hate on the Bills for years Yup, and there were likely only 2-3 players of the entire hundreds remaining that would would have not elicited the same exact reaction as his one here. Maybe 2-3.. 1 Quote
BeavercreekBillsFan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: The only reason these aren’t the drought years is Allen- Beane lucked into a HOF qb….if not for that he would have been gone long ago, with his track record 100% correct. Nailed that pick and has been living off of it since then 1 1 Quote
FireChans Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said: To be fair though: Any DL player we chose comes in essentially as a rotational piece, that is just how we run our DL here. Whether that is the right or wrong way to do it is fair to question, but it is how they use them, even Ed Not untrue, but that would make me question even more the logic of trading up for a guy to max out at 30-40% of the snaps? Just seems to me 80% of snaps is inherently more valuable than 30%. Quote
Since1981 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: Beane lucked into a HOF qb Yup. He gets credit for that too. Thank god for Beaney luck vs no luck. Quote
babulator Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: What? Ed Oliver is by far our best IDL. We'll see how TJ's game translates to the NFL. I'm not so sure there will be that much of a gap, by years end. Time will tell. Quote
DrDawkinstein Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Just now, PayDaBill$ said: Lol staying pat we were getting ZIP! This guy fills a need we swapped seconds dropped and picked up a third. Not the end of the world. We can’t roster all the picks we have anyway! Just now, One Buffalo said: Trade value charts show a pretty even trade, some a slightly higher value on the Bills side of the trade. Whether we needed to go up or not is another point entirely. But the trade was fine. The DL run started with our pick, so looks like Beane was able to get out ahead of it and lock in the guy he wanted. Wasnt going to be anything left by 56. Still plenty of time to draft a big body in the middle. 1 Quote
FLFan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: To be fair though: Any DL player we chose comes in essentially as a rotational piece, that is just how we run our DL here. Whether that is the right or wrong way to do it is fair to question, but it is how they use them, even Ed That’s the way the Eagles do it, for what’s that worth. 1 Quote
BigDingus Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago And this is why I say I don't like the Bills investing more early picks in D. I don't think a trade was necessary, but they honed in on the guy they wanted & paid extra to get him. Hope it pans out. Quote
<bills4life> Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, One Buffalo said: Trade value charts show a pretty even trade, some a slightly higher value on the Bills side of the trade. Whether we needed to go up or not is another point entirely. But the trade was fine. Yeah. Initially I thought they gave up both 2nds to move up with nothing in return. It was an equal trade 2 Quote
buffblue Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Success said: I see a lot of praise for his intelligence & leadership. Definitely a pattern for this regime - which I don't mind. True, but the same thing was said for Carter last year. He may be the forgotten man here bc in the first 5 games prior to injury he looked like he could be a player. Upon return...not so much 2 Quote
FireChans Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, NewEra said: A guy like Milton Williams? He played under 50% of the snaps for the eagles If a player makes impact plays in key situations, being a “rotational piece” means nothing. If he doesn’t- then, it will be a bad pick/trade. Did the Eagles trade up for Milton Williams? I can’t recall. I do know he wasn’t good enough to demand a second contract from them. Quote
QLBillsFan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 40 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said: This means NOTHING. I like Joe Marino.. but he is not football god either... Agree I also like JM but he’s one opinion 🤷🏻♂️, plenty of others thinks he’s a mid to late 2nd round pick .. Grant went 13 many thought he was 30-40. Once the first 12-15 went it’s my understanding the next group from 15-75 are similar and are about team fit. But I could be wrong 😆 Quote
DrDawkinstein Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Just now, FireChans said: Not untrue, but that would make me question even more the logic of trading up for a guy to max out at 30-40% of the snaps? Just seems to me 80% of snaps is inherently more valuable than 30%. So no drafting ANY DL early since everyone rotates? I cant keep up with all the posts in this thread, what position were you banging the table for that plays 80% of the snaps? Quote
somnus00 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago After the superbowl, everyone wanted a d-line that gets to the quarterback. This guy penetrates and gets in the backfield quick. 1 Quote
DrDawkinstein Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Just now, BigDingus said: And this is why I say I don't like the Bills investing more early picks in D. I don't think a trade was necessary, but they honed in on the guy they wanted & paid extra to get him. Hope it pans out. Look at the DL run between where we traded to and where we started at 56. Beane saw the run coming and got out ahead of it. 3 1 Quote
Shaw66 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Matt_In_NH said: I fully support beane but not sure about drafting DT. When they took Oliver there are many other DTs who have been better who were taken after him. We will see about sanders and Carter in time. I can't compare players, but I do know that one coach who played the Bills last year said that they set up their offensive scheme by first planning how they can contain Oliver. That's not a bad thing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.