Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

 

Better get prepared cause here comes more defense later in the draft haha. Still gotta get the obligatory LB pick in and another DT for sure.

1T Caldwell in the 5th. The rest is offense and punter.

Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

Two of our 5ths could get us to the top of the 4th. I'd be looking to do something like that for Royals, Felton, or Horton, whoever happens to still be on the board. I'll be disappointed if our vertical WR addition ends up being like Arian Smith in the 7th. I want a legit prospect.

 

Yeah those three receivers are the three I have my eye on too. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said:

He'll be there in the 5th. Go get Thornton @ 132.

I would be good with that, the burner WR. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, jahnyc said:

Xavier Watts would be a great pick in the 4th round if still there. 

a STEAL. I doubt it though shucks 

Posted
1 minute ago, JaCrispy said:

Had we just taken Collins instead of sanders, this draft would have been perfect so far 

Not an unreasonable thought.. do they go Caldwell at 132 ? 

Posted
1 minute ago, MasterStrategist said:

Which is why we are sticking to the same strategy -- that the Eagles used to force those punts.  Pressure with front 4- take away quick passing game.

 

This is the right move, it's a player e v a l issue if this doesn't work.  Which is my concern, Beane and staff haven't crushed DL historically but now just poured 5 new players into the equation ( so far): Bosa, Oji, Hoecht, Sanders, Jackson.

 

I thought they'd remake the secondary with more speed in FA.  Hit Max in draft, S is the weakness- guess they're counting on Bishop/DL to cause enough havoc to hide them.

 

I do understand the strategy. If you just look at the stats especially in the playoffs it seems obvious on the face of it we need defense more than offense. I still feel like over investing in the offense would have been an equally viable strategy, but they went in the more expected direction. I just hope all of the investments create a different result. We apparently don't want to give Allen that alpha that can make a clutch play for him at the end, so the defense needs to be good enough that we don't need that clutch play at the end.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nephilim17 said:

Get a speed WR, preferably one with size, and I'm happy with this draft.

I’d add in S, P and LB depth and I don’t think anyone could complain. Just have to hope the picks work out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, HappyDays said:

 

I do understand the strategy. If you just look at the stats especially in the playoffs it seems obvious on the face of it we need defense more than offense. I still feel like over investing in the offense would have been an equally viable strategy, but they went in the more expected direction. I just hope all of the investments create a different result. We apparently don't want to give Allen that alpha that can make a clutch play for him at the end, so the defense needs to be good enough that we don't need that clutch play at the end.

The depth on defense always seems to bury us…two years ago we lost all linebackers pretty much and last year we lost the one corner we just couldn’t lose 

Posted
12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Okay top player on my board has gone - Revel, which means time for a board update!!

 

1. Princely Umanmeilen^, DE, Ole Miss

2. Isaiah Bond^, WR, Texas

3. Shedeur Sanders, QB, Colorado

4. Xavier Watts, S, Notre Dame

5. Cam Williams, OT, Texas

6. Bradyn Swinson, DE, LSU

7. Marcus Mbow, IOL, Purdue

8. Charles Grant, OT, William & Mary

9. Elic Ayomanor, WR, Stanford

10. Jalen Royas, WR, Utah State

You are missing some kind of asterix next to Sanders...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

I do understand the strategy. If you just look at the stats especially in the playoffs it seems obvious on the face of it we need defense more than offense. I still feel like over investing in the offense would have been an equally viable strategy, but they went in the more expected direction. I just hope all of the investments create a different result. We apparently don't want to give Allen that alpha that can make a clutch play for him at the end, so the defense needs to be good enough that we don't need that clutch play at the end.

 

To be fair to them, there was not a ton of those guys in this draft. Most of the receivers in this class are #2s and #3s... complimentary players. I still want an outside guy with some speed from what is left but I don't expect any of those guys to become a true #1 alpha type.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...