I asked ChatGPT to Mock Round 1 - and the Bills select…

[That's No Moon]

6 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Haha ok soon as I read this I was like yeah, lets do that haha.  Here is the link to the results.  I only asked the top 20 posters and why, didn't ask for the worst...yet...lol.  

 

https://chatgpt.com/share/680727f4-1a90-8012-a159-fd40588192d9

That's No Moon

Engages in lighthearted threads, adding humor and levity to the forum.

Balances serious discussions with entertaining content.

 

Well played robot overlord....welll played....

[Alphadawg7]

3 hours ago, That's No Moon said:

It's an amazing tool if it's used properly and you understand what it can't do.  I use it at work often and it saves me a ton of time.  I try to teach my students how to use it properly to get the help they need more efficiently, not to write papers for them.  For example, we use a lot of historical texts and, for kids who are way behind grade level they are exceedingly difficult to understand.  ChatGPT allows them to have the text reworded for them instantly for the level they are currently at.  Then they can see the original and the essentially translated version side by side and it takes ZERO time to do it.

Yeah it’s been crazy what I’ve been able to do with it work wise, but even analyzing legal documents and things like comparing original drafts and redlined amended ones for potential issues and why.  Even my lawyer was floored, saved us a ton of time and money

[Sierra Foothills]

2 hours ago, hondo in seattle said:

Perplexity just did a mock for me and had us getting Princely Umanmielen (edge).

 

If that happened I'd be royally pissed.

 

[Neo]

7 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I’ve been down the rabbit hole using ChatGPT a ton the past couple months, but especially the last few weeks…it’s mind blowing.  

 

I’m with you.    Do you use the paid subscription version?   I do.    The world is remarkably changed and only now revealing itself.

[GunnerBill]

5 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Haha ok soon as I read this I was like yeah, lets do that haha.  Here is the link to the results.  I only asked the top 20 posters and why, didn't ask for the worst...yet...lol.  

 

https://chatgpt.com/share/680727f4-1a90-8012-a159-fd40588192d9

 

I always said AI was smart 😂

[GASabresIUFan]

9 hours ago, BisonMan said:

Tre Harris, WR, Ole Miss

I told it to assume no trades. I’m curious if others ask it what their results would be. 
 

Thoughts on this pick?

 

 

Like all software, garbage in garbage out. Ask it another another 50 times and see what happens.

Edited Tuesday at 11:37 AM by GASabresIUFan

[MJS]

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Haha ok soon as I read this I was like yeah, lets do that haha.  Here is the link to the results.  I only asked the top 20 posters and why, didn't ask for the worst...yet...lol.  

 

https://chatgpt.com/share/680727f4-1a90-8012-a159-fd40588192d9

Oh man, it basically just says that I make posts 🫤

[Cray51]

ChatGPT is great, but not the only tool out there that will blow your mind.  CoPilot through Microsoft is amazing too, especially combined with other Microsoft Power Platform tools.

 

We just built a tool through Microsoft that reads every email our companies AR team receives (we are a VERY large company, over 70,000 US Employees), understands the details being provided, standardizes the results, reads any attachments if there are PDFs or Excel files, and then puts the information in Microsoft List, which you can embed the email itself on the record and the search functionality will actually read through all of the emails and not just what is listed on the cells like what you would be limited to with excel.  Completely changes the way my team obtains information and leverages it.

 

Within a year, my team of 50 people may be reduced to 10 if we can continue to leverage functional AI to deliver our services.  It's incredible - and scary

Edited Tuesday at 11:57 AM by Cray51

[Einstein]

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

 

Haha ok soon as I read this I was like yeah, lets do that haha.  Here is the link to the results.  I only asked the top 20 posters and why, didn't ask for the worst...yet...lol.  

 

https://chatgpt.com/share/680727f4-1a90-8012-a159-fd40588192d9

 

15th is higher than I expected to be.

And better than I deserve.

[Draconator]

I use Claude.ai to write emails at work, and I used it for resumes when I was job hunting. I personally like Claude better than ChatGPT for writing, but ChatGPT is amazing for graphics. 

[muppy]

so has anyone asked Swami who the Bills are taking? He always had the  inside info before.

 

Hmmmm

 

I trust Him over a chat CPT 

 

just saying'

 

GO BILLS

 

🙂

[mjt328]

My educated guess is that Brandon Beane is targeting a CB in Round 1.

He will make calls to teams 3-4 picks in front, and 3-4 picks behind us to prepare for trades.

Depending on how our board looks, we could move a few spots.  But I have very little doubt that CB will be the pick.

 

Which makes me sad, because I feel like a good D-Line prospect is going to fall within a reasonable distance of us getting.  But he's pretty much stuck us into a position where a corner must be chosen in the first two rounds.

[Einstein]

28 minutes ago, Draconator said:

I use Claude.ai to write emails at work, and I used it for resumes when I was job hunting. I personally like Claude better than ChatGPT for writing, but ChatGPT is amazing for graphics. 

 

Claude is the undisputed champion of writing. ChatGPT is great at data analysis. And Grok is best at the sciences.

 

 

[eball]

8 hours ago, BigDingus said:

I have paid zero attention to the draft this year & am just waiting to be surprised.

 

I'm already prepping myself for disappointment when we invest more 1st & 2nd round picks into D, which I doubt will amount to anything since it's still McDermott's unit, but I'd love to be wrong & see us grab another WR.

 

Defense is the weakness of this team, by the way…

 

[sunshynman]

10 hours ago, PonyBoy said:

ChatGPT is pretty freaking scary. I'm not one of those people whose engrossed in technology.

 

I used it the other day at work. Took a picture of a control panel with different colors of the status of our scale buckets. It didn't come with directions. Our scales are from China.

We couldn't figure out the codes to program it. 

 

After taking the picture, I simply asked Chat, what does this mean.?

In about 30 seconds it had a thorough breakdown of the chart, meanings, explanations. 

Crazy world we live in! 

 

 

P.S. I just asked GPT if TBD is a good website:

 

Says it's well regarded interactive website. Also:

 

Highlights of Two Bills Drive

Active Forums:

Diverse Content: Beyond game discussions, TBD offers sections like "Off the Wall" for broader NFL topics and general conversations, fostering a well-rounded community experience.

 

Community Engagement: Members often share personal experiences and insights.

 

😀

Pretty smart like I said, couldn't agree more

But there are times where it gives the craziest answers possible. It's a nice tool to use to disseminate information. Still need to verify results.

[boater]

I used ChatGPT to aid in the writing of an admissions essay.

 

I did not use the text GPT provided--it was too verbose and it would have been plagiarism. But I did use the outline as a scaffold for my own writing. It worked out well.

[boyst]

I spoke to Pinto Ron about ChatGPT after a friend brought it up to him. For those that don't know he is a genius with programming, etc.

 

He said this same technology was being used in the 80's and it's just rebranded stuff to seem advanced. It was a remarkable conversation. 

[GunnerBill]

37 minutes ago, boater said:

I used ChatGPT to aid in the writing of an admissions essay.

 

I did not use the text GPT provided--it was too verbose and it would have been plagiarism. But I did use the outline as a scaffold for my own writing. It worked out well.

 

Yea my lodger who is a uni student does that. Asks ChatGPT to write it, then rewrites it but keeps the structure. 

[Dan Darragh]

The problem with comparing artificial intelligence with mock drafts is that most mocks have NO intelligence

[Magox]

I just used X's Grok and asked them the exact same question and they provided:

 

Round 1 pick 30 CB Maxell Hairston

 

Round 2 Pick 56  Edge Donovan Ezeiruaku 

 

Round 2 Pick 62  DT Kenneth Grant