Einstein Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Bills came in at #8 over the past half decade. Lions were #1 and Chiefs were #2. 8. Buffalo Bills (8.46) Top 50 picks: 4 Pro Bowls: 1 Starting seasons: 33 Best pick: edge Gregory Rousseau (No. 30, 2021); Worst pick: CB Kaiir Elam (No. 23, 2022); Best value: WR Khalil Shakir (No. 148, 2022) Like the Chiefs, the Bills have done a terrific job maxing out the draft, despite spending most of the last five years near the bottom of the first round. The Elam miss hurts, but picks such as Shakir, James Cook, O’Cyrus Torrence and Spencer Brown have been huge — and a testament to Buffalo’s scouting department. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6284249/2025/04/20/nfl-draft-power-rankings-lions-chiefs-ravens/ 4 4 Quote
The BLUES Brothers Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Keep it up and then some - They need to nail this one! 4 Quote
SoonerBillsFan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, The BLUES Brothers said: Keep it up and then some - They need to nail this one! This is one where we need 4 rookies to really make an impact 1 Quote
Big Blitz Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 18 minutes ago, SoonerBillsFan said: This is one where we need 4 rookies to really make an impact Last years class and this years will take us to Josh’s age 32-33 season. Everything should be done with extreme urgency. 1 1 Quote
YattaOkasan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) Weird they only went back half a decade cause most draft classes take three years to be evaluated. also no mention of Christina benford lol. Easily the best value. Edited 3 hours ago by YattaOkasan 1 Quote
Doc Brown Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago A very good but not elite grade. Shocking. Benford was a better value than Shakir. 21 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Last years class and this years will take us to Josh’s age 32-33 season. Everything should be done with extreme urgency. Chic-fil-A diet > TB12 diet 1 Quote
Ed_Formerly_of_Roch Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago What was hard to figure out how they came up with the rankings as overall NE was ranked #30 with an overall score of 5.58, 9 top 50 picks, 2 pro bowls, and 29 starting seasons. Basically better stats, but yet overall rank was so much lower. Having said that, I'll be the first to admit NE's draft record the past ten year years or so has been terrible, but hard to see why NE is so much lower when you just look at that numbers the article lists. There were a couple other teams where I also saw similar numbers, Vikes Jaquars, even the Giants Quote
The Cincinnati Kid Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I have hard time with the Elam pick’s impact because of Benford. Benford started against the Rams in the opener that season. He is all-pro caliber. So did Beane miss on Elam, yeah. He still got a stud corner from that draft. I don’t know. I don’t get caught up in the miss because of the home run later in the draft. 1 1 Quote
Cray51 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Roughly where I would have them. if they added 2017-2019 they would be higher, but agreed I’d have them around 7th given their draft position and output Quote
FLFan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said: What was hard to figure out how they came up with the rankings as overall NE was ranked #30 with an overall score of 5.58, 9 top 50 picks, 2 pro bowls, and 29 starting seasons. Basically better stats, but yet overall rank was so much lower. Having said that, I'll be the first to admit NE's draft record the past ten year years or so has been terrible, but hard to see why NE is so much lower when you just look at that numbers the article lists. There were a couple other teams where I also saw similar numbers, Vikes Jaquars, even the Giants There is a pretty easy metric of draft effectiveness in my opinion. Did you win? Quote
transient Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 47 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said: What was hard to figure out how they came up with the rankings as overall NE was ranked #30 with an overall score of 5.58, 9 top 50 picks, 2 pro bowls, and 29 starting seasons. Basically better stats, but yet overall rank was so much lower Without looking in too much depth, what these numbers say to me is that with more than twice as many top 50 picks (9 to the Bills 4, which is a marker of NE sucking and drafting in the top half of the league in all but 1 of the 5 drafts) they managed to get 1 more pro-bowl (a truly pointless award nowadays) but fewer starting seasons (despite being a less talented roster over that timeframe). Seems like worse stats to me. Quote
Einstein Posted 46 minutes ago Author Posted 46 minutes ago 1 hour ago, The Cincinnati Kid said: I have hard time with the Elam pick’s impact because of Benford. Benford started against the Rams in the opener that season. He is all-pro caliber. So did Beane miss on Elam, yeah. He still got a stud corner from that draft. I don’t know. I don’t get caught up in the miss because of the home run later in the draft. Benford is awesome. But he doesn’t excuse missing so badly on a 1st rounder. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.