B-Man Posted yesterday at 01:27 AM Posted yesterday at 01:27 AM 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: 2 minutes ago, Homelander said: Keep bleating. It's a new world. President Trump does not respond to this sh*t. Secretary Hegseth will continue no matter how many unsourced Sunday night stories come out. 1
Homelander Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM Author Posted yesterday at 02:02 AM What's good for the goose
Coffeesforclosers Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM Posted yesterday at 02:03 AM Hegseth is mediocre. He was from the start. He's the definition of replaceable. Can him, replace him with, say, Tom Cotton, and you quit having to wipe his ass every other month. There's got to be another...Major, Lt. Colonel or Colonel with a Combat Infantryman's Badge and Ivy League diploma that's less of a liability that him. 1
Doc Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM Posted yesterday at 02:09 AM 38 minutes ago, B-Man said: Keep bleating. It's a new world. President Trump does not respond to this sh*t. Secretary Hegseth will continue no matter how many unsourced Sunday night stories come out. The only things anyone should care about is that military recruiting is up, standards have been restored and his first mission was a success. Clarifying who is on/added to a chat is procedural stuff that can be addressed and means nothing in the grand scheme of things. I mean, when the bar is "ho hum, so what if 13 service members got killed..." 4
Roundybout Posted yesterday at 02:38 AM Posted yesterday at 02:38 AM 28 minutes ago, Doc said: The only things anyone should care about is that military recruiting is up, standards have been restored and his first mission was a success. Clarifying who is on/added to a chat is procedural stuff that can be addressed and means nothing in the grand scheme of things. I mean, when the bar is "ho hum, so what if 13 service members got killed..." What standards? No black people?
4th&long Posted yesterday at 03:17 AM Posted yesterday at 03:17 AM Suck it Maga idiots. You lose again. Studies will be done on you morons.
Big Blitz Posted yesterday at 03:19 AM Posted yesterday at 03:19 AM 38 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What standards? No black people? No this. The NY Times anonymous Pentagon sources: Oh, also:
Big Blitz Posted yesterday at 03:25 AM Posted yesterday at 03:25 AM That and they need an exit ramp from siding with MS-13 1
daz28 Posted yesterday at 03:54 AM Posted yesterday at 03:54 AM 1 hour ago, Coffeesforclosers said: Hegseth is mediocre. He was from the start. He's the definition of replaceable. Can him, replace him with, say, Tom Cotton, and you quit having to wipe his ass every other month. There's got to be another...Major, Lt. Colonel or Colonel with a Combat Infantryman's Badge and Ivy League diploma that's less of a liability that him. ...or just gloss over this AGAIN, and bring up something Biden did. 1
stevestojan Posted yesterday at 04:33 AM Posted yesterday at 04:33 AM (edited) To my friends on the right, whstaboutism aside (ie, the Biden Afghan withdrawal; which was an unmitigated disaster), you have no problem with this? Him sharing these plans on what amounts to a group text with his ***** wife on it? The mission was a success, yes. But you truly don’t have a problem with this? If your defense is that “Biden did worse,” then let me know how you would have responded to this if Austin has done the same. Honestly, put your Biden hate aside, using him as a bar to compare anything to is weak anyway. He was a failure. Period. So, just because Trump is in the oval, you can’t be ok with this. Right? Edited yesterday at 04:34 AM by stevestojan
Westside Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 4 hours ago, daz28 said: ...or just gloss over this AGAIN, and bring up something Biden did. Just like you did for the past four years? 1 1
4th&long Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, Westside said: Just like you did for the past four years? Come on Maga, defend this. We all need a good laugh this morning. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 hours ago, stevestojan said: To my friends on the right, whstaboutism aside (ie, the Biden Afghan withdrawal; which was an unmitigated disaster), you have no problem with this? Him sharing these plans on what amounts to a group text with his ***** wife on it? The mission was a success, yes. But you truly don’t have a problem with this? If your defense is that “Biden did worse,” then let me know how you would have responded to this if Austin has done the same. Honestly, put your Biden hate aside, using him as a bar to compare anything to is weak anyway. He was a failure. Period. So, just because Trump is in the oval, you can’t be ok with this. Right? The haters in this case jump to conclusions based on initial reporting from anonymous sources, create a backstory based on circular reporting, and typically don’t want to engage in whataboutism because it reveals their own hypocrisy. They don’t want to talk about it. The questions in this case for me: 1. Can anonymous reports from liberal-leaning news sources be trusted? In response to your question, I would say…No, I would prefer to wait for additional details to come out before arriving at any conclusion as to what may/may not have happened. 2. Assuming the report is true, is there a comparable incident(s) from past admins, and in those cases, what was the administrative outcome? 3. If the report is true, what was the cause of the event? What safeguards are put in place to prevent similar occurrences in the future? With respect to being ok with it, I’d say if the reports are true, it’s sloppy. However, this is govt work, and sloppy seems pretty common there. 1 1
Albwan Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 10 hours ago, B-Man said: "People familiar with the matter". 1
Recommended Posts