Einstein Posted Thursday at 08:44 PM Posted Thursday at 08:44 PM 23 minutes ago, FireChans said: And that's the rub. Maybe every GM in the NFL was wrong on Elam. That's why you let the board come to you and don't chase needs, IMO. If you can’t count on your GM to make the right pick, it doesn’t matter if you’re picking 5th or 50th. Wherever you pick, you need to have a guy that can evaluate talent. And the fact that Beane was never a true scout is telling (imo). 1 Quote
FireChans Posted Thursday at 08:56 PM Author Posted Thursday at 08:56 PM 17 minutes ago, Mikie2times said: We are 13-14 when we allow 130 yards+ since 2020 in the regular season. How does this compare to the rest of the league during that span? They probably all have a losing record collectively, imo. QB rushes (which is where Balt and KC made their money against us last playoff run) isn't generally a function of not having a big fat tub of goo at 1t, but the EDGEs poorly containing. 18 minutes ago, Einstein's Dog said: This isn't meant to be some form of gotcha. Beane obviously had the choice of Watkins or Pickens when he chose Elam. People can say Beane's board had Elam higher but I think the need factor was baked into the board then (and I was agreeing with you on not liking that move). Ah i got what you are saying. You are saying that when they build the board, they are already accounting for subjective stuff like off the field/character/medical/need etc etc and that level of subjectivity in the board from the jump puts you further away from true BPA before the draft even starts. Fair take then. 1 Quote
FireChans Posted Thursday at 09:10 PM Author Posted Thursday at 09:10 PM 21 minutes ago, Einstein said: If you can’t count on your GM to make the right pick, it doesn’t matter if you’re picking 5th or 50th. Wherever you pick, you need to have a guy that can evaluate talent. And the fact that Beane was never a true scout is telling (imo). Everyone drafts busts or disappointments though. If Beane and his team couldn't evaluate talent, I don't think we would have as many quality day 2-3 picks. That's why I disagree with @GunnerBill and @HappyDays. I think Beane's problem is that in round 1-2, his eyes go wide and he presses for needs. As the draft develops, he sticks more to his evaluations independent of needs and generally does better (compared to the rest of the league). To me, it makes no sense that Beane can somehow identify the large number of late round contributors he finds, but fails to apply that ability in rounds 1-2 UNLESS there's another factor driving his decision-making. 1 Quote
BigAl2526 Posted yesterday at 01:31 AM Posted yesterday at 01:31 AM 4 hours ago, Solomon Grundy said: Yeah, but teams didn't run rough shot over the Rams You're comparing apples to oranges. First, the Rams during a good part of Aaron Donald's tenure ran a 34 defense. In 2020, for instance, A'Shawn Robinson was the nose tackle at 6'3" and 320 lbs. Aaron Donald lined up outside of him. In 2023 Kobie Turner was the nose tackle for part of the year due in part to an injury to Bobby Brown, who came off IR to start in November. Turner was a bit undersized at 305 lbs, but then Brown came in to play at 328 lbs. The defensive end spot in 2023 was variously manned by Earnest Brown at 270 lbs and Marquise Copeland at 287 lbs. Their outside linebackers were Michael Hoecht at 267 lbs (Gee, where have we heard that name lately?) and Byron Young at 258 lbs. So, yes, Aaron Donald was on the light side for a defensive tackle, but overall there was ample beef on the Rams front 5. I don't mind a light defensive tackle, but if you are light across the line, you are bound to be vulnerable to a power run game. I'm happy to have Oliver or Nolen line up with a good-sized nose tackle next to him on run plays. I wouldn't mind both of them together on obvious passing plays, but I think a steady diet of them together on run downs is asking for trouble. 1 Quote
SydneyBillsFan Posted yesterday at 02:17 AM Posted yesterday at 02:17 AM For me it would be a stud DT and a stud CB both being available at 30 - and then we either pick a player in another position OR we trade down. Quote
BuffaloBillsGospel2014 Posted yesterday at 04:30 AM Posted yesterday at 04:30 AM (edited) I don't really have a doomsday scenario but if we select a S or reach on a CB round 1 (Corners that would be too high at pick 30) Amos, Hairston, Revel, Thomas. Edited yesterday at 04:31 AM by BuffaloBillsGospel2014 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.