Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

An immigration judge deemed him likely MS-13

 

You're not a citizen.  
 

Gone.  Deported.  Done.  You had your chance.  
 

Hope is wife is ok needing a restraining order and all.   
 

 

 


What’s that say about a gang in the top left - one now designated a terrorist organization?

 

 


 

Buh bye innocent man.  

Totally Believeable. Trump and his trash have never lied. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

We didn’t sit down when the Laken Riley Act was referenced at Trumps joint address.  
 

Full blown TDS.  

 


 

 

Yes I do.  
 


 

 


 

 

You're gleefully rubbing your hands that an innocent man with a wife and kid is most likely dead. 

 

You're sick in the head, there's no way around it. 

Posted

From June:

 

 

President Biden is set to announce Tuesday new executive actions that will offer protection against deportation to an estimated half a million undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens.

 

The plan grants "parole in place" to undocumented people who have been in this country for at least 10 years. This measure will also allow eligible immigrants to apply for legal permanent status.

 

Additionally, it would extend a path to legality to noncitizen minors, and stepchildren of American citizens.

 

These executive actions include providing eligible immigrants with work permits.

 

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/18/g-s1-4918/parole-immigration-biden-undocumented-deportation
 

 

 

Biden EOs are fine.  This is fine.  
 

Why can’t a Trump EO undo any or all of this? 
 

 

Make it make sense.  
 

Lawfare.  The Commie Judges.  That’s why.  The last hope of resisting the evil orange man.  

Posted
19 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

 

Gee, maybe it's because the prison he was sent to has a 0% rate of people getting out?

 

 


 

Nope.  Not the prison:

 

 

“Excuse me! He could not be—can you let me finish? He could not be rendered back to El Salvador,” she said, “because he was at risk of being harmed in El Salvador.”

 

Jennings went for the jugular:

 

“By who? By who?! By who? I’m asking you!”

“Who was he at risk of?”

 

Roginsky froze. “Who could he be at risk by? I don’t know…”

 

Then came the kill shot:

 

“A rival gang. A RIVAL gang.”

 

Jennings turned to the camera and grinned like a lion licking its chops after a fresh kill.

 

Argument over. Her narrative? Obliterated—by her own words.

 

 

 


 

The People’s Republic of Maryland did NOTHING to protect this woman 

 

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Nope.  Not the prison:

 

 

“Excuse me! He could not be—can you let me finish? He could not be rendered back to El Salvador,” she said, “because he was at risk of being harmed in El Salvador.”

 

Jennings went for the jugular:

 

“By who? By who?! By who? I’m asking you!”

“Who was he at risk of?”

 

Roginsky froze. “Who could he be at risk by? I don’t know…”

 

Then came the kill shot:

 

“A rival gang. A RIVAL gang.”

 

Jennings turned to the camera and grinned like a lion licking its chops after a fresh kill.

 

Argument over. Her narrative? Obliterated—by her own words.

 

 

 


 

The People’s Republic of Maryland did NOTHING to protect this woman 

 

 

 


 

Yawn. 

Posted

What this actually means is " A constitutional crisis " or a blue print on moving to a new form of government. 

Congress no longer exists in today's world, polarized and frozen in voting. SCOTUS is being ignored, judges being ignored and obviously lied to. Judges soon to be ridiculed, then investigations into personal life. 

You see the winner then is the only branch who cannot be investigated, thanks to the ruling of ...TADA, SCOTUS

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Niagara Bill said:

What this actually means is " A constitutional crisis " or a blue print on moving to a new form of government. 

Congress no longer exists in today's world, polarized and frozen in voting. SCOTUS is being ignored, judges being ignored and obviously lied to. Judges soon to be ridiculed, then investigations into personal life. 

You see the winner then is the only branch who cannot be investigated, thanks to the ruling of ...TADA, SCOTUS


Ah, the Constitution is ignored fairly often, and these things work through the process.  
 

In the inevitable chaos of a failed immigration system that seems tailor made to encourage victimization, assault and trafficking, disagreements on how to fix the problem will arise.  Mistakes will be made.  Legal drama will unfold.  I believe the Admin should follow the direction of the SC and perhaps that’s being negotiated behind the scenes, or the judge holding the admin in contempt will solve the problem. 
 

In the meantime, while posting about the challenges in this country—-looks like Team Canada has immigration T Rex arms again. 
 

https://www.tori.ng/news/298706/canada-rejects-asylum-claims-from-over-13000-niger.html

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canada-deports-more-people-predominantly-those-rejected-refugee-status-2025-02-26/

Posted
7 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

Dems…give us your tired, poor, wife beating, human trafficking ms13 members


You cannot prove this outside a court of law. That’s how the system works.

Posted (edited)

The Dems don't care at all about a non-citizen deported to some foreign prison. But he serves an important purpose. What they care about is using this situation to facilitate the use of the courts to block the ability of the administration to reverse the flow of illegals facilitated under the Biden administration. Clog up the courts with millions of trials and hearings while demanding "due process" to prevent deportations. File millions of individual motions that must be evaluated and ruled on. Everyone knows there just aren't enough resources in the judicial system to process so many individual cases. Grind the system to a halt. That's the game and whatever side of the argument you're on you know it.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
6 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The Dems don't care at all about a non-citizen deported to some foreign prison. But he serves an important purpose. What they care about is using this situation to facilitate the use of the courts to block the ability of the administration to reverse the flow of illegals facilitated under the Biden administration. Clog up the courts with millions of trials and hearings while demanding "due process" to prevent deportations. File millions of individual motions that must be evaluated and ruled on. Everyone knows there just aren't enough resources in the judicial system to process so many individual cases. Grind the system to a halt. That's the game and whatever side of the argument you're on you know it.

You don't care, correct? 

 

Isn't that what is really the issue. Throwing a person in a gulag to you is no big deal 

 

Heck, you even like it 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The Dems don't care at all about a non-citizen deported to some foreign prison. But he serves an important purpose. What they care about is using this situation to facilitate the use of the courts to block the ability of the administration to reverse the flow of illegals facilitated under the Biden administration. Clog up the courts with millions of trials and hearings while demanding "due process" to prevent deportations. File millions of individual motions that must be evaluated and ruled on. Everyone knows there just aren't enough resources in the judicial system to process so many individual cases. Grind the system to a halt. That's the game and whatever side of the argument you're on you know it.


Actually I care about Trump following the Supreme Court and not sending a man to a death camp just for fun and giggles. 
 

Sorry you can’t see that. 

Posted
Just now, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:

You don't care, correct? 

 

Isn't that what is really the issue. Throwing a person in a gulag to you is no big deal 

 

Heck, you even like it 

 

 

Please stop using the pretense you have some higher moral standards than others, including me, to avoid admitting my conclusions about the goal are accurate and correct.

Posted
19 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:


Ah, the Constitution is ignored fairly often, and these things work through the process.  
 

In the inevitable chaos of a failed immigration system that seems tailor made to encourage victimization, assault and trafficking, disagreements on how to fix the problem will arise.  Mistakes will be made.  Legal drama will unfold.  I believe the Admin should follow the direction of the SC and perhaps that’s being negotiated behind the scenes, or the judge holding the admin in contempt will solve the problem. 
 

In the meantime, while posting about the challenges in this country—-looks like Team Canada has immigration T Rex arms again. 
 

https://www.tori.ng/news/298706/canada-rejects-asylum-claims-from-over-13000-niger.html

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canada-deports-more-people-predominantly-those-rejected-refugee-status-2025-02-26/

Yes we do...pressure has formed to stop the nonsense. This comes from the same pressure that forced Trudeau out...thank goodness, but Canada will do it without destroying our form of government.

Immigration, was out of control. America and Canada must ask itself...why is immigration..legal immigration...is coming from Muslim based countries than the areas of the world that Ellis Island was famous for. Are there no Euros wanting to come here.

The illegal stuff, is easy to see why. 

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The Dems don't care at all about a non-citizen deported to some foreign prison. But he serves an important purpose. What they care about is using this situation to facilitate the use of the courts to block the ability of the administration to reverse the flow of illegals facilitated under the Biden administration. Clog up the courts with millions of trials and hearings while demanding "due process" to prevent deportations. File millions of individual motions that must be evaluated and ruled on. Everyone knows there just aren't enough resources in the judicial system to process so many individual cases. Grind the system to a halt. That's the game and whatever side of the argument you're on you know it.

⬆️ 

 

🎯 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Actually I care about Trump following the Supreme Court and not sending a man to a death camp just for fun and giggles. 
 

Sorry you can’t see that. 

I'm not against letting him out of prison but he shouldn't be allowed to comes back to the US.

Posted
7 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Please stop using the pretense you have some higher moral standards than others, including me, to avoid admitting my conclusions about the goal are accurate and correct.

No, you want people like this treated like the Jews were treated in Germany. 

 

Just admit it, you want the guy in the concentration camp. Admit how evil you are 

×
×
  • Create New...