Which past receiver would you pick whose skill set this team needs most.

[Mr. WEO]

3 minutes ago, NoSaint said:

one consideration is picking at 30 you are often compromising on *something* 

 

a guy with a weak 40 but decent production 

 

a guy with the talents but missing matching production

 

tons of potential but maybe an injury history 

 

or a second tier position 

 

 

I guess the question is how often should that compromise be elite playmaker at key position but risks making off field headlines 

 

In the end, Beane doesn't care about that.  It's a business--he knows this far into his regime that he has to deliver at least a SB appearance.  Fans absolutely won't care about off field stuff if there's a Lombardy--no fan base would ever loose a wink of sleep over that.

 

 Beane has shown he has the ability to whiff on a late 1st round pick for any or all of the reasons you listed. He might as well TRY to pick an actual elite player-even one with issues off the field.

 

Reid has no problem focusing these kind of guys when it counts, you know.....

[Doc]

Moulds.  Lofton in his prime, but that's not when the Bills had him.  Same for TO.  I can't speak as to Butler or Dubenion.

[machine gun kelly]

On 4/14/2025 at 1:04 PM, FireChans said:

I really long for the offseason where we don’t debate what has-been would be better on the current era Bills.

 

That said, the answer is and will forever be, Moulds.

I agree with you Chans.  The past is the past.  My vote was also Moulds though as he had the speed, size, and hands to create separation.