NewEra Posted Monday at 07:08 PM Posted Monday at 07:08 PM 14 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: I don’t see Grant or Collins as pure 1 techs. Grant can play both and Collins can as well, in addition Collins can probably play a heavy 5 tech like a Calais Campbell with his length. Some draft people see Collins as a better three tech who can play 1 tech because he’s huge. Neither of those guys are pure 1 techs. I think they are versatile pieces. In my mind, on a team who rotates a ton, you get two versatile monsters in the interior to go along with Oliver, Larry O, maybe Carter. It also makes Jones expendable. Same way I feel about receivers and X, Zs and all that stuff. Get versatile pieces who can ball. Sanders is a pure 3 tech only who kinda just becomes the new Jordan Phillips and I am not down for another slow receiver with Harris. He would be like receiver 5 on the depth chart. Makes no sense at this point imo. That’s where we differ- I think Collins is more like Jordan Phillips than Sanders is. I probably hold Sanders in higher regard than most when it comes to pure 3T disruptive play. I do like the thought of lining up Collins next to Grant in certain situations, but give me the guy who specializes in making plays in the backfield. Collins is a guy I’d be happy with in rd 2 in every case- except this one. 1 Quote
frostbitmic Posted Monday at 07:11 PM Posted Monday at 07:11 PM As the Titans GM in this draft I jokingly offered up pick #35 to the Bills for both of their 2nd round picks ... It wasn't a popular idea ... Revel and Amos were both still on the board at that point. As a fan, I now wish the Bills had made the deal and taken one of the corners. After taking two 1 Tech DTs, that position is set, CB #2 is not. Who will be the pick at #60 ? 1 Quote
quincy Posted Monday at 09:27 PM Posted Monday at 09:27 PM Voted Collins. We then at the very least would not be undersized at DT anymore and presumably would feel more confident in containing the opposing running game. 1TDT would then be well stocked for the next 3 seasons. Quote
FLFan Posted Monday at 09:35 PM Posted Monday at 09:35 PM I just do not see what people like about Harris for the Bills. He is exactly the wrong skill set for what they need. He might be a Mack Hollins replacement in 3 years. 1 Quote
ControllerOfPlanetX Posted yesterday at 01:27 AM Posted yesterday at 01:27 AM On 4/13/2025 at 9:11 PM, H2o said: Bond shouldn't even be on this list after the Sexual Assault charges, and I can't believe 3 people voted for him. they thought it was a poll for who the Chiefs will draft. Quote
Thurman#1 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 14 hours ago, FireChans said: We drafted a safety we needed to contribute right away and that safety could barely play. I’m with @GunnerBill. I don’t care where the team needs are within reason. I’m not taking a 3rd round grade DB in round 2. Might've easily been able to play if he hadn't missed most of TC with an injury. We'll never know. Agreed that you don't take a 3rd round DB in round 2. But I don't think that's under consideration. Could be, though, that you think he's a round 3 guy and they think he's a 2. Quote
GunnerBill Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Thurman#1 said: Might've easily been able to play if he hadn't missed most of TC with an injury. We'll never know. Agreed that you don't take a 3rd round DB in round 2. But I don't think that's under consideration. Could be, though, that you think he's a round 3 guy and they think he's a 2. I'd be genuinely really surprised if any corners beyond the names regularly mentioned here: Hunter, Barron, Johnson, Revel, Amos, Hariston, Morrison, Thomas, Porter actually go in the first two rounds. The one I give a squeak to is Nohl Williams. I know, 32 different teams, 32 different boards, but there genuinely is a very clear drop off to my eye and the draft has so much strength at defensive line I think teams will be reluctant to reach down the board for cornerbacks. Edited 16 hours ago by GunnerBill Quote
Cash Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 18 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: That’s fair and a much more eloquent way of saying what I was trying to get at. 🤣🤣 CB, they need a starter. They have a few other spots, DL & WR where they rotate and have different packages. They need, at least a guy at each of those positions that plays regular snaps. It doesn’t need to be 80% or anything like that but should contribute immediately. Yeah, think contributor more than starter, and I think most of us are on the same page. A WR or d-lineman who plays significant snaps off the bench would fit the mold. 1 Quote
njbuff Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago On 4/13/2025 at 8:20 PM, HappyDays said: I'd add WR Jalen Royals. The Bills have him as a top 30 visit and reportedly really like him. He's projected as a late 2nd/early 3rd. I'd add Elic Ayomanor too although there hasn't any reported interest yet. Outside WR is still a big need. I'd take Bond out. With his criminal and character concerns no chance he is a Bills option this high. I can see the Bills double dipping with Royals and Bond if Bond slips because of his legal troubles. The Bills won’t draft Bond in the top 4 rounds. I’d be shocked. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.