TSW 2.0 Poll - Who should the Bills select at #56

[HappyDays]

3 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

Yea I think in that scenario DQ is gone after June 1st …Oliver/Sanders/ Ojunjobi at 3T, Grant/Carter at the 1 

 

I would lean towards Ogunjobi being gone. Beane basically admitted he wouldn't have signed him if he had known about the suspension ahead of time. If you have Oliver and Sanders as the 3Ts, Grant and DQ as the 1Ts, and then Carter maybe playing both spots, that's probably the best possible balance you could get from that group, plus you get to avoid the headache of having to reintegrate Ogunjobi back onto the roster in week 7.

[H2o]

Bond shouldn't even be on this list after the Sexual Assault charges, and I can't believe 3 people voted for him. 

[Virgil]

At least this poll has some completion in the voting 

[BlueRed]

I think Cameron Williams is BPA on this list if we are being honest … I’d hate for them to reach on a RD 2 pick on a specific position but leaving day 2 without a CB would be tough to take. 

[Maynard]

I’d go Royals

[Brandon]

It's really close,  but I think I'd take advantage of the DT depth, double up at 1T and take Collins.  Royals would be my 2nd choice.    

 

A CB would be my preference here,  but it seems like the value isn't there.  In this type of scenario, I would expect the Bills to trade up for a CB here or trade out of the pick if they can't.    

[BillsFanForever19]

1 hour ago, Doc Brown said:

Isaiah Bond.  We haven't won the Super Bowl drafting choir boys so let's go in a completely different direction.  Great start with signing two guys juicing in free agency.

 

You joke but the sad part is there's people reading that going "hell yeah brother!"

 

1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

 

I would lean towards Ogunjobi being gone. 

 

Considering he signed a 1 yr deal for 6.7m of which 5.4m of that is guaranteed, after they got word of the suspension - that would be pretty surprising.

 

If they wanted out, having him put pen to paper on a practically fully guaranteed contract after they found out instead of simply pulling the deal, when they easily could have (or at least lowered or completely removed the guarantees) - would be a particularly head scratching decision.

Edited yesterday at 02:16 AM by BillsFanForever19

[Doc Brown]

57 minutes ago, H2o said:

Bond shouldn't even be on this list after the Sexual Assault charges, and I can't believe 3 people voted for him. 

 

28 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

 

You joke but the sad part is there's people reading that going "hell yeah brother!"

 

Reminds me of a slightly taller Hollywood Brown.  Could help take the top off a defense.

[Trust The Process]

We need an upgrade at Free Safety. Damar Hamlin is at best a backup . Darrick Forrest has upside and the potential to be our starting Safety next season. My concern is he only started once in the past 4 years in 2022, albeit a damn good one with 79 Total Tackles and 4 INT’s.
 

Having said that, I voted for Andrew Makuba. Despite below average height, weight, arm length, and hands, Makuba is in the 86 percentile in the 40 yard dash, and 78 percentile in the 10 yard split, has a mind boggling 90 PFF grade, and was a ballhawk last season with 5 INT’s. Makuba is also taylor made for our Zone Defense. The bottom line is the kid is a baller. 

[Big Blitz]

I like Bech over these WRs.  
 

But I’m leaning toward doubling up at DT

[KOKBILLS]

Oh my...

 

I am definitely not a Harris at 56 fan... IMHO Royals is clearly the better pro prospect along with the fact that Harris' skill set is way too similar to Keon Coleman's... Harris also comes from that Ole Miss Offense so good luck with that 4.54 speed and those 4 routes he knows... He is the exact opposite of what the Bills need at WR... They already have Coleman and Palmer that can do what he does. I don't get it... 

 

 

[Richard Noggin]

It was down to WR Harris, DT Sanders, DT Collins, and S Mukuba for me. And I voted for the lamest pick of the 4 tbh (Mukuba). Sanders or Harris are probably the correct answers.

[Alphadawg7]

I dont think there is much chance we will actually draft Harris in this spot in the real drat, and I am not really sure why Harris is leading the vote here...he isn't exactly the type of WR we even need.  

[GunnerBill]

39 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I dont think there is much chance we will actually draft Harris in this spot in the real drat, and I am not really sure why Harris is leading the vote here...he isn't exactly the type of WR we even need.  

 

Cos Beane loves drafting slow receivers....

[Doc Brown]

4 hours ago, KOKBILLS said:

Oh my...

 

I am definitely not a Harris at 56 fan... IMHO Royals is clearly the better pro prospect along with the fact that Harris' skill set is way too similar to Keon Coleman's... Harris also comes from that Ole Miss Offense so good luck with that 4.54 speed and those 4 routes he knows... He is the exact opposite of what the Bills need at WR... They already have Coleman and Palmer that can do what he does. I don't get it... 

 

 

To me his scouting report looks like if Gabe Davis and Keon Coleman had a baby.

[GunnerBill]

6 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I do see the double at DT with Sanders theory. He is kinda sticking out on my board. That probably is what they should do. But this regime at throwing resource at D Tackle.... jeepers creepers.

 

Having thought about it overnight I am reluctantly switching my vote to Sanders. He is a full half round clear of the next player on my board once you discount Bond and as much as I hate the amount of resource Beane keeps throwing at DT every freaking year and I hate the fact that is bails him out for his FA disasters with the drug brothers I just think it is a case were a guy is so clearly the best available. 

 

I was asked in v1.0 whether I'd get on them in future years for not going BPA with Nolen (who I love) because of fit next to or behind Oliver in 3 years time if Amos is only okay. I justify that in terms of round 1 is really for premium positions and DT isn't that especially when one of your best players is already at that spot. But the difference between Sanders and Williams by my board is bigger than the difference between Nolen and Amos and Sanders to Harris is more than half a round.... I can't justify that kind of reach especially for a receiver that doesn't bring anything we don't already have.

[Doc Brown]

2 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I dont think there is much chance we will actually draft Harris in this spot in the real drat, and I am not really sure why Harris is leading the vote here...he isn't exactly the type of WR we even need.  

With Samuel, Coleman, Palmer, Shakir, and Shenault (mostly kick return specialist) on the roster we might not see a WR drafted until day 3.  All are different WR's skill wise with the only thing lacking is a true burner that can take a top off the defense.  Unless a true deep threat falls to us.  I'm guessing Hamler, Virgil, Shavers, and a day 3 pick are on the practice squad and we roll with what we have.  

[LyndonvilleBill]

8 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I do see the double at DT with Sanders theory. He is kinda sticking out on my board. That probably is what they should do. But this regime at throwing resource at D Tackle.... jeepers creepers.

GB, do you have Jack Sawyer on your board at all? He seems to be early on some and later on others. 🤔

Edited yesterday at 09:42 AM by LyndonvilleBill

[GunnerBill]

13 minutes ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

GB, do you have Jack Sawyer on your board at all? He seems to be early on some and later on others. 🤔

 

Yep. He is an early to mid third for me. Not got my board infront of me right now but at this point he'd be 13th or 14th BPA roughly.

[KOKBILLS]

6 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

I dont think there is much chance we will actually draft Harris in this spot in the real drat, and I am not really sure why Harris is leading the vote here...he isn't exactly the type of WR we even need.  

 

I will lambaste Beane if he Drafts Harris...