Jump to content

Who should the Bills select at #56  

143 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should the Bills select at #56

    • WR - Tre Harris - Ole Miss
      38
    • DL - Alfred Collins, Texas
      49

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/14/2025 at 11:00 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The Bills are up at pick #56 in the TSW 2.0 Mock draft.  Please check the link below to see the players that have already been selected.

 

As we obtain more votes, the selection process will be reduced incrementally.  

 

The poll will be closed at 7p EST on 4/14/25

 

 

Edited by Virgil
Posted

I'd add WR Jalen Royals. The Bills have him as a top 30 visit and reportedly really like him. He's projected as a late 2nd/early 3rd. I'd add Elic Ayomanor too although there hasn't any reported interest yet. Outside WR is still a big need.

 

I'd take Bond out. With his criminal and character concerns no chance he is a Bills option this high.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted

I am doubling up on DT here with Collins. 6-6, 335 with 35 inch arms is something we don’t really have. So drafting traits here. But he’s massive.  
 

Harris is a good player, but I am not sure he is what this offense needs. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, MrEpsYtown said:

I am doubling up on DT here with Collins. 6-6, 335 with 35 inch arms is something we don’t really have. So drafting traits here. But he’s massive.  
 

Harris is a good player, but I am not sure he is what this offense needs. 

 

I would vote Collins if we hadn't already taken Grant in round 1. This is why I wouldn't draft Grant that early. The value for 1Ts in this class starts in the mid 2nd round. By taking one too early we've really limited our options here.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 5
Posted

Thomas and Jackson are off the board so they should be removed from the poll. Jackson was drafted by the Seahawks and Thomas went somewhere in round 2 already.

6 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I would vote Collins if we hadn't already taken Grant in round 1. This is why I wouldn't draft Grant that early. The value for 1Ts in this class starts in the mid 2nd round. By taking one too early we've really limited our options here.

 

If we take Grant and these are my options in round 2 that are left, I'm doubling up and pairing him with T.J. Sanders as a 3 Tech. Thats just me and I realize he wont win but hes the best value still at a future need

Posted
4 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

If we take Grant and these are my options in round 2 that are left, I'm doubling up and pairing him with T.J. Sanders as a 3 Tech. Thats just me and I realize he wont win but hes the best value still at a future need

 

Of these options I would also take Sanders for the same reason and then best remaining WR at #62. Double dipping at DT would create somewhat of a roster problem though. Every year we keep 4-5 DTs. Adding Grant and Sanders plus Ogunjobi means we would have 6 (once Ogunjobi's suspension ends). Assuming DeWayne Carter is safe as a recent 3rd round pick, Ogunjobi or DQ would likely end up as a surprise cut after training camp.

Posted
Just now, HappyDays said:

 

Of these options I would also take Sanders for the same reason and then best remaining WR at #62. Double dipping at DT would create somewhat of a roster problem though. Every year we keep 4-5 DTs. Adding Grant and Sanders plus Ogunjobi means we would have 6 (once Ogunjobi's suspension ends). Assuming DeWayne Carter is safe as a recent 3rd round pick, Ogunjobi or DQ would likely end up as a surprise cut after training camp.


Yea I think in that scenario DQ is gone after June 1st …Oliver/Sanders/ Ojunjobi at 3T, Grant/Carter at the 1 

Posted

Mehhh this is underwhelming. Collins would have been the pick if we had gotten a CB in RD1 but I don’t like the double up here with Grant on hand. 
 

No CBs available so likely taking a rotational player. Most of these guys likely available at #62 as well. 
 

I could see the Bills liking Burch but too early for me. 

Harris might be the boundary guy of the future, so why not. 

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

Thomas and Jackson are off the board so they should be removed from the poll. Jackson was drafted by the Seahawks and Thomas went somewhere in round 2 already.

 

If we take Grant and these are my options in round 2 that are left, I'm doubling up and pairing him with T.J. Sanders as a 3 Tech. Thats just me and I realize he wont win but hes the best value still at a future need

I really like TJ Sanders.  I don’t know if they would take him, but he and Oliver together inside on passing downs could be fun.

Posted
5 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

Without the off field I'd take Isaiah Bond, no question. 

 

With it... Tre Harris. 

 

I'm all for taking a WR in the 2nd round, but on the board you still have Harris, Royals, and Ayomanor (maybe throw in Kyle Williams too) and we will be picking again in 6 picks. I don't think any of those WRs separate themselves that much from the pack so I'd take a different position here and then take the best WR available at #62.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Isaiah Bond.  We haven't won the Super Bowl drafting choir boys so let's go in a completely different direction.  Great start with signing two guys juicing in free agency.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

I'm all for taking a WR in the 2nd round, but on the board you still have Harris, Royals, and Ayomanor (maybe throw in Kyle Williams too) and we will be picking again in 6 picks. I don't think any of those WRs separate themselves that much from the pack so I'd take a different position here and then take the best WR available at #62.

Kyle Williams should definitely be in play under this scenario…

  • Disagree 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...