TSW 2.0 Poll - What should the Bills do at #30

[Virgil]

The Bills are up at pick #30 in the TSW 2.0 Mock draft.  Please check the link below to see the players that have already been selected.

 

Please also note that DB Trey Amos is not available in this poll, as we was already selected at #30 in our TSW 1.0 mock.  We've played out the scenario, so it's not an option again.

 

I've also included the option for two trade back scenarios, based upon trade offers we've already received.

 

As we obtain more votes, the selection process will be reduced incrementally.  

 

The poll will be closed at 7p EST.  

Edited 6 hours ago by Virgil

[Alphadawg7]

Have to admit...I came in ready to insta-click Grant...but the option to trade back 4 spots to 34 is really appealing given who is still on this board.  I think I still have to go Grant, but I woudln't hate a trade back either.   

 

37 minutes ago, Virgil said:

The Bills are up at pick #30 in the TSW 2.0 Mock draft.  Please check the link below to see the players that have already been selected.

 

Please also note that DB Trey Amos is not available in this poll, as we was already selected at #30 in our TSW 1.0 mock.  We've played out the scenario, so it's not an option again.

 

I've also included the option for two trade back scenarios, based upon trade offers we've already received.

 

As we obtain more votes, the selection process will be reduced incrementally.  

 

The poll will be closed at 7p EST.  

 

Your Jets trade is incorrect...has us trading 109 to get back pick 109

Edited 17 hours ago by Alphadawg7

[GunnerBill]

10 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said:

Shavon Revel?

 

Yea I'd take him. And in his absence I'd trade back.

[gonzo1105]

Bears are pick 34 by the way not the commanders, I get it boss its late lol

[Prospector]

I said Hampton... That dude is a real real talent... If he fell this far, then thank you for a Josh Jacobs this late in the draft and get some picks for cook 

Edited 16 hours ago by Prospector

[HappyDays]

Grant is who I think Beane would take in this spot if he's still on the board. Not my preference but he will see it as filling a need with a player that has athletic upside, which is what he usually looks for with his first pick.

[Doc Brown]

Are we trading back with the Jets from 30 to 42 for no compensation whatsoever due to salary cap reasons?

[BillsFanForever19]

2 hours ago, Virgil said:

The Bills are up at pick #30 in the TSW 2.0 Mock draft.  Please check the link below to see the players that have already been selected.

 

Please also note that DB Trey Amos is not available in this poll, as we was already selected at #30 in our TSW 1.0 mock.  We've played out the scenario, so it's not an option again.

 

I've also included the option for two trade back scenarios, based upon trade offers we've already received.

 

As we obtain more votes, the selection process will be reduced incrementally.  

 

The poll will be closed at 7p EST.  

 

You missed Shavon Revel Jr. He hasn't been taken and he'd be the top CB available right now. It would be him or Grant as the Top 2 options, imo.

[sirebors]

I'm confused. We're trading two better draft pics for 2 worse draft picks? Are we feeling generous? 

 

30 & 73

for

42 & 109?

 

I'm definitely not voting for this one. 

[No_Matter_What]

I think that at least Scourton and Revel should be included.

 

EDIT: Oops my comments about Bears trade were wrong, I didn't realize there was a trade in our mock. 

 

Anyway, I voted for trade down. With Grant, Amos, Revel, Scourton and Hampton still on the board I am willing to go down and get pick 72 for 109 and 177. Then do some magic in the 2nd round.

 

 

Edited 13 hours ago by No_Matter_What

[OldTimer1960]

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Yea I'd take him. And in his absence I'd trade back.

Has any news about his (Revel’s) injury status come out?  I think it’s tough to expect much from him for this upcoming season if he won’t be cleared until September or October.  Clearly has top talent, if speed and explosiveness are still there after recovery, but he won’t have played football for a full year and could miss a lot of camp and it’s a big step up from East Carolina.  I could be convinced it’s a long-term investment worth making, but if they have no fallback plan at CB it seems pretty risky to count on him for 2025 season.

[GunnerBill]

16 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said:

Has any news about his (Revel’s) injury status come out?  I think it’s tough to expect much from him for this upcoming season if he won’t be cleared until September or October.  Clearly has top talent, if speed and explosiveness are still there after recovery, but he won’t have played football for a full year and could miss a lot of camp and it’s a big step up from East Carolina.  I could be convinced it’s a long-term investment worth making, but if they have no fallback plan at CB it seems pretty risky to count on him for 2025 season.

 

The white smoke has been positive but not seen anything definitive. You are not wrong on the risk for 2025 though. Even if they think he can be a full go by week 4 or week 6 we saw what Cole Bishop as a rookie with no camp looked like. It was not good. Do you want to throw Revel in there in a similar situation? 

[Virgil]

3 hours ago, sirebors said:

I'm confused. We're trading two better draft pics for 2 worse draft picks? Are we feeling generous? 

 

30 & 73

for

42 & 109?

 

I'm definitely not voting for this one. 

fixed it

[OldTimer1960]

6 minutes ago, Virgil said:

fixed it

How did the Bills get pick 73?

Just now, OldTimer1960 said:

How did the Bills get pick 73?

Never mind, I understand now.  Too early to think right…

[EmotionallyUnstable]

I also would like Revel but wonder if a trade back to 34 still allows us to get him there, so that’ll be my vote 

[bills6969]

Shavon Revel is taylor made for this defense. He’s a very physical corner, great tackler.  Only concern is injury history coming off acl tear last year.

[Kirby Jackson]

7 hours ago, Alphadawg7 said:

Have to admit...I came in ready to insta-click Grant...but the option to trade back 4 spots to 34 is really appealing given who is still on this board.  I think I still have to go Grant, but I woudln't hate a trade back either.   

 

 

Your Jets trade is incorrect...has us trading 109 to get back pick 109

This was kind of how I felt but voted opposite. I think either scenario is a win. 

[BuffaloBillyG]

If Grant is there at 30 that's the pick for me. At one point in the off-season he looked to be a top 15 pick. Then the padless drills started and draft crushes moved past him. Trust the tape and take the player. 

 

This would be a slam dunk pick IMO

Edited 9 hours ago by BuffaloBillyG

[Solomon Grundy]

If Grant is gone, make trade with Commanders 

[gonzo1105]

Well looks like this one will be a run away .