Bill from NYC Posted Monday at 11:19 PM Posted Monday at 11:19 PM With selection #57 The panthers, in an effort to protect Bryce Young, select Cameron Williams - OT - University of Texas. I have not seen that much of him, but what I have seen is Quinn Ewers having all day to throw most of the time. I am hoping that this huge kid devlops into a solid RT, or at least a quality guard. The Texans and @Big Blitzare on the clock. 1 Quote
Virgil Posted Monday at 11:32 PM Author Posted Monday at 11:32 PM Just a reminder that I’ll be a little late with my pick. Quote
Big Blitz Posted yesterday at 12:26 AM Posted yesterday at 12:26 AM With the 58th pick in the draft, the Houston Texans select Emery Jones, IOL LSU. He’s a tackle that we believe will be moving to Guard in the pros. We like that versatility. 6’5 and 315 lbs, a 3 year starter at LSU. Second team SEC twice. Experience and success against elite competition. Solidify the interior of our Oline is definitely a priority in the draft. Stroud was sacked and under pressure way too much in 2024. Cam Robinson and Trent Brown will start at OT. Jones will push them but we see him sliding into G next to C Jarret Patterson and RG Juice Scruggs. @Virgil and the Ravens are on the clock. 2 Quote
Virgil Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago With the 59th pick in the draft, the Baltimore Ravens select Omarr Norman-Lott, DL, Tennessee. GM - The Ravens need to shore up their defensive Line and the value on Norman-Lott is there. He's a versatile piece in our hybrid defense that we think can contribute immediately. The Lions @K-No are on the clock 3 Quote
K-No Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Detroit selects Josaiah Stewart, Edge, Michigan. Several DL injuries last year and a need for QB pressure. The Commanders with @HappyDays are on the clock. 3 Quote
BigAl2526 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago In the real world I can't see the Bills doubling up on defensive tackle with their first two picks, both of them looking like 1 tech guys. I think Collins could play some 3 tech, but that's not where he projects. Buffalo has a critical need at CB, and could stand a quality outside receiver and some high-quality competition at safety. Quote
HappyDays Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago With the 61st pick the Commanders select Jaylin Noel, WR, Iowa State. Buffalo @Virgil is back on the clock. I won't lie I'd rather have gotten a CB or another EDGE here but I'd be reaching down the board for one so I'll stick to BPA. Our offense is pretty well set but one thing we are missing is a game breaking x-factor. We traded for Deebo Samuel because we could afford to take the risk, but relying on him to re-find his form is more of a hope than a plan. Enter Jaylin Noel. He completes our WR room and makes our offense a potential matchup nightmare. Noel's 4.39 speed shows up on tape. Jayden Daniels is an elite deep thrower and Noel can get vertical in a hurry. He'll begin his career as our primary kick returner and he'll get some manufactured touches on short crossers and slot fades while he refines his route running and works on his hands. 1 Quote
gonzo1105 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago We should take T.J Sanders now. Maybe just draft nothing but DTs 2 Quote
HappyDays Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 3 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said: We should take T.J Sanders now. Maybe just draft nothing but DTs I'd vote Royals here. We've showed interest in him and this is around the area he's expected to go. Quote
gonzo1105 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 15 minutes ago, HappyDays said: I'd vote Royals here. We've showed interest in him and this is around the area he's expected to go. I know I was just being a smartass lol. I have a pretty big clump of WR's including Harris, Royals, and Felton. I would prefer Felton but I get Royals. Harris makes the least sense even though I do think he can play Z in the NFL but he's too similar to Coleman with more burst. Edited 21 hours ago by gonzo1105 1 Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago If the Bills take Maxwell Hairston in the 1st round how long until somebody starts a thread and wants to make him a WR with his speed Quote
Virgil Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago (edited) This was a rough poll to make. Unless we want a RB, there's some slim pick'ems. Edited 20 hours ago by Virgil Quote
HappyDays Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 minute ago, Virgil said: This was a rough poll to make. Unless we want a RB, there's some slim pick'ems. Did someone actually offer a trade back or is that hypothetical? With this set of players I would trade back if the offer is decent and it isn't too far. Quote
Virgil Posted 20 hours ago Author Posted 20 hours ago Just now, HappyDays said: Did someone actually offer a trade back or is that hypothetical? With this set of players I would trade back if the offer is decent and it isn't too far. Just an idea. With this being the last few picks, I don't know that I need an actual trade. It's just to show what we would want them to do. 1 Quote
Thurman#1 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago That last option shouldn't be "No trades," it should be "None of these trade-ups". Wouldn't mind trading up a bit but not giving away major pieces of draft capital. Quote
Virgil Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago Bills are taking trade offers for their current pick. Feel free to post them here in the thread. If the trade back option wins the poll, then whatever trade option with the most likes will be the one the Bills take. 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Virgil said: Bills are taking trade offers for their current pick. Feel free to post them here in the thread. If the trade back option wins the poll, then whatever trade option with the most likes will be the one the Bills take. San Francisco will do 62, 109, 177 for 75, 100, 113, and 249. Thats 284+76+20=380 from Buffalo for 215+100+68+1=384 from SF. @Virgil Edited 10 hours ago by MrEpsYtown Quote
OldTimer1960 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 20 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: San Francisco will do 62, 109, 177 for 75, 100, 113, and 249. Thats 284+76+20=380 from Buffalo for 215+100+68+1=384 from SF. I don’t mind that - would perhaps put them in range for a CB like Alexander and gain an earlier 4th. So, Bills would move back 13 from 62, move back 4 from 109 and get pick 100? Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 34 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said: I don’t mind that - would perhaps put them in range for a CB like Alexander and gain an earlier 4th. So, Bills would move back 13 from 62, move back 4 from 109 and get pick 100? yes Bills gain 100 and 249 in this scenario. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.