GunnerBill Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 58 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: San Francisco will do 62, 109, 177 for 75, 100, 113, and 249. Thats 284+76+20=380 from Buffalo for 215+100+68+1=384 from SF. @Virgil I'd do it. If this was the board I'd do it. The best two players on the board by far (if we are discounting Bond for off-field reasons) are a DT - we have already picked two and an OT - we have two established starters on the team and other needs. Sliding back 15 gets you into the spot where I do think a Nohl Williams or a Zy Alexander make sense or you could go for one of the speedier receivers - Royals, Felton, etc.... If you are picking here and you are discounting DT and OT it is Tre Harris or Jack Sawyer for me and while both those guys are at positions of need they are not the ideal profiles the Bills need at those spots. 2 Quote
FireChans Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 36 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: I'd do it. If this was the board I'd do it. The best two players on the board by far (if we are discounting Bond for off-field reasons) are a DT - we have already picked two and an OT - we have two established starters on the team and other needs. Sliding back 15 gets you into the spot where I do think a Nohl Williams or a Zy Alexander make sense or you could go for one of the speedier receivers - Royals, Felton, etc.... If you are picking here and you are discounting DT and OT it is Tre Harris or Jack Sawyer for me and while both those guys are at positions of need they are not the ideal profiles the Bills need at those spots. Sawyer would be the best pass rusher on the 2026 Bills. Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 10 minutes ago, FireChans said: Sawyer would be the best pass rusher on the 2026 Bills. I like Sawyer, they won’t draft him. 31 inch arms is just something I don’t think this regime would do with an end. They don’t even like corners with 31 inch arms. Never gonna happen with an edge guy. Quote
OldTimer1960 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 9 minutes ago, FireChans said: Sawyer would be the best pass rusher on the 2026 Bills. I don’t agree. I know some see him as having rush upside, I see him (maybe I am wrong) as a try-hard power rusher with arms that are quite short. I’d compare him some to Chris Kelsay - a player who I thought was unfairly maligned here. He was good, just not great. Quote
FireChans Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 10 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: I like Sawyer, they won’t draft him. 31 inch arms is just something I don’t think this regime would do with an end. They don’t even like corners with 31 inch arms. Never gonna happen with an edge guy. 9 minutes ago, OldTimer1960 said: I don’t agree. I know some see him as having rush upside, I see him (maybe I am wrong) as a try-hard power rusher with arms that are quite short. I’d compare him some to Chris Kelsay - a player who I thought was unfairly maligned here. He was good, just not great. Don’t disagree that they won’t touch him due to the physical attributes. By the same token, if he had 34 inch arms, he probably wouldn’t be around past the top 15. Melvin Ingram had short arms. He was more OLB in a 3-4 though. I’d bet on Sawyer but I could sorta see him being an AJE clean up sack guy too. 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 44 minutes ago, FireChans said: Sawyer would be the best pass rusher on the 2026 Bills. Meh. I don't think he is going to be a difference maker in the NFL. He will be another 6-8 sack guy. Quote
FireChans Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: Meh. I don't think he is going to be a difference maker in the NFL. He will be another 6-8 sack guy. Exactly, the best pass rusher on the Bills lol. 1 Quote
GunnerBill Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 minutes ago, FireChans said: Exactly, the best pass rusher on the Bills lol. Or right in the mix with AJ and Groot. Hence meh. Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago @GunnerBill where do u have the UCLA edge guys whose name I can’t spell? Quote
GunnerBill Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 12 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: @GunnerBill where do u have the UCLA edge guys whose name I can’t spell? Oladejo? Late 3rd I think. Not in front of my board rn but definitely within top 100, think he is 80 something. 1 Quote
nosejob Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 2 hours ago, OldTimer1960 said: I don’t agree. I know some see him as having rush upside, I see him (maybe I am wrong) as a try-hard power rusher with arms that are quite short. I’d compare him some to Chris Kelsay - a player who I thought was unfairly maligned here. He was good, just not great. Once I hear the words lunch pail, I'm out. 1 Quote
Virgil Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago The Buffalo Bills traded the #62 pick to the San Francisco 49ers. San Francisco Trades: 75, 100, 113, and 249 for 384 Points The Bills trade: 62, 109, and 177 for 380 Points @MrEpsYtown is on the clock 1 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago With the 62 pick in the TBD mock draft 2.0 the San Francisco 49ers select TJ Sanders, DT, South Carolina. I debated Sanders earlier in round two but took the corner as I was afraid that position would dry up. This trade up gave me the opportunity to come up and get the target I had earlier. Sanders is not my personal favorite prospect but I think he is a really good fit for San Fran and what they want to do and they have shown a ton of interest in him pre-draft. Honestly with all the needs on the roster the trade up is risky, but I was able to get the OL in Banks, CB in Amos and DL with Sanders. The Kansas City Swifties and @NewEra are on the clock. 3 Quote
LEBills Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago So we took two 1-techs and moved our late second for an early third and to make our early 4th a late third and our late fifth a fourth?…. Hopefully next version goes better Quote
NewEra Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 5 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said: With the 62 pick in the TBD mock draft 2.0 the San Francisco 49ers select TJ Sanders, DT, South Carolina. I debated Sanders earlier in round two but took the corner as I was afraid that position would dry up. This trade up gave me the opportunity to come up and get the target I had earlier. Sanders is not my personal favorite prospect but I think he is a really good fit for San Fran and what they want to do and they have shown a ton of interest in him pre-draft. Honestly with all the needs on the roster the trade up is risky, but I was able to get the OL in Banks, CB in Amos and DL with Sanders. The Kansas City Swifties and @NewEra are on the clock. Good one- sanders was going to be the Thief’s pick. hold 1 Quote
Virgil Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, LEBills said: So we took two 1-techs and moved our late second for an early third and to make our early 4th a late third and our late fifth a fourth?…. Hopefully next version goes better Next version is going to include a trade up. Just a heads up 2 Quote
NewEra Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago The Thiefs double down on OL and select Tate Rutledge- OG- UGA. Josh Simmons and Tate Rutledge make up the new left side of the KC OL. @Mike in Horseheads is on the clock 1 Quote
Mike in Horseheads Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago With the 64nd pick and final pick of Mock Draft 2, The Beagles select Kyren Lacey WR LSU (RIP) Mental health is important, if you or you know anyone are ever feeling that they’d take their own life contact someone ASAP. Call the 988 Life line! (And yes I know about the allegations against him) Mock Draft 3 is on the clock with the 1st pick. (Virgil thanks for letting me participate, I learned a lot) 4 1 Quote
MrEpsYtown Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 14 minutes ago, LEBills said: So we took two 1-techs and moved our late second for an early third and to make our early 4th a late third and our late fifth a fourth?…. Hopefully next version goes better We took two versatile, massive defensive tackles. And I think the trade down made a ton of sense with what was on the board, something Beane did in 2022 when he didn’t like the board and just kept moving down. Also gained an extra pick in the trade. To me if you go DT in round 1 you will be in no man’s land in round 2, which is what happened here. I think it is a really good exercise to see the possibilities. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.