Roundybout Posted Monday at 04:32 PM Posted Monday at 04:32 PM 5 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Boom. End of story. This doesn’t make any sense since we have a contract with El Salvador to send enemies of the state/minorities there. It then follows we can get him back. They’re stalling for some reason. My guess is he’s been killed already. 1
Homelander Posted Monday at 04:32 PM Posted Monday at 04:32 PM 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Boom. End of story. Simpletons. Loud and wrong is still wrong. If it’s a “partnership,” then you own what happens. Handing people off to rot and pretending you're innocent is pure cowardice.
Roundybout Posted Monday at 04:32 PM Posted Monday at 04:32 PM Just now, BillsFanNC said: All these people need to be tried at The Hague, good lord. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Monday at 04:37 PM Posted Monday at 04:37 PM 4 minutes ago, Homelander said: Simpletons. Loud and wrong is still wrong. If it’s a “partnership,” then you own what happens. Handing people off to rot and pretending you're innocent is pure cowardice. So were the border policies of the previous administration. 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS and bring him back. Seems like a waste of tax payers money.
Roundybout Posted Monday at 04:40 PM Posted Monday at 04:40 PM 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: So were the border policies of the previous administration. Seems like a waste of tax payers money. Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS.
BillsFanNC Posted Monday at 04:49 PM Author Posted Monday at 04:49 PM Lol. Those in favor of allowing illegal alien criminal terrorists into the country to rape and murder US citizens lose. Again. But yes, more please. 90/10 issues are winning! 😂
Roundybout Posted Monday at 04:52 PM Posted Monday at 04:52 PM 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Lol. Those in favor of allowing illegal alien criminal terrorists into the country to rape and murder US citizens lose. Again. But yes, more please. 90/10 issues are winning! 😂 Why are you not acknowledging the SCOTUS ruling?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Monday at 04:54 PM Posted Monday at 04:54 PM 12 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS. I care, pretty sure I'm not the only one. You sure love spending tax dollars.
Taro T Posted Monday at 05:17 PM Posted Monday at 05:17 PM 35 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS. Did you actually read the decision? It's only 4 pages long, so it shouldn't take you more than 4 or 5 hours to do so. If you did read it; did you understand it? Because the ruling doesn't say what you claim it says. 1 1
Roundybout Posted Monday at 05:43 PM Posted Monday at 05:43 PM 49 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I care, pretty sure I'm not the only one. You sure love spending tax dollars. Shouldn’t have wasted my tax dollars shipping him down there. 26 minutes ago, Taro T said: Did you actually read the decision? It's only 4 pages long, so it shouldn't take you more than 4 or 5 hours to do so. If you did read it; did you understand it? Because the ruling doesn't say what you claim it says. It said “facilitate” a return to the U.S. Youre not twisting your way out of this.
B-Man Posted Monday at 05:51 PM Posted Monday at 05:51 PM It is over. "The question is preposterous. How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? I don’t have the power to return him to the United States." "I mean, we’re not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. We just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere and you want us to go back into releasing criminals so we can go back to being the murder capital of the world? That’s not going to happen." "El Salvador President Nayib Bukele says he won’t return Abrego Garcia to U.S." (CNBC). https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/14/abrego-garcia-el-salvador-trump-nayib-bukele.html 3
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Monday at 06:14 PM Posted Monday at 06:14 PM 29 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Shouldn’t have wasted my tax dollars shipping him down there. It said “facilitate” a return to the U.S. Youre not twisting your way out of this. Oh yeah, which page? 1
Roundybout Posted Monday at 06:37 PM Posted Monday at 06:37 PM 22 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Oh yeah, which page? Do you read the news? https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-upholds-order-facilitate-return-deportee-sent-el-salvador-error-2025-04-10/ By the way, he’s clearly saying he’s going to ship American citizens to the gulag pretty soon.
Taro T Posted Monday at 07:19 PM Posted Monday at 07:19 PM 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Shouldn’t have wasted my tax dollars shipping him down there. It said “facilitate” a return to the U.S. Youre not twisting your way out of this. Did you see the other fancy word in that original sentence? The court judge needs to define what was meant by that other fancy word and the SCOTUS said that judge may have overstepped the court's authority on that count. The SCOTUS ruling also states clearly that "the order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." It remains to be seen what the District Court Judge meant by the other fancy word to determine whether he needs to be sent back to the US. Considering he's an El Salvadoran citizen now in El Salvador, it is not entirely clear that the US can make the action suggested by that other fancy word actually happen. And, btw, have taken no position on this issue other than to state that what the SCOTUS said is not what you believe it said. There will likely be a further time set for arguments before the SCOTUS after the District Court Judge follows the SCOTUS instructions.
BillsFanNC Posted Monday at 07:33 PM Author Posted Monday at 07:33 PM Why is Roundy for the kidnapping foreign nationals and bringing them to the USA?
Roundybout Posted Monday at 07:36 PM Posted Monday at 07:36 PM 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Why is Roundy for the kidnapping foreign nationals and bringing them to the USA? No kidnapping. The U.S. can simply bring him back. Why do you believe everything this administration says? Why can’t you think for yourself? 17 minutes ago, Taro T said: Did you see the other fancy word in that original sentence? The court judge needs to define what was meant by that other fancy word and the SCOTUS said that judge may have overstepped the court's authority on that count. The SCOTUS ruling also states clearly that "the order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." It remains to be seen what the District Court Judge meant by the other fancy word to determine whether he needs to be sent back to the US. Considering he's an El Salvadoran citizen now in El Salvador, it is not entirely clear that the US can make the action suggested by that other fancy word actually happen. And, btw, have taken no position on this issue other than to state that what the SCOTUS said is not what you believe it said. There will likely be a further time set for arguments before the SCOTUS after the District Court Judge follows the SCOTUS instructions. That’s a lot of gibberish for “SCOTUS said bring him back.” 1 1
B-Man Posted Monday at 08:13 PM Posted Monday at 08:13 PM (edited) 37 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why do you believe everything this administration says? Why can’t you think for yourself? Oh the irony. . . . . . . . Say "gulag" a few more times Roundabout, maybe you will convince some one. LOL. Meanwhile: The Democrat and media narrative surrounding an illegal alien that's been deported to El Salvador is basically "the Trump administration made a mistake and removed somebody who isn't a gang member," all while the Left has been demanding his return to the U.S. Today Trump adviser Stephen Miller took on some reporters outside the White House and the Dem narrative pushers in the press lost in a fast TKO. This is a master class on how to handle an activist media The lib media continues to peddle Dem talking points such as "he was in the country illegally but hadn't committed any crimes" which is as self-refuting as it gets. https://twitchy.com/dougp/2025/04/14/stephen-miller-shreds-demmedia-narrative-surrounding-deported-ms-13-gang-member-n2411368 Edited Monday at 08:14 PM by B-Man 1
Roundybout Posted Monday at 08:20 PM Posted Monday at 08:20 PM 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: Oh the irony. . . . . . . . Say "gulag" a few more times Roundabout, maybe you will convince some one. LOL. Meanwhile: The Democrat and media narrative surrounding an illegal alien that's been deported to El Salvador is basically "the Trump administration made a mistake and removed somebody who isn't a gang member," all while the Left has been demanding his return to the U.S. Today Trump adviser Stephen Miller took on some reporters outside the White House and the Dem narrative pushers in the press lost in a fast TKO. This is a master class on how to handle an activist media The lib media continues to peddle Dem talking points such as "he was in the country illegally but hadn't committed any crimes" which is as self-refuting as it gets. https://twitchy.com/dougp/2025/04/14/stephen-miller-shreds-demmedia-narrative-surrounding-deported-ms-13-gang-member-n2411368 Yes he was and Trump is ignoring a SCOTUS order to bring him back. authoritarianism is knocking on the door and you’re happy to let it in, all because you and the rest of the MAGA boomers don’t want brown folks around. Very sad. 1
JDHillFan Posted Monday at 09:35 PM Posted Monday at 09:35 PM 5 hours ago, Roundybout said: we have a contract with El Salvador to send enemies of the state/minorities I want to be learned. Can you show me the part about minorities? Sounds made up. 1
Recommended Posts