Roundybout Posted April 1 Posted April 1 10 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: No no. Didn’t “ignore” anything. Soccer Dad was on another list. Not the first round but next up. I have the court docs, you have LibsofTikTok.
Orlando Buffalo Posted April 1 Posted April 1 I can't believe that this is not reductio ad absurdum but actually what Dems are right now arguing. A man who commits multiple murders in another country as a gang member and then illegally comes to the US to commit more crime gets the right to an American trial even if we don't have jurisdiction where they committed the multiple murders. @Roundybout, @4th&long@Homelander, what about that scenario do I have wrong? 1
boyst Posted April 1 Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Now you’re moving the goalposts. You lost. You also seem to want all power in the United States to be concentrated in the executive office. That’s called a king. You anti-American fool. No I don't. I want the states to have ultimate power and the feds to be an arbitrary factor to settle a few things. The fed handles foreign trade, interstate commerce, and national defense. But this is not what I want. You want a court order to mandate the guy is legally in this country, yes? That decision by the court to veto any executive action?
Roundybout Posted April 1 Posted April 1 24 minutes ago, boyst said: No I don't. I want the states to have ultimate power and the feds to be an arbitrary factor to settle a few things. The fed handles foreign trade, interstate commerce, and national defense. But this is not what I want. You want a court order to mandate the guy is legally in this country, yes? That decision by the court to veto any executive action? I want the executive office bound by the laws of the nation, yes. Why is this a bad thing?
BillsFanNC Posted April 1 Author Posted April 1 Roundy: There aren't any illegal immigrant gangs taking over apartments in Colorado!! Trump's people shared CLASSIFIED information on Signal!!!!! Kamala isn't the border czar and the border is secure!!! Transwomen are women. Cope and seethe!!!! Roundy's latest: The illegal alien deported to El Salvador isn't MS-13!!!! 1
ScotSHO Posted April 1 Posted April 1 He's also a legal expert now! The Great One continues to amaze! 1
Big Blitz Posted April 1 Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Homelander said: You accepted Laken Riley as collateral damage to be an open borders country. 1 1
4th&long Posted April 1 Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Orlando Buffalo said: I can't believe that this is not reductio ad absurdum but actually what Dems are right now arguing. A man who commits multiple murders in another country as a gang member and then illegally comes to the US to commit more crime gets the right to an American trial even if we don't have jurisdiction where they committed the multiple murders. @Roundybout, @4th&long@Homelander, what about that scenario do I have wrong? Everything. 1
Homelander Posted April 1 Posted April 1 7 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: You accepted Laken Riley as collateral damage to be an open borders country. Why stop there? Why didn't Trump 1.0 take action to prevent the tragedies on his watch? For the first two years, Trump had control of all three branches of government, yet the only major legislation he prioritized was a tax cut that primarily benefited the top 1%. Where was the outrage during his time in office for him not prioritizing our border? 1
JFKjr Posted April 1 Posted April 1 Lets call all the thugs, gang members and domestic terrorists FATHERS so it seems like they're great dudes raising families.
Roundybout Posted April 1 Posted April 1 1 hour ago, ScotSHO said: He's also a legal expert now! The Great One continues to amaze! Doesn’t take a legal expert to know how to read court documents. It just takes a high school reading level, which is difficult for MAGAs. 1
boyst Posted April 1 Posted April 1 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: I want the executive office bound by the laws of the nation, yes. Why is this a bad thing? Which laws are not being bound to with respect to deporting an illegal immigrant?
Homelander Posted April 1 Posted April 1 8 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Lets call all the thugs, gang members and domestic terrorists FATHERS so it seems like they're great dudes raising families. Or, Elon Musk?
Roundybout Posted April 1 Posted April 1 6 minutes ago, boyst said: Which laws are not being bound to with respect to deporting an illegal immigrant? The one about him getting an order of protection to stay with his wife and kid.
nedboy7 Posted April 1 Posted April 1 Why would ICE make a statement that it was an administrative error? Is ICE a bunch of transgender liberals who secretly hate trump? 21 minutes ago, boyst said: Which laws are not being bound to with respect to deporting an illegal immigrant? Even undocumented immigrants have certain rights under the U.S. Constitution, including the right to due process, protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, and access to emergency medical care. I got no problem with getting rid of gang members. I support it. But you can't bend the law cause you like the outcome. https://www.accessiblelaw.untdallas.edu/post/undocumented-immigrants-rights-under-the-united-states-constitution
boyst Posted April 1 Posted April 1 16 minutes ago, Roundybout said: The one about him getting an order of protection to stay with his wife and kid. Does a judge have the ability to change the laws of the United States? 3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said: Why would ICE make a statement that it was an administrative error? Is ICE a bunch of transgender liberals who secretly hate trump? Even undocumented immigrants have certain rights under the U.S. Constitution, including the right to due process, protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, and access to emergency medical care. I got no problem with getting rid of gang members. I support it. But you can't bend the law cause you like the outcome. https://www.accessiblelaw.untdallas.edu/post/undocumented-immigrants-rights-under-the-united-states-constitution Hold on, sweetie. I'm dealing with one simpleton at a time. 1
Big Blitz Posted April 1 Posted April 1 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: I have the court docs, you have LibsofTikTok. You lose
nedboy7 Posted April 1 Posted April 1 Just now, boyst said: Does a judge have the ability to change the laws of the United States? Hold on, sweetie. I'm dealing with one simpleton at a time. That seems to be your max brain capacity.
Recommended Posts