Homelander Posted April 14 Posted April 14 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Boom. End of story. Simpletons. Loud and wrong is still wrong. If it’s a “partnership,” then you own what happens. Handing people off to rot and pretending you're innocent is pure cowardice.
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 Just now, BillsFanNC said: All these people need to be tried at The Hague, good lord. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted April 14 Posted April 14 4 minutes ago, Homelander said: Simpletons. Loud and wrong is still wrong. If it’s a “partnership,” then you own what happens. Handing people off to rot and pretending you're innocent is pure cowardice. So were the border policies of the previous administration. 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS and bring him back. Seems like a waste of tax payers money.
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: So were the border policies of the previous administration. Seems like a waste of tax payers money. Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS.
BillsFanNC Posted April 14 Author Posted April 14 Lol. Those in favor of allowing illegal alien criminal terrorists into the country to rape and murder US citizens lose. Again. But yes, more please. 90/10 issues are winning! 😂
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Lol. Those in favor of allowing illegal alien criminal terrorists into the country to rape and murder US citizens lose. Again. But yes, more please. 90/10 issues are winning! 😂 Why are you not acknowledging the SCOTUS ruling?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted April 14 Posted April 14 12 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS. I care, pretty sure I'm not the only one. You sure love spending tax dollars.
Taro T Posted April 14 Posted April 14 35 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Don’t care. Follow SCOTUS. Did you actually read the decision? It's only 4 pages long, so it shouldn't take you more than 4 or 5 hours to do so. If you did read it; did you understand it? Because the ruling doesn't say what you claim it says. 1 1
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 49 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: I care, pretty sure I'm not the only one. You sure love spending tax dollars. Shouldn’t have wasted my tax dollars shipping him down there. 26 minutes ago, Taro T said: Did you actually read the decision? It's only 4 pages long, so it shouldn't take you more than 4 or 5 hours to do so. If you did read it; did you understand it? Because the ruling doesn't say what you claim it says. It said “facilitate” a return to the U.S. Youre not twisting your way out of this.
B-Man Posted April 14 Posted April 14 It is over. "The question is preposterous. How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? I don’t have the power to return him to the United States." "I mean, we’re not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. We just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere and you want us to go back into releasing criminals so we can go back to being the murder capital of the world? That’s not going to happen." "El Salvador President Nayib Bukele says he won’t return Abrego Garcia to U.S." (CNBC). https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/14/abrego-garcia-el-salvador-trump-nayib-bukele.html 3
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted April 14 Posted April 14 29 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Shouldn’t have wasted my tax dollars shipping him down there. It said “facilitate” a return to the U.S. Youre not twisting your way out of this. Oh yeah, which page? 1
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 22 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Oh yeah, which page? Do you read the news? https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-upholds-order-facilitate-return-deportee-sent-el-salvador-error-2025-04-10/ By the way, he’s clearly saying he’s going to ship American citizens to the gulag pretty soon.
Taro T Posted April 14 Posted April 14 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Shouldn’t have wasted my tax dollars shipping him down there. It said “facilitate” a return to the U.S. Youre not twisting your way out of this. Did you see the other fancy word in that original sentence? The court judge needs to define what was meant by that other fancy word and the SCOTUS said that judge may have overstepped the court's authority on that count. The SCOTUS ruling also states clearly that "the order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." It remains to be seen what the District Court Judge meant by the other fancy word to determine whether he needs to be sent back to the US. Considering he's an El Salvadoran citizen now in El Salvador, it is not entirely clear that the US can make the action suggested by that other fancy word actually happen. And, btw, have taken no position on this issue other than to state that what the SCOTUS said is not what you believe it said. There will likely be a further time set for arguments before the SCOTUS after the District Court Judge follows the SCOTUS instructions.
BillsFanNC Posted April 14 Author Posted April 14 Why is Roundy for the kidnapping foreign nationals and bringing them to the USA?
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Why is Roundy for the kidnapping foreign nationals and bringing them to the USA? No kidnapping. The U.S. can simply bring him back. Why do you believe everything this administration says? Why can’t you think for yourself? 17 minutes ago, Taro T said: Did you see the other fancy word in that original sentence? The court judge needs to define what was meant by that other fancy word and the SCOTUS said that judge may have overstepped the court's authority on that count. The SCOTUS ruling also states clearly that "the order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador." It remains to be seen what the District Court Judge meant by the other fancy word to determine whether he needs to be sent back to the US. Considering he's an El Salvadoran citizen now in El Salvador, it is not entirely clear that the US can make the action suggested by that other fancy word actually happen. And, btw, have taken no position on this issue other than to state that what the SCOTUS said is not what you believe it said. There will likely be a further time set for arguments before the SCOTUS after the District Court Judge follows the SCOTUS instructions. That’s a lot of gibberish for “SCOTUS said bring him back.” 1 1
B-Man Posted April 14 Posted April 14 (edited) 37 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why do you believe everything this administration says? Why can’t you think for yourself? Oh the irony. . . . . . . . Say "gulag" a few more times Roundabout, maybe you will convince some one. LOL. Meanwhile: The Democrat and media narrative surrounding an illegal alien that's been deported to El Salvador is basically "the Trump administration made a mistake and removed somebody who isn't a gang member," all while the Left has been demanding his return to the U.S. Today Trump adviser Stephen Miller took on some reporters outside the White House and the Dem narrative pushers in the press lost in a fast TKO. This is a master class on how to handle an activist media The lib media continues to peddle Dem talking points such as "he was in the country illegally but hadn't committed any crimes" which is as self-refuting as it gets. https://twitchy.com/dougp/2025/04/14/stephen-miller-shreds-demmedia-narrative-surrounding-deported-ms-13-gang-member-n2411368 Edited April 14 by B-Man 1
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: Oh the irony. . . . . . . . Say "gulag" a few more times Roundabout, maybe you will convince some one. LOL. Meanwhile: The Democrat and media narrative surrounding an illegal alien that's been deported to El Salvador is basically "the Trump administration made a mistake and removed somebody who isn't a gang member," all while the Left has been demanding his return to the U.S. Today Trump adviser Stephen Miller took on some reporters outside the White House and the Dem narrative pushers in the press lost in a fast TKO. This is a master class on how to handle an activist media The lib media continues to peddle Dem talking points such as "he was in the country illegally but hadn't committed any crimes" which is as self-refuting as it gets. https://twitchy.com/dougp/2025/04/14/stephen-miller-shreds-demmedia-narrative-surrounding-deported-ms-13-gang-member-n2411368 Yes he was and Trump is ignoring a SCOTUS order to bring him back. authoritarianism is knocking on the door and you’re happy to let it in, all because you and the rest of the MAGA boomers don’t want brown folks around. Very sad. 1
JDHillFan Posted April 14 Posted April 14 5 hours ago, Roundybout said: we have a contract with El Salvador to send enemies of the state/minorities I want to be learned. Can you show me the part about minorities? Sounds made up. 1
B-Man Posted April 14 Posted April 14 President Trump, Marco Rubio, Stephen Miller and other members of this administration have spent a good portion of the day dunking on an activist media that's been pushing the Democrats' preferred narrative about the illegal alien who was deported to El Salvador. The media can't grasp it because they don't want to. Another example of that came courtesy of Politico: Actually, Politico, he's an "El Salvador man" but don't stop trying to push that narrative! .https://twitchy.com/dougp/2025/04/14/politicos-getting-ratioed-over-spin-on-wrongly-deported-maryland-man-n2411380 1
Roundybout Posted April 14 Posted April 14 35 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: I want to be learned. Can you show me the part about minorities? Sounds made up. I don’t see any pasty white aryan types being sent to the torture chambers. If I am wrong, please provide me a source. 23 minutes ago, B-Man said: President Trump, Marco Rubio, Stephen Miller and other members of this administration have spent a good portion of the day dunking on an activist media that's been pushing the Democrats' preferred narrative about the illegal alien who was deported to El Salvador. The media can't grasp it because they don't want to. Another example of that came courtesy of Politico: Actually, Politico, he's an "El Salvador man" but don't stop trying to push that narrative! .https://twitchy.com/dougp/2025/04/14/politicos-getting-ratioed-over-spin-on-wrongly-deported-maryland-man-n2411380 Still haven’t addressed the 9-0 SCOTUS ruling. Been all day. 1
Recommended Posts