SoCal Deek Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM Posted Wednesday at 09:42 PM (edited) I’ve said repeatedly that I’m no draft expert but just like every other Mock that I look at, I immediately go to the guys the Bills did NOT take who were available just a few picks later. In this case the Bills draft class would instead be: Nolen DT Ole Miss Porter, DB Iowa State Winslow, S Penn State Anybody? Edited Wednesday at 09:43 PM by SoCal Deek Quote
GunnerBill Posted Wednesday at 10:54 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:54 PM 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: I’ve said repeatedly that I’m no draft expert but just like every other Mock that I look at, I immediately go to the guys the Bills did NOT take who were available just a few picks later. In this case the Bills draft class would instead be: Nolen DT Ole Miss Porter, DB Iowa State Winslow, S Penn State Anybody? We ended up with a lesser DT but a better corner and safety than in that scenario IMO. 1 Quote
Sierra Foothills Posted Wednesday at 11:19 PM Posted Wednesday at 11:19 PM This was a fun and interesting exercise. Thanks to all of the participants. 1 Quote
SoCal Deek Posted Wednesday at 11:45 PM Posted Wednesday at 11:45 PM 50 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: We ended up with a lesser DT but a better corner and safety than in that scenario IMO. It shows you just how fickle the entire draft process is. Lots and lots of moving parts. Quote
Richard Noggin Posted Thursday at 02:37 AM Posted Thursday at 02:37 AM 4 hours ago, SoCal Deek said: I’ve said repeatedly that I’m no draft expert but just like every other Mock that I look at, I immediately go to the guys the Bills did NOT take who were available just a few picks later. In this case the Bills draft class would instead be: Nolen DT Ole Miss Porter, DB Iowa State Winslow, S Penn State Anybody? 3 hours ago, GunnerBill said: We ended up with a lesser DT but a better corner and safety than in that scenario IMO. Just to clarify @GunnerBill, "that scenario" (with the lesser DT but better DBs) is the actual board's mock draft result, not the one being quoted here? Quote
FireChans Posted Thursday at 02:50 AM Posted Thursday at 02:50 AM 12 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: Thanks @Virgil!! This was great again. I actually enjoyed walking away hating the Bills draft 🤣🤣. Its incredible. Last years mock 3.0 had us trading up to 19 for BTJ and I will never let myself get hurt again. 1 3 Quote
Virgil Posted Thursday at 04:01 AM Author Posted Thursday at 04:01 AM 1 hour ago, FireChans said: Its incredible. Last years mock 3.0 had us trading up to 19 for BTJ and I will never let myself get hurt again. I still think about that pick. Quote
GunnerBill Posted Thursday at 06:37 AM Posted Thursday at 06:37 AM 3 hours ago, Richard Noggin said: Just to clarify @GunnerBill, "that scenario" (with the lesser DT but better DBs) is the actual board's mock draft result, not the one being quoted here? Yea I think the board's actual mock was a better corner and safety but lesser DT than the alternative being suggested. That said the biggest talent gap there is Nolan to Farmer. So fair to say is it worth that significant downgrade for smaller upgrades with the two DBs? 1 Quote
Bill from NYC Posted Thursday at 11:07 AM Posted Thursday at 11:07 AM 20 hours ago, Kirby Jackson said: Thanks @Virgil!! This was great again. I actually enjoyed walking away hating the Bills draft 🤣🤣. Yep. Who would recognize a Bills draft without a little disgust? Well, I take that back. We did have a few good drafts.....in the last 40 years. Quote
SoCal Deek Posted Thursday at 12:00 PM Posted Thursday at 12:00 PM 5 hours ago, GunnerBill said: Yea I think the board's actual mock was a better corner and safety but lesser DT than the alternative being suggested. That said the biggest talent gap there is Nolan to Farmer. So fair to say is it worth that significant downgrade for smaller upgrades with the two DBs? Exactly. Mine wasn’t so much a suggestion as an emotionless look at an alternative based on who was still on the Board in each successive Round. It was meant to show how difficult all of this really is. It shows that the Bills will have plenty of options this year. I just pray that we won’t be revisiting these top three selections in endless threads a year from now lamenting over all of the woulda shoulda coulda scenarios. Quote
Westside Posted Thursday at 12:21 PM Posted Thursday at 12:21 PM 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Exactly. Mine wasn’t so much a suggestion as an emotionless look at an alternative based on who was still on the Board in each successive Round. It was meant to show how difficult all of this really is. It shows that the Bills will have plenty of options this year. I just pray that we won’t be revisiting these top three selections in endless threads a year from now lamenting over all of the woulda shoulda coulda scenarios. You know we will. We can’t help ourselves. 😆 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.