BillsFanNC Posted Monday at 09:26 PM Posted Monday at 09:26 PM Go ahead Quack. Condemn this just like everyone here has condemned those who were violent on J6. You too Roundy. And yes it is whatboutism. What about leftists condeming ALL political violence?
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Monday at 09:29 PM Author Posted Monday at 09:29 PM 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Go ahead Quack. Condemn this just like everyone here has condemned those who were violent on J6. You too Roundy. And yes it is whatboutism. What about leftists condeming ALL political violence? barbaric and uncivilized. no place for it.
nedboy7 Posted Monday at 11:46 PM Posted Monday at 11:46 PM 3 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Good to know he is still living in your head and trolling you idiots. 1
T master Posted Tuesday at 12:08 AM Posted Tuesday at 12:08 AM First off let me say I don't believe it will ever happen although I have heard in the past that a person that has been president for 2 terms could run for a third as a independent but I don't know that to be true . But if in some way all that he is doing does wind up changing the gov't and the country for the better I would entertain it but there is so much distain for him as it is & there would be so much more opposition to it if he said he was going to it will never happen !! JMHO . 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Tuesday at 01:30 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 01:30 PM Glad to see bipartisan agreement here. 14 to 2! I'm very surprised. 2 people on the board want an American king, however. 1
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 01:50 PM Posted Tuesday at 01:50 PM 13 hours ago, T master said: First off let me say I don't believe it will ever happen although I have heard in the past that a person that has been president for 2 terms could run for a third as a independent but I don't know that to be true . But if in some way all that he is doing does wind up changing the gov't and the country for the better I would entertain it but there is so much distain for him as it is & there would be so much more opposition to it if he said he was going to it will never happen !! JMHO . If you support this, you are against the Constitution. It’s simple as that. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Tuesday at 02:08 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 02:08 PM 15 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If you support this, you are against the Constitution. It’s simple as that. Ironic but unsurprising that the leader of the party that constantly cites the constitution is open to attacking it at the foundation. This won't be the only instance if his supporters continue. 1
T master Posted Tuesday at 02:11 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:11 PM (edited) 35 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If you support this, you are against the Constitution. It’s simple as that. Your a jack wagon and comprehension isn't your strong suit it's very apparent if you read and understand what I said I would "Entertain it" not go along with it dipsh*t and if you read the last line I said "IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN" what part of that did you not understand WTF ???? Edit; And after further revue of this the Twenty second amendment makes it so in no way can it happen but I guess if you entertain a idea or thought then that is total reason for bashing any one that might just think about something isn't it ?? Edited Tuesday at 02:26 PM by T master 1 1
nedboy7 Posted Tuesday at 04:05 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:05 PM 1 hour ago, T master said: Your a jack wagon and comprehension isn't your strong suit it's very apparent if you read and understand what I said I would "Entertain it" not go along with it dipsh*t and if you read the last line I said "IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN" what part of that did you not understand WTF ???? Edit; And after further revue of this the Twenty second amendment makes it so in no way can it happen but I guess if you entertain a idea or thought then that is total reason for bashing any one that might just think about something isn't it ?? You clearly showed your intellectual dishonesty. Maybe you shouldn’t talk about comprehension.
Albwan Posted Tuesday at 04:17 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:17 PM 16 hours ago, T master said: First off let me say I don't believe it will ever happen although I have heard in the past that a person that has been president for 2 terms could run for a third as a independent but I don't know that to be true . But if in some way all that he is doing does wind up changing the gov't and the country for the better I would entertain it but there is so much distain for him as it is & there would be so much more opposition to it if he said he was going to it will never happen !! JMHO . Just think how many more deranged head popping tho
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 04:19 PM Posted Tuesday at 04:19 PM 2 minutes ago, Albwan said: Just think how many more deranged head popping tho Shredding the Constitution to own the libs is such a pathetic way to go through life 2
B-Man Posted Tuesday at 05:39 PM Posted Tuesday at 05:39 PM 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Shredding the Constitution .
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Tuesday at 05:39 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 05:39 PM 1 hour ago, Roundybout said: Shredding the Constitution to own the libs is such a pathetic way to go through life Honestly, that's their top priority. It's like an NFL team that knows it sucks but gets its jollies from playing the spoiler once in a while.
T master Posted Tuesday at 06:31 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:31 PM (edited) 2 hours ago, nedboy7 said: You clearly showed your intellectual dishonesty. Maybe you shouldn’t talk about comprehension. Hey I'll be the first to tell you I'm not the sharpest nail in the box when it comes to book learned things but when it comes to practical application I'll go up against most any of ya'll any time . Then there is the fact that the focus in the other guys reply was on what he wanted to make it sound like I was trying to say and you also apparently miss there is a total difference in entertaining the thought of something and totally agreeing 100% with something so then there's that !! Edit: Then you apparently completely read right over the top of the very first line of my reply, so like the other fella you just focus on what you want to and forget the entire context of the statement, typical !! Edited Tuesday at 06:36 PM by T master
nedboy7 Posted Tuesday at 07:59 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:59 PM 1 hour ago, T master said: Hey I'll be the first to tell you I'm not the sharpest nail in the box when it comes to book learned things but when it comes to practical application I'll go up against most any of ya'll any time . Then there is the fact that the focus in the other guys reply was on what he wanted to make it sound like I was trying to say and you also apparently miss there is a total difference in entertaining the thought of something and totally agreeing 100% with something so then there's that !! Edit: Then you apparently completely read right over the top of the very first line of my reply, so like the other fella you just focus on what you want to and forget the entire context of the statement, typical !! Whats there to entertain? Explain to us and enlighten us.
T master Posted Tuesday at 09:23 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:23 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, nedboy7 said: Whats there to entertain? Explain to us and enlighten us. Boy you need some help if you don't have a freakin clue to what a statement like that means WTF ??? Edit : here you go seeing as you don't have the smarts to know the difference between supporting something and entertaining a thought . To Entertain a thought means to consider or think about To support means to agree with , approve of, or maintain a person, idea, cause, or thing . I know this probably won't help but I try to help those plainly slower than myself in any way I can, but now I have done my good deed for the day .. Have a good one ... Edited Tuesday at 09:32 PM by T master
Recommended Posts