Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, Einstein said:

 

My Buddy.  I love Built in Buffalo.. I have so much respect for the people involved that every time they go live.. I go there to PAY MY respects. 

 

Here is where I think they messed up.  IF you go back to "@SharpFootball on X and read the content.. most of it is stats.. or something said by someone else.. with a SMALL mix of clickbait in it..  SharpFootball has a ton of followers but they follow more because the tons and tons of content he puts out on stats, content from other sources but very little "clickbait" content like this.

 

In short.. With Respect.. I trust SharpFootball sources very little where I LOVE the statistical content and other content creator stuff he finds to post. 

 

Just wanted to share with you my thoughts on SharpFootball. 

with respect bro. 

Posted
4 hours ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Banning a play that everyone can do seems like whining because you aren’t good at it. Should they have banned qb sneaks because Brady was good at them? 

It's more like banning a play where one team gets the benefit of the doubt that the first down is made unless there is evidence to the contrary, and another team (the Bills) needs to provide evidence that the first down was made.

 

Now that the play has been exposed that the refs have no idea with spotting the ball, the play should be retired.  Also it's an unattractive play, already flirting with rule violations in getting pushed from behind, and seems like only a matter of time before someone just goes full out to injure the QB.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Room for thought: If the tush push was illegal would we have beat the Chiefs? 

 

We'd have still run sneaks. They aren't making sneaks illegal. Just the idea of the tush push.

Posted
5 hours ago, Prospector said:

Was there colorful language?

 

I heard it was quite the kerfuffle! 

 

 

 

I like to work that in when I can.  😊

Posted
38 minutes ago, Einstein's Dog said:

It's more like banning a play where one team gets the benefit of the doubt that the first down is made unless there is evidence to the contrary, and another team (the Bills) needs to provide evidence that the first down was made.

 

Now that the play has been exposed that the refs have no idea with spotting the ball, the play should be retired.  Also it's an unattractive play, already flirting with rule violations in getting pushed from behind, and seems like only a matter of time before someone just goes full out to injure the QB.

 

You mean like punching him in the head repeatedly?

 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Rubes said:

 

You mean like punching him in the head repeatedly?

 

They didn't care about that. 

 

What they did care about was when the one team had a strategy to defend the tush-push by guessing the count and sending a defender flying over the center -they got all bent out of shape about that.  After the defense did it a couple of times the refs threatened to award Philly a TD - what?  That annoyed me.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, MJS said:

You don't know that he does.

He admitted he doesn't like it in an interview a month back

7 hours ago, mannc said:

No, Josh Allen is the cheat code.  He should be better than any other QB at the sneak play.  Tush push evens the playing field because it’s more about technique…

Josh Allen is on the bills, right? So like I said, it's a cheat code for the bills since he's the running doing the play

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, DJB said:


 

McDermott wants it gone. No surprise 

 

I don't know the stats here, but does McDermott and those wanting it gone have stats to back up their stance?  I mean, I have never heard of anyone getting hurt on the play itself.  Not saying it hasn't happened, but if it has, I haven't heard about it.  Seems like if you are using player safety as the reason to ban it, you need the evidence to back up the claim. 

 

I am neutral on the issue.  Whatever comes of it is fine.  I suppose I will be a little disappointed that we can't do it anymore because, Chiefs game aside, we are very good at it and it is almost a guaranteed first down.  But whatever.  I know there's a lot of fans out there whining about the play because they just think it is cheap and boring.  My argument against that, though, is that the offense has 1 job.....move the ball down the field and get 1st downs within the 4 downs they are given.  Don't like the play?  Find a way to stop it.  I mean, the Chiefs did.....they lined up Offside and told the refs not to call it.  But it worked for them.  Anyway, I just kind of find this whole thing a bit funny.  Of all the things you need to fix in the game, the focus is on a glorified QB sneak.  Whatever.

Edited by sven233
Posted
8 hours ago, Just in Atlanta said:

Do we not run our own version of the tush push frequently with very good success with exception of the Kansas City playoff game? His aggressive take on this topic is bizarre and seems really illogical.


“it’s effective but not proper” isn’t terribly hard to reconcile 

  • Agree 2
Posted
10 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

Honestly, I might be one of the few people who couldn't care less about whether they ban the tush push. It's just a variant of the Quarterback sneak. Do I think if they change the rules and teams have to go old school QB sneak success rates will plummet? No. They might go down a bit, but not to an extent that radically alters the game. 

Philly and Buffalo will still be excellent at regular sneaks. Probably the two best teams because they have the biggest strongest QBs.

 

Much ado about nothing

Posted (edited)

They were probably arguing over that goofy hat with the flat brim McDermott was wearing.

 

Does he have an N'Sync tribute album coming out or something?

Edited by MikePJ76
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)

The tush push should be banned, UNLESS the defense can also push back. In other words, if say the LB could push and drive the dline forward to combat the extra help the oline gets. But at this point that is illegal. Which is stupid. 
 

Offenses already have plenty of advantage, so to also have this is ridiculous 

Edited by JPL7
  • Agree 1
Posted

Knowing McD like I think I do. He’s defense centric 

 

He prob had a rotational DLine player of his injury themselves vs a tush push situation. Carter? Phillips? Can’t remember.

 

i guarantee he thinks from a defensive perspective. (I can’t stop this) so he wants it out.

 

despite his obvious advantage OFFENSIVELY with his unicorn qb.

 

just more evidence if anyone needed any for how this coach thinks and operates 

Posted

I don’t mind the play itself, but it absolutely needs to be officiated better. Too often Philly moves early or lines up Offside. I’d consider allowing the play but also allowing defenses to challenge those two aspects of the play. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...