Dunkirk Donski Posted March 31 Posted March 31 4 hours ago, MikePJ76 said: Oh god this again. The only thing more boring than all the talk about this average player is the faux outrage about the tush push from the attention whores in the nfl media. I know, right? How hard is it to spell Ertz ? Quote
Doc Brown Posted March 31 Posted March 31 1 hour ago, Alphadawg7 said: He was a sack of beans before the injury having a terrible season We didn't know that last off-season and the 49ers apparently didn't either. Didn't count on him being rusty "holding in" during training camp. Quote
Alphadawg7 Posted March 31 Posted March 31 2 hours ago, Doc Brown said: We didn't know that last off-season and the 49ers apparently didn't either. Didn't count on him being rusty "holding in" during training camp. I was just clarifying what the other poster was referring to when he called him that. 1 Quote
FireChans Posted April 1 Posted April 1 9 hours ago, Don Otreply said: It sure is, I never understood why teams pay mediocre QBs so much money with no hope in hell that they will help the team progress, I understand that there is only ten or so good QBs in the league at any point in time but god do the over pay for those slouches, They made 2 conference championships and a Super Bowl with Brock. I wouldn’t pay Brock but they whiffed so bad on Lance, it’s not hard to see why they are strongly considering rolling with him. That plus Shanny’s ego of his system probably makes him believe in these guys more than the market would. 2 Quote
Big Turk Posted April 1 Posted April 1 Heck no...don't pay for players coming off serious injury until you see how they are performing 1 Quote
FireChans Posted April 1 Posted April 1 13 minutes ago, Big Turk said: Heck no...don't pay for players coming off serious injury until you see how they are performing If he performs really well, he won’t be available. Quote
Big Turk Posted April 1 Posted April 1 11 hours ago, FireChans said: If he performs really well, he won’t be available. That's fine...they are the ones taking that risk right now, not us. 2 Quote
FireChans Posted April 1 Posted April 1 2 hours ago, Big Turk said: That's fine...they are the ones taking that risk right now, not us. No risk it, no biscuit 1 Quote
Maine-iac Posted April 2 Posted April 2 Love the irony. Not that I think Aiyuk is a bad WR but I thought he was overpaid with that contract before he got injured. 1 Quote
Mister Defense Posted April 3 Posted April 3 He has been available perpetually since early last season, before the injury, which may not have happened if he had been in football shape after his 'holdout' The only way a trade happens is if the 49'ers pay a substantial amount of his contract and do not want almost anything for him. That is how it works when you try to unload a player like this, who may never be the same. The Bills should take a flyer on him if they can pay him close to the league minimum and if the price is no more than a 4th round pick. Then, worth the risk. Go Beane! Quote
Low Positive Posted April 3 Posted April 3 10 hours ago, Maine-iac said: Love the irony. Not that I think Aiyuk is a bad WR but I thought he was overpaid with that contract before he got injured. FWIW, I wouldn't have signed either one of them. But I have no control over what the team does so all I can do is support them and hope for the best. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.