Big Blitz Posted Sunday at 02:53 AM Posted Sunday at 02:53 AM Per the article - environmental investigations have been conducted and found nothing.
JFKjr Posted Sunday at 03:05 PM Posted Sunday at 03:05 PM Dang, sounds like they all got a 'hot batch' of the 'Safe & Effective Thing' that: Doesn't keep you from getting Covid Doesn't keep you from spreading Covid Maybe makes your symptoms less? Maybe keeps you out of the hospital Maybe gives you a brain tumor or turbocancer Time for another booster! Or maybe the FLU VERSION of mRNA that they're currently working on.
BillsFanNC Posted Sunday at 03:13 PM Posted Sunday at 03:13 PM This is awful. At the same time we must not jump to conclusions in an unscientific way like the left consistently does. It would be interesting to know not only what vaccine these individuals took (pfizer, moderna etc), how many boosters they took, and most importantly what specific lots of the vaccine they received. 1 2
JFKjr Posted Sunday at 03:17 PM Posted Sunday at 03:17 PM 2 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: This is awful. At the same time we must not jump to conclusions in an unscientific way like the left consistently does. It would be interesting to know not only what vaccine these individuals took (pfizer, moderna etc), how many boosters they took, and most importantly what specific lots of the vaccine they received. I would definitely be interested in knowing if they were all vaccinated in the same place with the same batch number. Even having three incidences of brain tumor close together all in one area like this would be a statistical anomaly. Especially among working age people. TEN is just insane! So they need to really work on tracking down the cause. But if it's a 'hot batch' it'll probably remain a 'mystery.' 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 03:45 PM Posted Sunday at 03:45 PM truly terrible. seems an odd organ for a carcinogen to target. This will be a fascinating investigation. I'd put radiation on the top of the differential diagnosis. I certainly wouldn't blame covid vax yet. There's more likely something specific to their work area. maybe they work on an oncology ward and give nuclear meds or test kits. maybe the ward is over rock with high ground radiation. maybe something else. I'll be watching for updates. Don't think they'll be limited to the lay press. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 03:50 PM Posted Sunday at 03:50 PM AI is pretty amazing. To understand the relationship between radiation and brain cancer, consider the following points: Ionizing radiation is known to increase the risk of various cancers, including brain cancer. High doses of radiation, such as those from radiation therapy for other cancers, can lead to brain tumors. Studies suggest a potential link between prolonged exposure to low-level radiation (e.g., from cell phones) and brain cancer, but evidence is inconclusive. Occupational exposure to radiation, such as in certain medical or nuclear professions, may elevate brain cancer risk. Genetic factors and individual susceptibility also play a role in how radiation affects cancer risk. The World Health Organization classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). More research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of radiation exposure on brain cancer development. 1
SectionC3 Posted Sunday at 03:57 PM Posted Sunday at 03:57 PM 10 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: truly terrible. seems an odd organ for a carcinogen to target. This will be a fascinating investigation. I'd put radiation on the top of the differential diagnosis. I certainly wouldn't blame covid vax yet. There's more likely something specific to their work area. maybe they work on an oncology ward and give nuclear meds or test kits. maybe the ward is over rock with high ground radiation. maybe something else. I'll be watching for updates. Don't think they'll be limited to the lay press. Solid points, as always. It's likely either environmental or something they're handling. Unless they all got the same COVID vax from the same batch, and the same batch has caused similar issues in similarly-situated persons, it's highly unlikely that the COVID vax had anything to do with this.
Big Blitz Posted Sunday at 04:05 PM Author Posted Sunday at 04:05 PM 13 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: AI is pretty amazing. To understand the relationship between radiation and brain cancer, consider the following points: Ionizing radiation is known to increase the risk of various cancers, including brain cancer. High doses of radiation, such as those from radiation therapy for other cancers, can lead to brain tumors. Studies suggest a potential link between prolonged exposure to low-level radiation (e.g., from cell phones) and brain cancer, but evidence is inconclusive. Occupational exposure to radiation, such as in certain medical or nuclear professions, may elevate brain cancer risk. Genetic factors and individual susceptibility also play a role in how radiation affects cancer risk. The World Health Organization classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). More research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of radiation exposure on brain cancer development. That’s all well and good. But did something in their radiation procedures change in the last 5 years? Should be easy to figure that out. And they absolutely would have by now.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted Sunday at 04:07 PM Posted Sunday at 04:07 PM 13 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Per the article - environmental investigations have been conducted and found nothing. So why doesn't everyone that got vaccinated have brain cancer?
SectionC3 Posted Sunday at 05:54 PM Posted Sunday at 05:54 PM 1 hour ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: So why doesn't everyone that got vaccinated have brain cancer? Winner winner chicken dinner. Because the attempt to link these cancer cluster to the COVID vaccine is a stupid hoax. 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: That’s all well and good. But did something in their radiation procedures change in the last 5 years? Should be easy to figure that out. And they absolutely would have by now. Yet you've concluded that the COVID vax is responsible. This is why you will be adequately replaced at work by a rescue dog. 3
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 05:59 PM Posted Sunday at 05:59 PM 1 hour ago, Big Blitz said: That’s all well and good. But did something in their radiation procedures change in the last 5 years? Should be easy to figure that out. And they absolutely would have by now. it won't be easy to prove causation from any source, I don't believe. Another thought is newer chemo drugs. almost all drugs (and radiation) that treat cancer can cause cancer.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 06:07 PM Posted Sunday at 06:07 PM the rest of the story: https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/newton-wellesley-hospital-nurses-brain-cancer-cases/ It's a maternal care ward. some tumors are malignancies, some not. the causes of nonmalignant tumors are generally different from malignant ones. going to be difficult to prove a cause.
The Frankish Reich Posted Sunday at 06:29 PM Posted Sunday at 06:29 PM Talk about jumping to conclusions. Ten nurses in a hospital, over a period of time (several years) developing brain tumors of different types. Null hypothesis: fooled by randomness. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 06:51 PM Posted Sunday at 06:51 PM 21 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Talk about jumping to conclusions. Ten nurses in a hospital, over a period of time (several years) developing brain tumors of different types. Null hypothesis: fooled by randomness. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning. and it looks like there were only 6 nurses. maga! 1
IrishLass Posted Sunday at 07:04 PM Posted Sunday at 07:04 PM 2 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: So why doesn't everyone that got vaccinated have brain cancer? Same reason not all kids get autism even though they get a boatload more vaccinations now vs 40 years ago. Some people are more susceptible to vaccine injury.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted Sunday at 07:20 PM Posted Sunday at 07:20 PM (edited) 15 minutes ago, IrishLass said: Same reason not all kids get autism even though they get a boatload more vaccinations now vs 40 years ago. Some people are more susceptible to vaccine injury. What you are illustrating is our success in battling vaccine preventable illnesses due to new vaccines. This is a good thing. There is no link between vaccines and autism. This has been disproven repeatedly. Parents need someone to blame. children’s health defense’ ceo is a lawyer. She links to rfk jr. wonder if she works with him suing pharmaceutical companies. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/our-team/ Edited Sunday at 07:21 PM by Joe Ferguson forever
IrishLass Posted Sunday at 07:26 PM Posted Sunday at 07:26 PM Once they do some safety studies on childhood vaccines with a control group in place maybe we'll have an answer to that. Right now we don't. We also don't have an answer to what 'causes' autism. I wonder what the conclusion was on the other four nurses who weren't part of the brain tumor cohort. No tumors? Unrelated tumors? (maybe not 'brain.') Timeframe before 2021? Hospital says it is NOT environmental: Based on these results, we can confidently reassure our dedicated team members at Mass General Brigham/Newton-Wellesley Hospital and all our patients that there is no environmental risk at our facility. As always, the health and wellbeing of our staff, clinicians, and patients is our absolute top priority," - Jonathan Sonis, Associate Chief Medical Officer and Vice President of Medical Affairs and Sandy Muse, Chief Nursing Officer and Senior Vice President of Patient Care Services. There are other Covid vax issues aside from potential brain tumors and turbo cancers:
Orlando Buffalo Posted Sunday at 07:27 PM Posted Sunday at 07:27 PM 3 hours ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said: So why doesn't everyone that got vaccinated have brain cancer? Thank you for admitting that the most basic level medicine or how vaccines work are too advanced for you. Even for you this level of trolling is just sad 58 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said: Talk about jumping to conclusions. Ten nurses in a hospital, over a period of time (several years) developing brain tumors of different types. Null hypothesis: fooled by randomness. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning. Rushing to a single conclusion without doing further research would be much too quick but 5+% people with cancer, even in a 5 year period, is almost certainly going to have some kind of proximate cause. The number of variables is much to large to claim one but this being random would be 1 in a billion
Recommended Posts