Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No one is buying the lies as they go down the coverup route.

No one believes the texts weren’t classified info.

The administration saying that DEI hires are unqualified fills the government with unqualified, unserious people who have very serious positions of responsibility. 
Does anyone trust these clowns vs the cyber capabilities of China, Russia, Iran and North Korea?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Hoax

Good point, for once.  There are a few fools out there buying the coverup of this text fiasco.  You apparently are one of them.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

oh silly me and I thought this topic was about 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by SectionC3. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by 4th&long. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Roundybout. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Trump_is_Mentally_fit. 

 

.....the TBD TDS MB edition

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Albwan said:

oh silly me and I thought this topic was about 

 

You've chosen to ignore content by SectionC3. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Homelander. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by 4th&long. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Roundybout. Options 

You've chosen to ignore content by Trump_is_Mentally_fit. 

 

.....the TBD TDS MB edition

This just shows how weak you are. Bills fans message board is filled with people on the right. Go over to that board to find other Mentally weak people like you. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

Good point, for once.  There are a few fools out there buying the coverup of this text fiasco.  You apparently are one of them.  

It was a screw-up and a breach of protocol and shouldn't have happened. I don't think texting is an appropriate form of communications for these types of military and intelligence operations. They might want to think about dumping that practice and limit the number of participants to those actually having some role in the execution and eliminate the "spectators" from the conversation.

 

But at this point its a big nothing burger. The texts should not have been shared but the information was time sensitive and the value of that information to anyone expired after the attack was completed. By the time the reporter announced he was included in the chat group the contents were worthless intelligence. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It was a screw-up and a breach of protocol and shouldn't have happened. I don't think texting is an appropriate form of communications for these types of military and intelligence operations. They might want to think about dumping that practice and limit the number of participants to those actually having some role in the execution and eliminate the "spectators" from the conversation.

 

But at this point its a big nothing burger. The texts should not have been shared but the information was time sensitive and the value of that information to anyone expired after the attack was completed. By the time the reporter announced he was included in the chat group the contents were worthless intelligence. 

The courts will decide if it's a big nothing burger now. You can try to sweep this under the rug all you want, not going to happen. 

 

And we all know the info was time sensitive. You guys should be kissing the reporters ass for not saying anything before the hit. I would have blown the lid off of this before the hit to expose this clown show! 

Posted
8 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

It was a screw-up and a breach of protocol and shouldn't have happened. I don't think texting is an appropriate form of communications for these types of military and intelligence operations. They might want to think about dumping that practice and limit the number of participants to those actually having some role in the execution and eliminate the "spectators" from the conversation.

 

But at this point its a big nothing burger. The texts should not have been shared but the information was time sensitive and the value of that information to anyone expired after the attack was completed. By the time the reporter announced he was included in the chat group the contents were worthless intelligence. 

Nothing burger.  Of course.  What a crock.  Who might have been tipped to the strike that we missed?  What intelligence methods might we have revealed?  We'll never know.  Loose lips sink ships.  Unless there DUI Pete's lips.  In which case it's cool, because he's MAGA and has some weird tattoos.  But keep talking about a few trannies here and there, Pizzagate, and Hunter Biden's laptop.  What a joke. 

11 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

This just shows how weak you are. Bills fans message board is filled with people on the right. Go over to that board to find other Mentally weak people like you. 

Don't forget losers.  Lots of losers there. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Nothing burger.  Of course.  What a crock.  Who might have been tipped to the strike that we missed?  What intelligence methods might we have revealed?  We'll never know.  Loose lips sink ships.  Unless there DUI Pete's lips.  In which case it's cool, because he's MAGA and has some weird tattoos.  But keep talking about a few trannies here and there, Pizzagate, and Hunter Biden's laptop.  What a joke. 

Don't forget losers.  Lots of losers there. 

Most of your ramblings are irrelevant to my assessment. And your questions about tipping off the target or intelligence methods could be asked of any operation or plan. Known risks without answers.  

Posted
12 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Most of your ramblings are irrelevant to my assessment. And your questions about tipping off the target or intelligence methods could be asked of any operation or plan. Known risks without answers.  

So why increase the risk by chatting about it via text?  There's no good answer for that.  But you believe there is, which is why your assessment is stupid. 

Posted
1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

But at this point it’s a big nothing burger.

Typical MAGA response. For anyone in the intelligence community, this is a huge deal. Russia, Iran and China now know that our military and intelligence officials communicate on Signal. They were probably using personal phones. They have their personal contacts lists. They can use those contacts to hack administration officials phones. They know the lack of competence of these people. The cyber division of their militaries is working overtime now with this treasure trove of information. 
 

Our government has secure communication platforms to use. Trump officials are likely not using them because those communication channels are subject to records preservation laws. Instead, they obviously prefer Signal since the messages disappear, thus erasing a communication trail for accountability. They will continue to use Signal because of this. Our enemies now know this. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Andy1 said:

Typical MAGA response. For anyone in the intelligence community, this is a huge deal. Russia, Iran and China now know that our military and intelligence officials communicate on Signal. They were probably using personal phones. They have their personal contacts lists. They can use those contacts to hack administration officials phones. They know the lack of competence of these people. The cyber division of their militaries is working overtime now with this treasure trove of information. 
 

Our government has secure communication platforms to use. Trump officials are likely not using them because those communication channels are subject to records preservation laws. Instead, they obviously prefer Signal since the messages disappear, thus erasing a communication trail for accountability. They will continue to use Signal because of this. Our enemies now know this. 

Russia, Iran and China now know that our military and intelligence officials communicate on Signal - like they didn't know that already? Come on. They hack us, we hack them. That's the game. This incident doesn't change the rules of the game or how its played. And yes, some adjustments in tactics are needed. 

 

And for the record, I am not MAGA. I'm a disenfranchised Democrat that the party forgot about when the nuts took over and the agenda shifted far-left. People such as me, formed the core of the party in the past. And the abandonment of voters that share my views and the dumping of the traditional core values of the party are the main reason Trump won and Harris didn't. She was too far out there and a real dummy to boot.

 

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Russia, Iran and China now know that our military and intelligence officials communicate on Signal - like they didn't know that already? Come on. They hack us, we hack them. That's the game. This incident doesn't change the rules of the game or how its played. And yes, some adjustments in tactics are needed. 

 

And for the record, I am not MAGA. I'm a disenfranchised Democrat that the party forgot about when the nuts took over and the agenda shifted far-left. People such as me, formed the core of the party in the past. And the abandonment of voters that share my views and the dumping of the traditional core values of the party are the main reason Trump won and Harris didn't. She was too far out there and a real dummy to boot.

 

 

 

While that may be the game, it was an amateur F up. 
 

Re the second part, I can understand that but Trump ain’t the answer. I too hope the Dems move to a more centrist position on many social issues. A third party would be great but doesn’t seem viable the way our government is run. 

×
×
  • Create New...