Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, 4th&long said:

I always say it proves who's right. Not once had he tried to defend Trump.

Baby. I already got my answer. You weren't a pilot. You get to emotional on here. If you were a fighter pilot you would be cool under pressure. 

 

So you are offering an opinion without taking the challenge.

You have made an accusation.

I am offering to prove it, as I can, easily.

 

You are doing the same thing Tib's did and following the same back down strategy.

 

Doubt my bona fides? 

Bet.

If not. Shut up.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, sherpa said:

 

So you are offering an opinion without taking the challenge.

You have made an accusation.

I am offering to prove it, as I can, easily.

 

You are doing the same thing Tib's did and following the same back down strategy.

 

Doubt my bona fides? 

Bet.

If not. Shut up.

Lol. You're too emotional to be a pilot. I wouldn't even give you a pistol. Lawsuit waiting to happen. You're too Maga. No need to bet I already told you, you exposed yourself. I got my answer. 

Posted

The texts detailed timing, targeting, and tactical objectives—and were confirmed when the operation was executed successfully.

 

But once again, the process-driven left mediais seizing on the story as a scandal of process, focused less on the operational success of an administration just a few months into implementing its policies, and more on perceived violations of the Federal Records Act, Espionage Act, and the use of encrypted messaging in government.

 

But as the MSNBC and CNN chyrons whirl aggressively later tonight, as “top-level national security” guests are ferried into D.C. and Manhattan studios to opine about “the serious implications!!!!!!111!1” of this all, the framing misses the far more consequential truth: the Trump administration’s national security team demonstrated ruthless clarity of mission, hard alignment with presidential policy, and fear-inducing tactical competence.

 

Far from a picture of chaos, the Signal exchange captures the Trump war cabinet executing a swift and decisive retaliatory strike on foreign adversaries. No leaks actually ended up compromising the mission.
 

The planning was otherwise tight. The strikes were exceptionally precise. The communication—despite the unintentional inclusion of a journalist—was professional and focused.

 

Compare this with the Obama administration’s decision to grant security clearances to Iranian regime-linked figures, or the Biden government’s chronic leaking of internal deliberations to preferred media outlets in the name of “narrative shaping.” In both cases, information was shared deliberately for political advantage—sometimes with actors who had no loyalty to U.S. interests. The Trump team’s sole error was accidental and internal; the others were strategic and often hostile to American strength.

 

https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis-post/the-atlantics-war-plan-leak-story-exposes-team-trump-as-thoughtful-competent-and-ruthless/

 

 

 

Still think this was deliberate 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

Lol. You're too emotional to be a pilot. I wouldn't even give you a pistol. Lawsuit waiting to happen. You're too Maga. No need to bet I already told you, you exposed yourself. I got my answer. 

 

You have exposed yourself.

Another useless moron, unable to stand by senseless accusations, and hiding like a cockroach when confronted.

The Tib's strategy.

 

Never ends among you folks.

 

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

You have exposed yourself.

Another useless moron, unable to stand by senseless accusations, and hiding like a cockroach when confronted.

The Tib's strategy.

 

Never ends among you folks.

 

 

 

Let me guess what your weak minded dumb ass bet would be? The loser leaves the message board forever. Dumbest ass thing ever on a message board is a bet. You are weak. It took me two posts to figure you out. Devonshire not a piolt.  To weak and emotional. You would get yourself and wingman killed. 

 

Go ahead google and copy and paste some piolt certificate. Just make sure it doesn't say sherpa on it. 

4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

Hoax, as expected. 

 

 

To late. White house already admitted it. 

Edited by 4th&long
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, 4th&long said:

Let me guess what your weak minded dumb ass bet would be? The loser leaves the message board forever. Dumbest ass thing ever on a message board is a bet. You are weak. It took me two posts to figure you out. Devonshire not a piolt.  To weak and emotional. You would get yourself and wingman killed. 

 

Go ahead google and copy and pat some piolt certificate. Just make sure it doesn't say sherpa on it. 

 

 

No.

Let's make it $10,000.

If I can't prove bona fides, I donate that amount to your favorite charity.

 

If I can, you donate to mine.

Want to engage?

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Doc said:

Goldberg should have kept quiet.  He could still have been in the loop.

It's always comforting to know that the Atlantic is part of the highest national security advisers in the great country. 

11 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

No.

Let's make it $10,000.

If I can't prove bona fides, I donate that amount to your favorite charity.

 

If I can, you donate to mine.

Want to engage?

Yawn. Your boring me.  You exposed yourself already, you are not a pilot. I'll add another reason you are not. If you were why would you care what someone you don't know on a message board has to say? Now you just seem to desperate to prove it. 

Edited by 4th&long
Posted
3 hours ago, Big Blitz said:


 

No one talks or texts like that.  
 

It’s ridiculously obvious.  
 

That “exchange” is a caricature of your people thinks we’d discuss these things casually let alone in a “security meeting.”  

 


If I were you, I’d probably ask what the administration wants to distract you from today but that’s just me.  
 

What’s more predictable is you folks actually believing this was NOT on purpose.  

If you are wrong? What should happen?

Posted
10 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

 

Yawn. Your boring me.  You exposed yourself already, you are not a pilot. I'll add another reason you are not. If you were why would you care what someone you don't know on a message board has to say? Now you just seem to desperate to prove it. 

 

Then take the bet.

It's $10,000 for your favorite charity.

 

If not, shut up.

Posted
8 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Then take the bet.

It's $10,000 for your favorite charity.

 

If not, shut up.

Sure let's see what you can copy and paste from Google. $100,000,000.

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said:

I'll pay $10k to 4th&schlongs charity of choice if she can prove that her IQ is above 80.

How's your mother? Was she good in bed this past weekend? 

12 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Then take the bet.

It's $10,000 for your favorite charity.

 

If not, shut up.

All this doesn't change the fact that you're weak non pilot ass still had not once in this thread commented on the clown show that you worship. Major national security breech and you have been trying is divert and distract. Weak. 

Posted
3 hours ago, sherpa said:

 

I am extremely pleased that the US conducted air strikes on the Houthis instead of "catching" missiles and drones,

That is what is important.

They can clean up their email lists, but the important thing is to eliminate the threat at its origin, and they are doing that,....now.

 

Well ... yes, we can all agree that it's a good thing that the op wasn't compromised ahead of time.

But that is not all that is important here.

This is just so jaw-droppingly stupid I had to check a couple other reports to confirm that it wasn't satire. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:

If you are wrong? What should happen?


 

There is no top secret info in that text exchange.  This is fact.  
 

Nothing in that article in the Atlantic has anything either.  It’s grossly sensationalized.  
 

This is why there is nothing from Democrat leadership about this.  Usually they’re the first ones to a camera.  
 

And the WH acknowledging it?  The people that do nothing but lie right?  Just not this time. 
 

Might be best to revert back to the 24 hour rule.  

  • Disagree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

Well ... yes, we can all agree that it's a good thing that the op wasn't compromised ahead of time.

But that is not all that is important here.

This is just so jaw-droppingly stupid I had to check a couple other reports to confirm that it wasn't satire. 

it's not satire.  he's not interested in humor.  but he honestly doesn't see a problem here where targets and tactics were exposed.  And the contempt for our allies is on full display.  perhaps that wasn't accidental.

×
×
  • Create New...